sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 10 Oct 2012 @ 9:42am
There is an interesting observation from one of the commenters on my blog: he noticed that our community is rather excited about the prospect of a fair trial. Too much for a bunch of thieves and pirate apologists as trolls try to portray us!
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 10 Oct 2012 @ 9:40am
Re: Re: Re:
This "something" is called "wishful thinking."
As a matter of fact, according to my sources, the judge is willing to accept sworn affidavits from defendants as a proof of their innocence if pornographers' evidence turns out unconvincing.
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 2 Oct 2012 @ 11:36am
Re: Re: Re: Wow
We all love to discuss abstract matters. Morality! Amount of work put into"property"! Fairness! Stealing! Poor artists!
Yet in this particular case it's a 10K-budgeted cheap pornography, the copyright to which was assigned to a sham offshore firm, AF Holdings, with a sole purpose of extracting settlements from alleged file-sharers (and "negligent" neighbors)using fraud on courts, lies, lies, extortion, lies.
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 2 Oct 2012 @ 6:24am
Re: Re: Rugierro
Thanks, TAC. Your comment is almost a post, and I MUST post about this scumbag, so people googling for his name come to us and get rid of their irrational fear.
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 1 Oct 2012 @ 8:04am
Rugierro
FYI Rugierro is a new Prenda's local counsel (read: goon), a guy with a questionable past. He has licenses in multiple New England states and brings suits against individuals to the new turf (like Rhode Island). I did not investigate in depth, TAC knows more.
As for the claim, I don't think the crooks believe a bit in the likelihood of success, it's just a part of a "spaghetti-on-the-wall" approach, that's it.
If it is premature to sever based on possibility, why isn't is premature to file a frivolous lawsuit based on 70% possibility?
70% likelihood of the alleged connection is not a prima facie case.
Once again, talk to those 30% wrongly accused (which translates to > 60,000), preferably in person, and then come back.
Alternatively, you can try to disprove the 30% number, but for that you are expected to have the first person knowledge of the IP address collection technology, or at very least point to the forensic certifications of the alleged experts.
In the meantime feel free to continue asserting that you have no clue about the topic.
Ohai TAC. I'm from a short (on the European scale) 16-day vacation and full of energy. Day before yesterday I've been feeding tropical fish in lava pools, so I'm feeding trolls by inertia.
And John Steele is a role model we all should idolize. Right.
Try to preach to the thousands of innocents that are being harassed and extorted over cheap smut as we speak. Unless you speak to them, your are no more than a cab driver talking about foreign policies.
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 24 Aug 2012 @ 10:47am
Oh yeah, Howell's write up is now a sacred text for the trolls. I see references to it here and there in filings already.
Based on my experience I believe that this particular Memorandum has inspired John Steele to stick his penis into a bee hive: to sue AT&T and Comcast in one of the most frivolous shakedown lawsuits ever filed.
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 10 Aug 2012 @ 11:52am
A browser plugin
I have an idea of a simple browser plugin: all it does just skips a couple of Google result pages when there is "free" in the search string. Any takes? MAFIAAFIre?
On a side note, look at the footnote #3 of the judge's order: it has a link to my Scribd account: I'm so happy: not for myself — for the fact that the adversarial voices are heard: in most cases no opposition exists at the moment when judges allow discovery, and this is one of the most predatory features of the trolling lawsuits.
On the post: Judge Calls Copyright Troll's Bluff
Re: Re: With you on view, except for spelling:
On the post: Judge Calls Copyright Troll's Bluff
On the post: Judge Calls Copyright Troll's Bluff
Re: Re: Re:
As a matter of fact, according to my sources, the judge is willing to accept sworn affidavits from defendants as a proof of their innocence if pornographers' evidence turns out unconvincing.
Keep trolling.
On the post: Judge Calls Copyright Troll's Bluff
Re: Re: Send in the Troops
On the post: Copyright Trolls Still Arguing That Open WiFi Is 'Negligent'
Re: Re: Re: Wow
Yet in this particular case it's a 10K-budgeted cheap pornography, the copyright to which was assigned to a sham offshore firm, AF Holdings, with a sole purpose of extracting settlements from alleged file-sharers (and "negligent" neighbors)using fraud on courts, lies, lies, extortion, lies.
On the post: Copyright Trolls Still Arguing That Open WiFi Is 'Negligent'
Re: Re: Rugierro
I'll do a bit of a research and move forward.
He should have expected us :)
On the post: Copyright Trolls Still Arguing That Open WiFi Is 'Negligent'
Re: Case Law
On the post: Copyright Trolls Still Arguing That Open WiFi Is 'Negligent'
Rugierro
As for the claim, I don't think the crooks believe a bit in the likelihood of success, it's just a part of a "spaghetti-on-the-wall" approach, that's it.
On the post: Another Judge Blasts Copyright Trolls
Re: Re: Re:
70% likelihood of the alleged connection is not a prima facie case.
Once again, talk to those 30% wrongly accused (which translates to > 60,000), preferably in person, and then come back.
Alternatively, you can try to disprove the 30% number, but for that you are expected to have the first person knowledge of the IP address collection technology, or at very least point to the forensic certifications of the alleged experts.
In the meantime feel free to continue asserting that you have no clue about the topic.
On the post: Another Judge Blasts Copyright Trolls
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Another Judge Blasts Copyright Trolls
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Try to preach to the thousands of innocents that are being harassed and extorted over cheap smut as we speak. Unless you speak to them, your are no more than a cab driver talking about foreign policies.
On the post: Another Judge Blasts Copyright Trolls
Re: Re:
On the post: Another Judge Blasts Copyright Trolls
Re: Extortion
This quote can be found in dozens of judge orders and hundreds of motions nowadays.
On the post: RIAA Lobbyist-Turned-Judge: ISPs Deserve Copyright Trolls For Not Stopping Infringement
Apparently this judge has stock of Liberty Media Corporation, not infamous (thaks to its counsel) gay pornography purveyor Liberty Media Holdings.
Nonetheless to avoid any ambiguity, she recused herself immediately.
2. Here is what corrupt judges do.
On the post: RIAA Lobbyist-Turned-Judge: ISPs Deserve Copyright Trolls For Not Stopping Infringement
Based on my experience I believe that this particular Memorandum has inspired John Steele to stick his penis into a bee hive: to sue AT&T and Comcast in one of the most frivolous shakedown lawsuits ever filed.
On the post: Google Caves To Hollywood Pressure: Will Now Punish Sites That Get Lots Of 'Valid' DMCA Notices
A browser plugin
On the post: Jack Daniel's Shows The World: Here's How To Send A Polite Cease-And-Desist
On the post: Copyright Troll Claims Sanctions Against Him Are 'Bulls**t' And He's Going To Keep Sending Questionable Subpoenas
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Copyright Troll Claims Sanctions Against Him Are 'Bulls**t' And He's Going To Keep Sending Questionable Subpoenas
Re:
On the post: Copyright Troll Claims Sanctions Against Him Are 'Bulls**t' And He's Going To Keep Sending Questionable Subpoenas
Re: Re: Re:
Next >>