Metzitzah b’peh is not used in most Jewish circumcision ceremonies, but many in the haredi Orthodox community still adhere to the rite. Many haredi leaders have resisted calls to use alternative approaches.
I know you guys have a religious ritual called Metitzah B'peh where you cut off the tip of a baby's penis and suck blood out of it with your mouth and other jews let you do it.
Lulwhat? I never heard of such a thing. Are you talking about a Bris? That's a circumcision which removes the foreskin.
Goddammit, you're like Trump; not only are you a Nazi, but you're a lazy, pathetic nazi to [jack]boot!
When the court made a decision in this arguement, they changed their mind about a lot of things. One thing they changed their mind about is explaining why they changed their mind. A lot of people are very upset because now we don't know what is okay and what is not.
I would say what the court did in this decision is akin to what Kefka did in Final Fantasy VI with the statues: it shifted the balance so much that the world (or at least in the case of US law, the legal world) is plunged into chaos.
I'm going to regret arguing with a Nazi, but I'll bite.
When are you going to understand that blacks,Indians,Asians,Mexicans,jews,,and weird combinations of these people were NEVER intended by the people who wrote the Constitution to be citizens of America and women were NEVER INTENDED to be allowed to have any political power,let alone gay people or people who dress up in the opposite sex's clothing and impersonate them?
The Founding fathers didn't even consider Swedes white, but you're way wrong about us Jews. Contrary to the anti-Semitic canard that Benjamin Franklin warned against the Jews taking control, Franklin donated to the construction of Philadelphia's first synagogue:
1788 Subscription List
Members of the congregation, including Rev. Seixas , returned to New York , Charleston and other locations when British occupation ceased. Left with debt incurred by synagogue construction loans, a subscription list was addressed to "worthy fellow Citizens of every religious Denomination." Among the contributors were Benjamin Franklin; David Rittenhouse, astronomer; Hilary Baker, city councilman (later mayor); Thomas McKean, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, Chief Justice and later Governor of Pennsylvania; William Bradford, Attorney-General of Pennsylvania; and Thomas Fitzsimmons, a drafter of the U.S. Constitution, first president of the Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce and the city's leading Catholic layman.
I mean, it's not like TechDirt doesn't say anything bad about the US, so I find it extremely difficult to argue that TechDirt's authors are unprincipled jingoistic hypocrites.
Senator from Missouri blows the dog whistle as hard as he can to distract from the Jan 6th insurrection & the recent 'but we don't lock up white people this way' festival.
FTFY. You got the state wrong, That Anonymous Coward…
TikTok is not Facebook or YouTube. You can't compare it with that. The closest thing to TikTok, Vine, had closed down a long time ago after being bought by Twitter. Have you seen any site that, from functional standpoint, is just like Facebook or YouTube succeeding lately? Me neither.
Your comment might as well be
Facebook is not YouTube. You can't compare it with that. The closest thing to YouTube, RealAudio, had closed down because everyone was forced to install it and update it. Have you seen any site that, from a functional standpoint, is just Facebook succeeding lately? Me either.
And look just as myopic or have the point flown over their head.
"Why?" you ask? Because of course TikTok is not Facebook or YouTube! If it were, it wouldn't have succeeded. Facebook already has their niche carved, as does YouTube and Twitter; if TikTok were exactly like them, it wouldn't have been successful. The reason why you're not getting TikTok is because you're not young enough (neither am I, which is why I don't subscribe to it).
Carr, who has been trying to seed this idea in the press and policy circles for months, was back at it again last week, pointing to a new Oracle-funded study that suggests funding broadband expansion via a tax on advertising revenue:
[ED: bolding mine]
There's your answer. It was funded by Oracle, who part of making the narrative against "big tech" a thing. Like Karl Bode has said, the major players are doing bad things (especially Amazon, which is why I largely try to boycott them except for Twitch). However, the animosity against Big Tech could make the internet experience worse, which is why I am a proud insider of Techdirt whose opinions I value.
Just so you know, I completely agree with JoJo's statement that "PETA is to animals as Autism Speaks is to People on the spectrum." Being on the spectrum, I can attest to that. It's just that you could be a complete raving and annoying asshole and still make a legitimate legal case for having your rights violated.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re:
Sorry, Anti-vaxxer.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re: Re:
DIdn't surprise me that this Nazi was also an anti-vaxxer. https://sorryantivaxxer.com
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And it's something most Jews do not do, just a sect of haredi Orthodox Jews: https://www.jta.org/2014/02/02/united-states/n-y-newborn-contracts-herpes-from-controversial-circumc ision-rite
[ED: bolding mine]
Great research you did there, Murrow.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Lulwhat? I never heard of such a thing. Are you talking about a Bris? That's a circumcision which removes the foreskin.
Goddammit, you're like Trump; not only are you a Nazi, but you're a lazy, pathetic nazi to [jack]boot!
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re:
I would say what the court did in this decision is akin to what Kefka did in Final Fantasy VI with the statues: it shifted the balance so much that the world (or at least in the case of US law, the legal world) is plunged into chaos.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re: Re:
It's obvious you have.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: Re: Re:
LOL. You know nothing. Keep barking phlegm out of your pustules, Nazi.
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re:
I'm going to regret arguing with a Nazi, but I'll bite.
The Founding fathers didn't even consider Swedes white, but you're way wrong about us Jews. Contrary to the anti-Semitic canard that Benjamin Franklin warned against the Jews taking control, Franklin donated to the construction of Philadelphia's first synagogue:
[ED: bolding mine].
I think I'll leave with a missive of the Dead Kennedys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyc62g7YQM0
On the post: The Night The United States Supreme Court Cancelled Law
Re: What's next?
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
On the post: Welcome To The New Techdirt Greenhouse Panel: Content Moderation At The Infrastructure Level
Cory Doctorow?
Will Cory Doctorow once again be making an appearance?
On the post: Russian Government Abuses IP Law, Regular Law To Shut Down Alexey Navalny's 'Smart Voting' App
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The ironic twist is that you're writing it out of St. Petersburg, Florida. :-P
On the post: Now Josh Hawley Is Threatening Google Over 1st Amendment Protected Expression
Re: Re: Re: Re:State of confusion
This one is available in the US of A: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq7FKO5DlV0
On the post: Now Josh Hawley Is Threatening Google Over 1st Amendment Protected Expression
Re: Re: Re:
Touché!
On the post: Russian Government Abuses IP Law, Regular Law To Shut Down Alexey Navalny's 'Smart Voting' App
Re: Re: Re:
I mean, it's not like TechDirt doesn't say anything bad about the US, so I find it extremely difficult to argue that TechDirt's authors are unprincipled jingoistic hypocrites.
On the post: Now Josh Hawley Is Threatening Google Over 1st Amendment Protected Expression
Re:
FTFY. You got the state wrong, That Anonymous Coward…
On the post: Russian Government Abuses IP Law, Regular Law To Shut Down Alexey Navalny's 'Smart Voting' App
Re:
Sure thing, Glenn Greenwald.
On the post: As We're Told That No New Social Media App Can Make It, TikTok Surpasses Facebook Downloads & YouTube Watch Time
Re: You are strawmaning.
Your comment might as well be
And look just as myopic or have the point flown over their head.
"Why?" you ask? Because of course TikTok is not Facebook or YouTube! If it were, it wouldn't have succeeded. Facebook already has their niche carved, as does YouTube and Twitter; if TikTok were exactly like them, it wouldn't have been successful. The reason why you're not getting TikTok is because you're not young enough (neither am I, which is why I don't subscribe to it).
On the post: FCC's Carr Still Pushing A Dumb Telecom Tax On 'Big Tech'
The problem in question
[ED: bolding mine]
There's your answer. It was funded by Oracle, who part of making the narrative against "big tech" a thing. Like Karl Bode has said, the major players are doing bad things (especially Amazon, which is why I largely try to boycott them except for Twitch). However, the animosity against Big Tech could make the internet experience worse, which is why I am a proud insider of Techdirt whose opinions I value.
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: September 12th - 18th
Re:
Fortunately, Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani have their licenses suspended (do they? Or are they merely sanctioned?)
On the post: PETA Sues NIH And HHS Directors For Blocking Comments With 'PETA' And '#StopAnimalTesting'
Re: Re: Re:
Just so you know, I completely agree with JoJo's statement that "PETA is to animals as Autism Speaks is to People on the spectrum." Being on the spectrum, I can attest to that. It's just that you could be a complete raving and annoying asshole and still make a legitimate legal case for having your rights violated.
Next >>