If the Government is horrible at keeping secrets, why in the world would we put them in charge of our privacy?
Privacy rules aren't about preventing the leaks or theft of data (irregular events that organizations don't intentionally cause and don't want to happen), but about restricting what can be done with data (regular processes that organizations do intentionally cause and do want to happen). So skills a privacy aren't logically connected to skills at keeping secrets.
Legally speaking, Ayyadurai's claim that he is the inventor of email is an opinion based on cited facts.
What about calling Ayyadurai a liar/fraud? Is calling someone a liar/fraud because of an opinion based on cited facts defamatory? Or is it itself an opinion based on cited facts?
Does anyone have any details on the German law banning "fake news"? Does it fine/imprison end user who link to or repeat news judged to be fake? Merely require that the social media platform black URLs to articles deemed to be fake? What?
Having only have read his first tweet, I thought Woods was trying to deceive people into thinking that the John Doe had realized the futility of his fight, had given up and was waiting for Woods to steam-roller him. But in reality it's worse that that. Ugh.
1) If the sentence before is the problem, that's what the complaint should mention.
2) If that previous sentence is defamatory, it's defamatory against Donald Trump, not Melania, as the story neither states nor implies that Melania was complicit with what Trump did.
So, once again, we have a major Hollywood entertainment entity -- which has been insisting for years that Google and others should "just know" when something is infringing and take it down and block all future infringements -- who can't even properly identify the content that it's claiming to hold the copyright over.
No, see, they spend the minimum amount of money possible to create the bots, so naturally the bots get made by incompetent programmers. But Google has a bunch of super-genius programmers who can do anything.
... since [lawyer] had reviewed firsthand many of the emails ...
I had thought this was a genuine issue of attorney/client communication. I'd never have dreamed that someone would try to claim that their lawyer reviewing a document transforms it into attorney/client communication.
Time after time their methods and "invented" tests could not survive a Daubert challenge were it not for the FBIs ability to force publication in journals.
On the post: Patent Trolling Lawyers May Have Picked With The Wrong Company To Shake Down: Cloudflare Hits Back
Re: Re: Re: I support journalism
How does a comment from an anonymous commenter say anything, one way or another, about the authors of this site?
On the post: Patent Trolling Lawyers May Have Picked With The Wrong Company To Shake Down: Cloudflare Hits Back
Hamiltonian?
Who's the "Hamiltonian" that get's referenced here at TD?
On the post: The Weird Antitrust Questions Of A Google Chrome Ad Blocker
Re:
Curious: how many exploits can be done with scripting but without plugins?
On the post: EU Plans To Weaken Encrypted Communications Despite Countless Warnings It Can't Be Done Safely
Re: Re: Re:
Privacy rules aren't about preventing the leaks or theft of data (irregular events that organizations don't intentionally cause and don't want to happen), but about restricting what can be done with data (regular processes that organizations do intentionally cause and do want to happen). So skills a privacy aren't logically connected to skills at keeping secrets.
On the post: James Comey's New Idea: An International Encryption Backdoor Partnership
Re: Re: What do you want to bet...
Could you provide a reference for this, or at least some keywords to search for? My Google-fu has been unable to turn up anything.
On the post: Georgia Lawmakers Look To Go Down Porn-Censoring Unconstitutional Rabbit Hole
Here's the complete text of the proposed law.
On the post: New Filings In Our Ongoing Lawsuit
Re: Re: Re:
What about calling Ayyadurai a liar/fraud? Is calling someone a liar/fraud because of an opinion based on cited facts defamatory? Or is it itself an opinion based on cited facts?
On the post: General Franco Is Still Dead And Michelle Lee Is Still Director Of The US Patent Office
On the post: Trump Administration Wants A Clean Reauthorization For NSA Surveillance
Re:
??????
On the post: 'Fake News' Now Means Whatever People Want It To Mean, And Legislating It Away Is A Slippery Slope Toward Censorship
Details of the German ban law?
On the post: South Carolina Senator Wants To Charge Computer Purchasers $20 To Access Internet Porn
Re: Re: Reload windows
...
Oh, wait, the Senator didn't think about things like that. Nevermind.
On the post: Ridiculous German Court Ruling Means Linking Online Is Now A Liability
Re: They are fighting for their culture
On the post: Actor James Woods Gloats Over Death Of Random Twitter Troll He Sued To Unmask [Updated]
On the post: Charles Harder Sends Ridiculous Threat Letter To People On Behalf Of Melania Trump
Re: Re: Not defamation
2) If that previous sentence is defamatory, it's defamatory against Donald Trump, not Melania, as the story neither states nor implies that Melania was complicit with what Trump did.
On the post: Charles Harder Sends Ridiculous Threat Letter To People On Behalf Of Melania Trump
Re: Not defamation
On the post: Charles Harder Sends Ridiculous Threat Letter To People On Behalf Of Melania Trump
"Come after you personally"
On the post: NYPD Says Releasing Basic Stingray Contract Info Will Result In A Supercriminal Apocalypse
Unredactable?
On the post: Another Day, Another Anomaly: Paramount Issues DMCA Takedown On Ubuntu Linux Torrent
On the post: Mayor Who Sued His Own City Over A Public Records Request Ordered To Turn Over Official Emails Stashed In A Private Account
... since [lawyer] had reviewed firsthand many of the emails ...
On the post: Agent's Testimony Shows FBI Not All That Interested In Ensuring The Integrity Of Its Forensic Evidence
Forced publication...
Next >>