Oh I have no problem defaming them.. In fact Malibu media most definitely are a pack of incompetent egotistical inbred morons who are more corrupt than any politician.
Though a caveat is that where I reside there is no such thing as defaming an organisation (only real persons can be defamed) . so maybe I'm just lucky ;)
Well I definitely take umbrage with being classified as a psychopath in legal documents and as someone who could be doing criminal acts according to the same civil US court filing by Ms Schulz.
In fact maybe I should consider defamation action and dragging her through the international legal mud. The US immunity structures for attorneys do not hold up in civil filings that can be reasonably shown to be vexatious, malicious and knowingly false towards persons who are NOT parties in any way to the case before the courts.
Personally I think Ms Schulz needs to get off her egotistical high horse of blaming the world for her inadequacies and failures, and instead deal with the case in an ethical and civil way as she has to as an officer of the courts.
Though maybe something like what I just suggested would be a good start to make her have that sharp jolt to her psyche that's most definitely needed. And hey maybe the declaratory judgement I'm thinking of wouldn't have comity in the USA but it would at least mean she wont be flying anywhere outside of the USA for a long long long time.
You're assuming that people actually purchase products based on TV/Cable advertisements any more.
The reality is, and this scares the hell out of all the marketing companies etc is that advertisement in its current form is barely working anymore. people are becoming either too cynical or too inured by multiple ubiquitous advertising forums for the advertising to actually work anymore.
It's not just a matter of being 'literate' it's also a matter of being to interpret and understand the written word and being able to communicate that in a concise and CONSISTENT way that has contextual meaning.
Literacy might be on the rise (and spelling is not really of relevance in this though is a pet peeve of lots of people myself included) though the ability to communicate other than in sound bites and actually retain meaning with that communication and hold conversations IS becoming less and less due to the influx of technology that gives them an illusion that they are multi-tasking on a huge amount of conversations at once, when in fact they are not actually communicating and instead are barely conversing.
I see this constantly in University with students and graduates alike where they try to place everything into small pockets of points that do not flow together and make a whole. Its quite annoying trying to interpret what they are trying to state sometimes.
Thanks for that pdf... I was taught cursive at school (early 1970's) though as I grew older my style has changed to include a script method with a mix of cursive styles.
It's readable, fast for me to write and though my Capital letters all look like they use "Palmer" in that most of my lowercase are a mix of Getty-Dubay or dare I say it helvetica without even being taught that way.
I still use a paper diary, still write out minutes and also use a form of shorthand that I was taught by my mother who was a stenographer in late 70's too.
I see students trying to grasp with taking notes using a tablet, laptop or even phone but they still take less time to do this than the good old pen/pencil
Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright implications are staggering
Why yes I do, which is why I differentiated between common law and civil law jurisdictions..
Please read my comments in the order they appear that way context is retained and assumptions don't make you look like well.. you know the old saying about assuming.
You are clearly suffering from some sort of mental malady and therefore being a concerned human I should now call the appropriate authorities to 'assess' you..
For your own safety of course. We don't know what you might be capable of, need to cover all the bases and not make any hasty judgements on your sanity.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright implications are staggering
Who said anything about the consideration element being about sex? hmmmm
And I hate to break it to you but in this regards and because this ruling is a huge outlier over anything any other civil law or common law jurisdiction has or ever will rule in this way on; Germany IS the seasteading state here.
As for human dignity? *snorts* I'm sorry.. dignity requires equity for both parties. In this ruling the person who agreed and now post action has taken back there agreement and anywhere else would be estopped from doing so has totally wiped out the equitable nature of the whole thing.
So basically Germany is only concerned with human dignity when it falls within their extreme moralistic, untenable and unequitable standards that no reasonable human (& that includes the UNHR's here too) would ever agree to.
Seems Germany is going down a very slippery slope again without even realising it (though thankfully not pure Fascism this time)
So in other words it means that there are less and less sensitive snowflakes wanting to become teachers and administrators and the ones that are actually understand all the responsibilities and obligations that go along with the position.
And this is a bad thing??? how?
As for your statement in regards to alleged personal liability [it's actually vicarious liability] when in fact the laws on that have never actually changed, just what people think and are told by MSM (and a bit by the litigious nature of American society currently). Again my original statements above holds true.
What you are basically stating is that No Liability should be allowed against administrators et.al because they in some way are 'better' than anyone else. When in fact they should be held to exactly the same standard as anyone else. That's equitable, that's ethical, and absolutely reasonable, though you are alluding otherwise.
And just so you don't say "but Germany is a civil law and not a common law forum" in regards to estoppel I am also talking about the principle of venire contra factum proprium non valet.
For those not versed in latin ;) it roughly translates to 'no one is allowed to go against the consequences of their own action(s)'
So the German court has wiped that principle out as well.. charming!
So the ruling isn't about contracts you say, and will cause no chilling effects whatsoever for contract law in Germany?
BWahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Do you even know what a contract is both historical and by precedent ? Do you know the elements to a contract? Do you understand even the basic concept of a promissory situation and the ramifications that this actually sets in motion for ANYTHING whether it is private or commercial, and this is before we even go into how this affects the doctrine of estoppel which is a HUGE one.
Oh and whether they are nude pics or whatever is absolutely irrelevant to the precedent this idiotic court has now set.
No, I am saying that the same parents (and websites) who hang them out to dry for over reacting would equally hang them out to dry for under-reacting and something happening. This is the classic no win situation.
Wow.. let me allow you into a little secret.
The bureaucrats who are supposedly "hung out to dry" are PAID to do a job.. if they don';t like the negative feedback that no matter what they do someone wont like gets them then the easy solution is to quit.. If they can't handle the stresses from unreasonable FUD from parents and/or the media then they have no capacity (psychological or otherwise) to be in that position in the first place.
They are beholden to enact reasonable (in the fully legal sense of the word) rules and regulations and to abide by those policies and procedures. If those compliancies are found to be unreasonable by the community then there are protocols in place to change them. Until then they need to act within the reasonableness of the framework.
If you somehow think that this allows 'everyone' to somehow override rules (and laws) etc then you have no idea whatsoever in how laws are formulated, applied or what they are actually designed for. Also it seems you have little understanding of what 'ethics' actually are, and are more than likely conflating them with some set of preconceived values instead of the normative ethics that need to be applied here. Ethics IS NOT about religion. It is the same ethics that lawyers, doctors, et.al work with and need to apply everyday.
In other words you are stating that reasonableness, discretion, nor 'significant threat' doesn't enter into any of the investigative phases whatsoever..
Well in that case shouldn't malfeasance, nonfeasance and vicarious lianbility removing any and all qualified immunity ALSO apply to the bureaucrats and public officials too? hmmm
of is it ok one side to be able to state "but we followed orders" and get away with absolute unethical and unlawful in any other circumstances practices?
So your stating my comment is an emotional reaction and NOT a logical nor reasonable one?
Bwaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha....
Did you actually look at my comments? and how you basically fell for them hook line and sinker and showed how much of a hypocrite you are due to the logic (and social engineering) imbued in them..
The only illogical and emotional person in this scenario is the one you look at every day in the mirror!
On the post: Copyright Troll Malibu Media Tells Court That Its Critics (And Opposing Lawyer) Are Part Of A Psychopathic Hate Group
Re: Re:
Though a caveat is that where I reside there is no such thing as defaming an organisation (only real persons can be defamed) . so maybe I'm just lucky ;)
On the post: Copyright Troll Malibu Media Tells Court That Its Critics (And Opposing Lawyer) Are Part Of A Psychopathic Hate Group
In fact maybe I should consider defamation action and dragging her through the international legal mud. The US immunity structures for attorneys do not hold up in civil filings that can be reasonably shown to be vexatious, malicious and knowingly false towards persons who are NOT parties in any way to the case before the courts.
Personally I think Ms Schulz needs to get off her egotistical high horse of blaming the world for her inadequacies and failures, and instead deal with the case in an ethical and civil way as she has to as an officer of the courts.
Though maybe something like what I just suggested would be a good start to make her have that sharp jolt to her psyche that's most definitely needed. And hey maybe the declaratory judgement I'm thinking of wouldn't have comity in the USA but it would at least mean she wont be flying anywhere outside of the USA for a long long long time.
On the post: Court Calls A Do Over In Terror Hearings After Failure To Record
Re:
On the post: Wil Wheaton Discusses TV, Cord-Cutting, Piracy... And Trying Desperately To Make Sure Fans Can Watch His Show
Re: oh look, he shot his own foot
The reality is, and this scares the hell out of all the marketing companies etc is that advertisement in its current form is barely working anymore. people are becoming either too cynical or too inured by multiple ubiquitous advertising forums for the advertising to actually work anymore.
The solution? Buggered if I know
On the post: Prenda Tries To Weasel Out Of Case It Just Lost At The Appeals Court
Or am I missing some strange procedural structure that the USA has and no where else?
Personally I'd like to see the specify involuntary dismissal WITH prejudice.
On the post: DailyDirt: Should Touch Typing Replace Cursive?
Re: Re: Formulae
On the post: DailyDirt: Should Touch Typing Replace Cursive?
Re: Re: Re: Writing as a study
On the post: DailyDirt: Should Touch Typing Replace Cursive?
Re: Re: Writing as a study
Literacy might be on the rise (and spelling is not really of relevance in this though is a pet peeve of lots of people myself included) though the ability to communicate other than in sound bites and actually retain meaning with that communication and hold conversations IS becoming less and less due to the influx of technology that gives them an illusion that they are multi-tasking on a huge amount of conversations at once, when in fact they are not actually communicating and instead are barely conversing.
I see this constantly in University with students and graduates alike where they try to place everything into small pockets of points that do not flow together and make a whole. Its quite annoying trying to interpret what they are trying to state sometimes.
On the post: DailyDirt: Should Touch Typing Replace Cursive?
Re: Re: Cursive is for quill pens
They take MORE time to do this than using pen/pencil.
On the post: DailyDirt: Should Touch Typing Replace Cursive?
Re: Cursive is for quill pens
It's readable, fast for me to write and though my Capital letters all look like they use "Palmer" in that most of my lowercase are a mix of Getty-Dubay or dare I say it helvetica without even being taught that way.
I still use a paper diary, still write out minutes and also use a form of shorthand that I was taught by my mother who was a stenographer in late 70's too.
I see students trying to grasp with taking notes using a tablet, laptop or even phone but they still take less time to do this than the good old pen/pencil
On the post: German Court Rules Ex-Lovers Must Disappear Consensual Previously Taken Nude Pictures Of The Other
On the post: German Court Rules Ex-Lovers Must Disappear Consensual Previously Taken Nude Pictures Of The Other
Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright implications are staggering
Please read my comments in the order they appear that way context is retained and assumptions don't make you look like well.. you know the old saying about assuming.
On the post: Father Sues School After It Brings In Cops To Question His Son About Drawing Of A Person Being Hanged
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You are clearly suffering from some sort of mental malady and therefore being a concerned human I should now call the appropriate authorities to 'assess' you..
For your own safety of course. We don't know what you might be capable of, need to cover all the bases and not make any hasty judgements on your sanity.
On the post: German Court Rules Ex-Lovers Must Disappear Consensual Previously Taken Nude Pictures Of The Other
Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright implications are staggering
And I hate to break it to you but in this regards and because this ruling is a huge outlier over anything any other civil law or common law jurisdiction has or ever will rule in this way on; Germany IS the seasteading state here.
As for human dignity? *snorts* I'm sorry.. dignity requires equity for both parties. In this ruling the person who agreed and now post action has taken back there agreement and anywhere else would be estopped from doing so has totally wiped out the equitable nature of the whole thing.
So basically Germany is only concerned with human dignity when it falls within their extreme moralistic, untenable and unequitable standards that no reasonable human (& that includes the UNHR's here too) would ever agree to.
Seems Germany is going down a very slippery slope again without even realising it (though thankfully not pure Fascism this time)
On the post: Father Sues School After It Brings In Cops To Question His Son About Drawing Of A Person Being Hanged
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And this is a bad thing??? how?
As for your statement in regards to alleged personal liability [it's actually vicarious liability] when in fact the laws on that have never actually changed, just what people think and are told by MSM (and a bit by the litigious nature of American society currently). Again my original statements above holds true.
What you are basically stating is that No Liability should be allowed against administrators et.al because they in some way are 'better' than anyone else. When in fact they should be held to exactly the same standard as anyone else. That's equitable, that's ethical, and absolutely reasonable, though you are alluding otherwise.
On the post: German Court Rules Ex-Lovers Must Disappear Consensual Previously Taken Nude Pictures Of The Other
Re: Re: Re: Copyright implications are staggering
For those not versed in latin ;) it roughly translates to
'no one is allowed to go against the consequences of their own action(s)'
So the German court has wiped that principle out as well.. charming!
On the post: German Court Rules Ex-Lovers Must Disappear Consensual Previously Taken Nude Pictures Of The Other
Re: Re: Copyright implications are staggering
BWahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Do you even know what a contract is both historical and by precedent ? Do you know the elements to a contract? Do you understand even the basic concept of a promissory situation and the ramifications that this actually sets in motion for ANYTHING whether it is private or commercial, and this is before we even go into how this affects the doctrine of estoppel which is a HUGE one.
Oh and whether they are nude pics or whatever is absolutely irrelevant to the precedent this idiotic court has now set.
On the post: Father Sues School After It Brings In Cops To Question His Son About Drawing Of A Person Being Hanged
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Wow.. let me allow you into a little secret.
The bureaucrats who are supposedly "hung out to dry" are PAID to do a job.. if they don';t like the negative feedback that no matter what they do someone wont like gets them then the easy solution is to quit.. If they can't handle the stresses from unreasonable FUD from parents and/or the media then they have no capacity (psychological or otherwise) to be in that position in the first place.
They are beholden to enact reasonable (in the fully legal sense of the word) rules and regulations and to abide by those policies and procedures. If those compliancies are found to be unreasonable by the community then there are protocols in place to change them. Until then they need to act within the reasonableness of the framework.
If you somehow think that this allows 'everyone' to somehow override rules (and laws) etc then you have no idea whatsoever in how laws are formulated, applied or what they are actually designed for. Also it seems you have little understanding of what 'ethics' actually are, and are more than likely conflating them with some set of preconceived values instead of the normative ethics that need to be applied here. Ethics IS NOT about religion. It is the same ethics that lawyers, doctors, et.al work with and need to apply everyday.
On the post: Father Sues School After It Brings In Cops To Question His Son About Drawing Of A Person Being Hanged
Re: Re:
Well in that case shouldn't malfeasance, nonfeasance and vicarious lianbility removing any and all qualified immunity ALSO apply to the bureaucrats and public officials too? hmmm
of is it ok one side to be able to state "but we followed orders" and get away with absolute unethical and unlawful in any other circumstances practices?
On the post: Europeans Club Google Over The Head At A Rate Of 1,000 Requests Per Hour After Its Search Engine Amnesia Tool Goes Live
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Bwaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha....
Did you actually look at my comments? and how you basically fell for them hook line and sinker and showed how much of a hypocrite you are due to the logic (and social engineering) imbued in them..
The only illogical and emotional person in this scenario is the one you look at every day in the mirror!
Thanks for the laugh though I needed one..
Bwahahahahahahahahaahaha
Next >>