Strange. Our cert seems to be properly covering both www. and non-www. variants in most places, but it's having some trouble on mobile (and with twitter's link-scraper, it seems). Thanks for the heads up - we're trying to get it sorted out, and for now I've added the www. to the other links in the post.
a) Copyright is not supposed to cover underlying ideas, only fixed expressions b) Copyright is not supposed to cover purely functional choices, only expressive ones
it has to turn something that didn't have DRM into something that does have DRM
By ensconcing EME in the standards for the web, it turns every browser into something that has DRM. (Except those that take a principled stand by violating the standards).
But there's a huge fucking difference between being an Aaron Swartz liberal, and being a Clinton liberal
So given that we have written numerous posts in praise and defence of Aaron Swartz, and virtually none (if any) in praise of Hillary Clinton (amidst many criticizing her) I have to wonder what website you are talking about, since it sure aint this one.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's take the emotion out of it...
It is impossible to have a productive discussion about economics with someone as intellectually dishonest and/or stupid as you are.
If you cannot or will not even acknowledge the difference between Obama's Iraq refugee screening and Trump's all-out immigration ban, then you are not mature enough to understand even basic economic concepts, and certainly not worth having a whole debate about them with.
Yeah it "broadened Obama's a little" from increased screening processes for refugees from one country to flat-out immigration bans for anyone from seven countries. And from covering 33-million people to to 218-million. Y'know, "a little".
Slightly less of the black vote than GWB. Considerably less of the Hispanic vote than Bush Sr. or Reagan. Lowest portion of the Asian vote in the entire time that demographic has been tracked.
Stop relying solely on one single interpretation of the numbers.
Mason, we get it: you really like that one article.
Consider: the author of that article does not claim racism is not involved or that Trump doesn't have racist tendencies, in direct contradiction to your assertion that "racism is simply not a factor here". So you are already in disagreement with the article.
Consider furthermore: one semi-anonymous blogger is not the final word on what constitutes racism.
Consider in summation: stop harping on one goddamn article as though it proves you are the smartest person in the world and everyone who disagrees with you is tragically uninformed.
Which crusade are you referring to? The one where the Christians slaughtered all the Jews in Europe, or the one where they gave up and decided to sack Constantinople? Deus Vult!
Re: Re: Re: Again with the racism and hitler references
And if you are getting offended about the tiny handful of pedo comments
I assure you, nobody is "offended" by your continued insistence on making yourself look childish and foolish. Enlightened as to your true nature? Yes. Offended? Nah.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: To me it is 1st. a math problem, 2. what's in it for the USA?
So, you're totally incapable of taking even one second to acknowledge the shared burden of human beings, and instead go straight to paranoid NWO nonsense.
Looks like you rejected the whole message about humanity too.
In your view, what is the positive impact of any of this? I see you cheering for the destruction of a film, and relishing in the possible personal legal/financial devastation of an artist. I am genuinely confused as to why.
On the post: Techdirt Survival Fund: I Support Journalism
Re: Re: Bad cert?
On the post: How Is 'Non-Literally Copying' Code Still Copyright Infringement?
Re: Oh come on, it's not that hard to understand.
a) Copyright is not supposed to cover underlying ideas, only fixed expressions
b) Copyright is not supposed to cover purely functional choices, only expressive ones
?
On the post: The Codification Of Web DRM As A Censorship Tool
Re: DRM and Browsers...
On the post: The Codification Of Web DRM As A Censorship Tool
Re: Can someone explain this passage?
it has to turn something that didn't have DRM into something that does have DRM
By ensconcing EME in the standards for the web, it turns every browser into something that has DRM. (Except those that take a principled stand by violating the standards).
Plus, sometimes, the vulnerability is in the EME implementation itself - https://boingboing.net/2016/06/24/googles-version-of-the-w3c.html
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Incredible
So given that we have written numerous posts in praise and defence of Aaron Swartz, and virtually none (if any) in praise of Hillary Clinton (amidst many criticizing her) I have to wonder what website you are talking about, since it sure aint this one.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's take the emotion out of it...
If you cannot or will not even acknowledge the difference between Obama's Iraq refugee screening and Trump's all-out immigration ban, then you are not mature enough to understand even basic economic concepts, and certainly not worth having a whole debate about them with.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Let's take the emotion out of it...
Stop being obtuse.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-polarization-analysis-idUSKBN13I10B
Slightly less of the black vote than GWB. Considerably less of the Hispanic vote than Bush Sr. or Reagan. Lowest portion of the Asian vote in the entire time that demographic has been tracked.
Stop relying solely on one single interpretation of the numbers.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Consider: the author of that article does not claim racism is not involved or that Trump doesn't have racist tendencies, in direct contradiction to your assertion that "racism is simply not a factor here". So you are already in disagreement with the article.
Consider furthermore: one semi-anonymous blogger is not the final word on what constitutes racism.
Consider in summation: stop harping on one goddamn article as though it proves you are the smartest person in the world and everyone who disagrees with you is tragically uninformed.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: All in Time - Its about trust
11:58am: re-read your history dipshit
12:10pm: We are talking about current events right????
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: All in Time - Its about trust
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Again with the racism and hitler references
And if you are getting offended about the tiny handful of pedo comments
I assure you, nobody is "offended" by your continued insistence on making yourself look childish and foolish. Enlightened as to your true nature? Yes. Offended? Nah.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: To me it is 1st. a math problem, 2. what's in it for the USA?
Looks like you rejected the whole message about humanity too.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: To me it is 1st. a math problem, 2. what's in it for the USA?
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: To me it is 1st. a math problem, 2. what's in it for the USA?
I don't give 2 shits what you're running from, only what you bring to the table.
Guess you missed the whole message about "humanity", huh?
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re:
Usually people who say this are just desperately looking for an excuse to avoid confronting an issue.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Format
On the post: CBS & Paramount Finally Settle With Fan Film Axanar
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: CBS & Paramount Finally Settle With Fan Film Axanar
Re:
In your view, what is the positive impact of any of this? I see you cheering for the destruction of a film, and relishing in the possible personal legal/financial devastation of an artist. I am genuinely confused as to why.
Next >>