Re: Why should political parties be above the law?
ok they have to obey the laws but what are the laws in this case the swedish or the US or what? for example lets say the speed limit in usa is 80 km /hr and in swedish is 100 km/hr so if they catch car at 90 km/hr then should they prosecute him?
according to the swedish law they are in the right (although maybe not so much morally but thats is another beast)
but they are afraid that if they got to trial they are going to be in a unfair disadvantage since goverments holliwood and their opponents will aply pressure
also before you acuse me of being a pirate or anticopyright i must say that i think we need copyright but also we need limits to copyright also we need something to limit the powers of copyright holders
exactly my point even the top paying goverment workers would have troubles paying these fines never mind the people under them so we have the 1 % percent(and that is being generous) of poblation that their lives woulnd't be ruined by copyright so my point stands the copyright laws needs to define their fines so people learn, not to ruin their lives
ok this disapoint me researching i saw that the yearly salary of an goverment is $193,400 yearly (this is the oficial salary) taking costs a hight payed individual could end their fines in 4 years that sounds a bit irrational but still tolerable the problem is that most people woek for much less
in example a guy i know made 8 usd per hour that means 80 usd per day or 400 usd per week at most he earns 19200 usd per year so the fines simply are insane if they were for eliminating piracy they would be minimun cost of the song i mean if you find it in itunes for .99 usd and in google pay for 5 usd they would use the .99 usd + 5 usd of fine that would be reasonable and would made people think would i save more paying for content or downloading and risking paying more? also a more resonable thing is they pay both lawyers when they lose a case (this is one of the things that made innocent people fold) so in this case the fine should be 145 usd and that would be reasonable but right now the punishment is not for people to learn it is for the enrichment of copyright holders
well a reasonable fine would be well... fine
2 usd per torrent is reasonable i think the problem is that i think the fines would be from $5000 usd up to insane amounts also the fact that false acusations wouldnt have penalties well you can undertstand why people dont think is a good idea
i enjoy sharing videos i like with other people the weakest one on the list still this could be potentially good in getting awareness of an obscure show/movie
i want to watch movies/tv on more of one device a medium one this is the real reason many people is against drm so we have a good reason to pirate althought i rather have the original and use the copy
i can't find what i want with legal channels this reason is one of the two that more resonates with me i like videogames but here i don't have any store where they sell pc videogames in fact the ones that used to sell them have retired their catalog so i can understand the appeal of this reason
legal version are too expensive this is the other one that resonates with me a console videogame cost 1/5 of the console that is pretty expensive and when the game is bad you have wasted your money (this i mean all hyped games like re6 ff13, and diablo 3) in fact it looks like the more expensive are the worst games
i have to wait too long this is not a big problem for me
i dont want to watch commercials this is one i wouldn't mind if the commercial lowers the cost of the media but in fact is the inverse instead of ads paying my content i am paying for ads in example the most hated ads i all story you are a pirate in the theathers
this is accurate i have heard from one of my friends he went to job hunt and landed a small job optimizing software apparently the hours were 8 hours a day and weekends off
well the problem began later when they began to add extra unpayed time 9 hours later 10 hours and then consuming saturdays and next were talking about getting sundays too when he began to made his calculations 12 hours everyday and 8 saturdays for 260 usd a month he decided to leave his job and to look for greener pastures so i see how those $25K can be tempting
still not enought carrot for me thought
yes apparently is pretty large but i rather have a wow cool than to see my software earning millions and not getting a cent of that in fact the wow cool can be worth more than $25k if you play well your cards
well since you want a specific answer i'll try to be clear
longer copyrights means than an author no longer needs to create new content only to bask in their glory so it hinder the innovation of author that could have created 2 3 or 4 great works only creates one
also means that new authors are scared to create could i create this or it is already copyrighted for example i cant create a superHlero comic and sell it as superhiroeing(notice misspelling) because the word is trademarked by dc and marvel so we have new authors whose innovation is hindered
also the offpring of the authors can live with the work of their parents so they aren't motivated to create new content so their innovation is hindered
so i would think that when the function of copyright is being inverted they must restructure it
On the post: Anti-Piracy Group Threatens Pirate Party With Criminal Charges For Hosting The Pirate Bay
Re: Why should political parties be above the law?
according to the swedish law they are in the right (although maybe not so much morally but thats is another beast)
but they are afraid that if they got to trial they are going to be in a unfair disadvantage since goverments holliwood and their opponents will aply pressure
also before you acuse me of being a pirate or anticopyright i must say that i think we need copyright but also we need limits to copyright also we need something to limit the powers of copyright holders
On the post: Obama Administration, Once Again, Says $222,000 For Sharing 24 Songs Is Perfectly Reasonable
Re: Re: Woah on the pay figure...
On the post: Obama Administration, Once Again, Says $222,000 For Sharing 24 Songs Is Perfectly Reasonable
in example a guy i know made 8 usd per hour that means 80 usd per day or 400 usd per week at most he earns 19200 usd per year so the fines simply are insane if they were for eliminating piracy they would be minimun cost of the song i mean if you find it in itunes for .99 usd and in google pay for 5 usd they would use the .99 usd + 5 usd of fine that would be reasonable and would made people think would i save more paying for content or downloading and risking paying more? also a more resonable thing is they pay both lawyers when they lose a case (this is one of the things that made innocent people fold) so in this case the fine should be 145 usd and that would be reasonable but right now the punishment is not for people to learn it is for the enrichment of copyright holders
On the post: Jealous Of Copyright Trolls, Entertainment Industry Looks To Move Three Strikes From 'Disconnect' To 'Fines'
Re: Uh.... isn't this what you wanted?
2 usd per torrent is reasonable i think the problem is that i think the fines would be from $5000 usd up to insane amounts also the fact that false acusations wouldnt have penalties well you can undertstand why people dont think is a good idea
On the post: The Many Motivations Of Movie Piracy (Notably Absent: 'I Want Everything For Free')
i enjoy sharing videos i like with other people the weakest one on the list still this could be potentially good in getting awareness of an obscure show/movie
i want to watch movies/tv on more of one device a medium one this is the real reason many people is against drm so we have a good reason to pirate althought i rather have the original and use the copy
i can't find what i want with legal channels this reason is one of the two that more resonates with me i like videogames but here i don't have any store where they sell pc videogames in fact the ones that used to sell them have retired their catalog so i can understand the appeal of this reason
legal version are too expensive this is the other one that resonates with me a console videogame cost 1/5 of the console that is pretty expensive and when the game is bad you have wasted your money (this i mean all hyped games like re6 ff13, and diablo 3) in fact it looks like the more expensive are the worst games
i have to wait too long this is not a big problem for me
i dont want to watch commercials this is one i wouldn't mind if the commercial lowers the cost of the media but in fact is the inverse instead of ads paying my content i am paying for ads in example the most hated ads i all story you are a pirate in the theathers
On the post: Campbell's Hack The Kitchen Shows Anyone Can Have An Innovative Idea, And Anyone Can Screw It Up
Re: Re: Re: Cost$
well the problem began later when they began to add extra unpayed time 9 hours later 10 hours and then consuming saturdays and next were talking about getting sundays too when he began to made his calculations 12 hours everyday and 8 saturdays for 260 usd a month he decided to leave his job and to look for greener pastures so i see how those $25K can be tempting
still not enought carrot for me thought
On the post: Campbell's Hack The Kitchen Shows Anyone Can Have An Innovative Idea, And Anyone Can Screw It Up
Re: Re: Cost$
On the post: Corruption Laundering: The Art Of Manipulating Regulations To Block Innovation
Re: How
longer copyrights means than an author no longer needs to create new content only to bask in their glory so it hinder the innovation of author that could have created 2 3 or 4 great works only creates one
also means that new authors are scared to create could i create this or it is already copyrighted for example i cant create a superHlero comic and sell it as superhiroeing(notice misspelling) because the word is trademarked by dc and marvel so we have new authors whose innovation is hindered
also the offpring of the authors can live with the work of their parents so they aren't motivated to create new content so their innovation is hindered
so i would think that when the function of copyright is being inverted they must restructure it
Next >>