Someone who works for a media site partly or fully financed by Russia or any other country is not automatically a liar, an automaton, or a propagandist. Was Larry King a Russian agent?
Maddow claimed that the OAN person was. That was a smear. That was pure defamation.
Meaning that claiming someone is a Russian agent simply because they did reporting for Sputnik is defamation. Meaning it's not bullshit.
Instead of celebrating corruption in the judiciary, why not support justice. Because you know.....they coming for you one day.
You'll look as stupid then as you look now. Crack down on defamation and smears.
Is seeing a corrupt dirtbag cheating company fall into the trap set for them, while some imbecile at Tech Dirt cheers them on.
Think Afghanistan, buddy. They lied to you then. They are lying to you now. There is so much evidence of machine fraud. So much. You best start cooking that crow now. You're going to need a murder of crows to supply the necessary righting of your nearly terminal cognitive dissonance.....
How could Dominion be honest if Democrats send 700 lawyers to prevent discovery? 700. Think about it before your head explodes. Not long now.
I love hearing news about the corrupt company suing more people and organizations. It is so great to see this SLAPP suit proceed when we all know that Dominion cannot withstand discovery.
Message to Dominion: Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.
Message to TechDirt: Try to stop cheerleading for a corrupt and evil company?
Now, the anti-Free Speech writers at Tech Dirt are claiming their good buddy (/sarc) the Wall Street Journal is the authority on Free Speech issues, especially in regard to the now-openly-fascist social media corps.
Wow. Please do tell.....what else is the WSJ--your newest BFF--right about. Surely all of their policy stances you will now need to embrace like your lost twin brother separated in the Cave of the Clan Bear by the wolves who raised you.
Certainly the God-given right to free speech give to all humans did not reach your species yet. I hear that old copies of the WSJ burn well when there's nothing else to keep warm by.
Qualified immunity is NOT a protection against "bad" cops.
It IS a protection against frivolous law suits that any cop would be forced to spend 1000's of dollars to defend against.
Try to understand.
Say that anything you write about anything would be subject to immediate and numerous law suits, each one you would have to defend using attorneys paid on your own dime.
That would curtail your writing and reporting. The same happens to law enforcement.
Thinking or writing that it is any thing else than the destruction of an occupation? That's madness on your part.
You witnessed the results of your refusal to back Free Speech in social media backfire on you. 230 needs to be dismantled. Who cares how messy it will get? It could not be any worse than what we have now.
There used to be a bumper sticker, it was an answer to the common bumper stickers of America, love it or leave it. The alternative was: America, change it or lose it.
They had the opportunity to preserve freedom and fair play while under 230 protection. They didn't, cheered on by writers such as yourself.
Yes, Disentangling Disinformation is not as easy as it looks!!! Since there is no sucha thing as disinformation, then disentangling it is hard! In fact, it is impossible.
Any other made up terms you are having trouble disentangling? How about hate speech another imaginary term (see Supreme Court, then see First Amendment).
Why would you want to delete an opposite point of view? Especially in lite of all of the facts coming out revealing the dangerous effects for some of the vaccinations?
Always in previous times if even 20 people died after being vaccinated that was sufficient to halt vaccinations. So now, it's in the thousands and you write that we need to censor that news?
Never ceases to amaze me how, it it's conservative expression, Tech Dirt is all-in for censorship. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so short-sighted and mean-spirited.
Now Tech Dirt takes it to another level with Boomer Bashing.
But take heart. There's still a lot of room for putting down every other group who has a different point of view than the standard Williamsburg aging Gen-X'er.
I'm sure when the censors start censoring you it will be a surprise, but I've been surprised for a few years now that Tech Dijrt can't stick to copyright and patent nonsense, broadband monopolies, and a few other topics that they know something about. It's a surprise, the mission creep.
House Republican's Entire 'Big Tech' Platform Is 'We Must Force Big Tech To Display Our Conspiracy Theories And Lies'
Correction: House Republican's Entire Big Tech [No need to put the truth in quotes] Is 'We Must Force Big Tech to Honor The First Amendment'
There. Fixed it for ya.
Remember: a 'conspiracy theory' is just a theory that a country with Free Speech honors by allowing. Countless conspiracy theories have been proven true. Remember: Who judges what is a lie? Is it the Court of Public Opinion via Free Expression? Or is it some writer at Tech Dirt?
Who would anyone with even half a brain choose? I'll take Freedom of Expression & Speech over some prejudiced writer at Tech Dirt every single minute of every single day.
And so would, anyone who believes in the First Amendment as it applies throughout the entire American society. No more nitpicking.
So, you think it's dumb to fight for Free Speech? Could you get dumber? Why on Earth would you support totalitarian practices? Because Trump?
That's your reason? You are right about one thing: you could always get more dumber.
What else will you snark about? When all of your friends and associates are de-platormed because some social network decided that you and your buddies are also issuing "disinformation"?
When you lose your platform will you keep snarking to the neighboring table at the Starbucks (because you will have nowhere else any longer to snark)?
Will you ever stop writing stupid articles that celebrate fascism? Can you get even dumber?
If the guy had not resisted, the guy would not have been restrained. Who's fault is that? The guy's.
Do not resist arrest and detainment. Live to see another day.
Without qualified immunity there is no law and order.
If we are going to cancel qualified immunity, cancel it for all judges, prosecutors, politicians and do it immediately. As it is now these cretins enjoy super immunity from law suits, yet quite a few of them are screaming like hysterics for the removal of qualified immunity from the cops.
Why would anyone go into law enforcement, if they can be sued at any time by anybody?
The answer is: nobody would.
There you go: be careful of what you wish for. You just might get it.
Meanwhile, do not resist being arrested or detained.
On the post: Ninth Circuit Affirms MSNBC's Anti-SLAPP Motion Against OAN Network's Bullshit Defamation Lawsuit
Defame
Someone who works for a media site partly or fully financed by Russia or any other country is not automatically a liar, an automaton, or a propagandist. Was Larry King a Russian agent?
Maddow claimed that the OAN person was. That was a smear. That was pure defamation.
Meaning that claiming someone is a Russian agent simply because they did reporting for Sputnik is defamation. Meaning it's not bullshit.
Instead of celebrating corruption in the judiciary, why not support justice. Because you know.....they coming for you one day.
You'll look as stupid then as you look now. Crack down on defamation and smears.
On the post: There's a Growing Backlash Against Tech's Infamous Secrecy. Why Now?
Growth
We can only hope there is a growing backlash to Tech Dirt stupidity on this subject and several others.
When will you sincerely get woke? On the 12th of Never?
On the post: Judge Says Voting Machine Company Can Continue To Sue Trump's Buddies Over Bogus Election Fraud Claims
Happiness
Is seeing a corrupt dirtbag cheating company fall into the trap set for them, while some imbecile at Tech Dirt cheers them on.
Think Afghanistan, buddy. They lied to you then. They are lying to you now. There is so much evidence of machine fraud. So much. You best start cooking that crow now. You're going to need a murder of crows to supply the necessary righting of your nearly terminal cognitive dissonance.....
How could Dominion be honest if Democrats send 700 lawyers to prevent discovery? 700. Think about it before your head explodes. Not long now.
Wakey wakey.
On the post: Netflix's Ramped Up War On VPNs Comes With Collateral Damage
Finally!
An article on Tech Dirt topic!! I appreciate it!
On the post: Dominion Sues Newsmax, OAN, And The Head Of Overstock.Com For Election-Related Defamation
Keep it coming
I love hearing news about the corrupt company suing more people and organizations. It is so great to see this SLAPP suit proceed when we all know that Dominion cannot withstand discovery.
Message to Dominion: Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.
Message to TechDirt: Try to stop cheerleading for a corrupt and evil company?
Just try, ok?
Try.
On the post: Facebook Is NOT The Internet; Stop Regulating As If It Was
The Fix
Facebook Is NOT The Internet; Stop Regulating As If It Was
Changed to:
Facebook IS The Internet For BILLIONS Of People; Start Regulating As If It Was
On the post: Dish, Cornerstone Of The Trump DOJ's 'Fix' For The T-Mobile Merger, Continues To Bleed Wireless, TV Subscribers
FYI
At no point in Trump's Presidency was the DOJ "his."
On the post: Yes, Actually, The 1st Amendment Does Mean That Twitter Can Kick You Off Its Platform, Wall Street Journal
WSJ
Trch Dirt has sunk to new lows.
Now, the anti-Free Speech writers at Tech Dirt are claiming their good buddy (/sarc) the Wall Street Journal is the authority on Free Speech issues, especially in regard to the now-openly-fascist social media corps.
Wow. Please do tell.....what else is the WSJ--your newest BFF--right about. Surely all of their policy stances you will now need to embrace like your lost twin brother separated in the Cave of the Clan Bear by the wolves who raised you.
Certainly the God-given right to free speech give to all humans did not reach your species yet. I hear that old copies of the WSJ burn well when there's nothing else to keep warm by.
Good luck!
On the post: Social Network GETTR, Which Promised To Support 'Free Speech' Now Full Of Islamic State Jihadi Propaganda
Great News
So a site the pledges Free Speech is now filled with those who are exercising free speech?
Wow that is such a news scoop you found! People permitted to speak their mind, do speak their mind!!! Amazing!
So we are now back to an era of Free Speech again? What are you writing about? You are pro-totalitarianism?
On the post: New York Congresswoman Thinks It's Too Hard To Be A Good Cop, Offers Up Bill That Would Codify Qualified Immunity
Immunity
Qualified immunity is NOT a protection against "bad" cops.
It IS a protection against frivolous law suits that any cop would be forced to spend 1000's of dollars to defend against.
Try to understand.
Say that anything you write about anything would be subject to immediate and numerous law suits, each one you would have to defend using attorneys paid on your own dime.
That would curtail your writing and reporting. The same happens to law enforcement.
Thinking or writing that it is any thing else than the destruction of an occupation? That's madness on your part.
On the post: Last Month In An LA Court I Witnessed The Future Of A World Without Section 230; It Was A Mess
The Whrildwind
You witnessed the results of your refusal to back Free Speech in social media backfire on you. 230 needs to be dismantled. Who cares how messy it will get? It could not be any worse than what we have now.
There used to be a bumper sticker, it was an answer to the common bumper stickers of America, love it or leave it. The alternative was: America, change it or lose it.
They had the opportunity to preserve freedom and fair play while under 230 protection. They didn't, cheered on by writers such as yourself.
Bye bye to 230, sooner or later. Bring the mess.
On the post: Top German Court Says Facebook Must Inform Users About Deleting Their Posts Or Suspending Their Account, Explain Why, And Allow Them To Respond
At Least
Finally! Some court somewhere has done something with the school marm fascists at Facebook!
Will the birth nation of Free Speech follow?
On the post: Disentangling Disinformation: Not As Easy As It Looks
Disentangled
Yes, Disentangling Disinformation is not as easy as it looks!!! Since there is no sucha thing as disinformation, then disentangling it is hard! In fact, it is impossible.
Any other made up terms you are having trouble disentangling? How about hate speech another imaginary term (see Supreme Court, then see First Amendment).
Hope this helps!
On the post: Naturopath Sues Twitter After It Bans Her Account For Spreading Medical Misinformation
Title Translated
Headline should read:
Citizen with Different Beliefs than Medical Establishment Sues Fascistic Twitter After It Bans Her Account For Spreading Free Speech
There. Fixed it for ya.
On the post: Anti-Vaxxers Countermeasures Show Why It's Not So Simple To Just 'Delete' Anti-Vax Misinfo On Social Media
Curious
Why would you want to delete an opposite point of view? Especially in lite of all of the facts coming out revealing the dangerous effects for some of the vaccinations?
Always in previous times if even 20 people died after being vaccinated that was sufficient to halt vaccinations. So now, it's in the thousands and you write that we need to censor that news?
For why?
Could you start making sense? And making it soon?
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Help Me
So let me see if I can get this straight:
Enforcing the First Amendment on totalitarian tech monopolies is actually spitting on the First Amendment?
Clown World, Tech Dirt.
Clown World.
On the post: Exactly Right: 'You're Not Entitled To A Platform, Boomer.'
Astonishment
Never ceases to amaze me how, it it's conservative expression, Tech Dirt is all-in for censorship. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so short-sighted and mean-spirited.
Now Tech Dirt takes it to another level with Boomer Bashing.
But take heart. There's still a lot of room for putting down every other group who has a different point of view than the standard Williamsburg aging Gen-X'er.
I'm sure when the censors start censoring you it will be a surprise, but I've been surprised for a few years now that Tech Dijrt can't stick to copyright and patent nonsense, broadband monopolies, and a few other topics that they know something about. It's a surprise, the mission creep.
Oh well. Decay and fall.
On the post: House Republican's Entire 'Big Tech' Platform Is 'We Must Force Big Tech To Display Our Conspiracy Theories And Lies'
Correction
House Republican's Entire 'Big Tech' Platform Is 'We Must Force Big Tech To Display Our Conspiracy Theories And Lies'
Correction: House Republican's Entire Big Tech [No need to put the truth in quotes] Is 'We Must Force Big Tech to Honor The First Amendment'
There. Fixed it for ya.
Remember: a 'conspiracy theory' is just a theory that a country with Free Speech honors by allowing. Countless conspiracy theories have been proven true. Remember: Who judges what is a lie? Is it the Court of Public Opinion via Free Expression? Or is it some writer at Tech Dirt?
Who would anyone with even half a brain choose? I'll take Freedom of Expression & Speech over some prejudiced writer at Tech Dirt every single minute of every single day.
And so would, anyone who believes in the First Amendment as it applies throughout the entire American society. No more nitpicking.
On the post: It Can Always Get Dumber: Trump Sues Facebook, Twitter & YouTube, Claiming His Own Government Violated The Constitution
Snarter
So, you think it's dumb to fight for Free Speech? Could you get dumber? Why on Earth would you support totalitarian practices? Because Trump?
That's your reason? You are right about one thing: you could always get more dumber.
What else will you snark about? When all of your friends and associates are de-platormed because some social network decided that you and your buddies are also issuing "disinformation"?
When you lose your platform will you keep snarking to the neighboring table at the Starbucks (because you will have nowhere else any longer to snark)?
Will you ever stop writing stupid articles that celebrate fascism? Can you get even dumber?
On the post: Supreme Court Rejects Another Questionable Qualified Immunity Decision By An Appeals Court
One Thing
If the guy had not resisted, the guy would not have been restrained. Who's fault is that? The guy's.
Do not resist arrest and detainment. Live to see another day.
Without qualified immunity there is no law and order.
If we are going to cancel qualified immunity, cancel it for all judges, prosecutors, politicians and do it immediately. As it is now these cretins enjoy super immunity from law suits, yet quite a few of them are screaming like hysterics for the removal of qualified immunity from the cops.
Why would anyone go into law enforcement, if they can be sued at any time by anybody?
The answer is: nobody would.
There you go: be careful of what you wish for. You just might get it.
Meanwhile, do not resist being arrested or detained.
Next >>