If the content had some fair market value as determined by other transactions and it was licensed for nothing to a campaign, that's the value of the contribution.
If a campaign infringes and the rights holder does not assert their rights, I suspect an electoral law judge would see it as a contribution.
If a campaign infringes and the rights holder does assert their rights and demands payment, let the games begin!
I suspect you'd have to modify your brain to interpret those signals as well. Otherwise, the same neurons firing would go to the same places in your brain. You'd just see the same red.
if the material is covered under fair dealing, then yes, the argument fails. But it is an interesting angle. If someone did have to license material for a campaign and did not do so, I agree it would count as a contribution in kind.
FDA won't approve anyone making the old version because it isn't safe and now there's a safer alternative. That isn't a patent issue. This decision was probably in the works but they rushed it to coincide with the patent expiring to stop anyone from manufacturing it the old way.
I feel ripped off by this article. It did not deliver it's promised dosage of anti-patent content. Articles that stretch their point like this don't help the cause, they hurt it, and make it hard for me to get friends interested.
Absolutely! Allowing strong encryption is a direct consequence of your right to remain silent. That's one reason why encryption was allowed domestically but you were forbidden to export it.
The headline of this article is misleading. The graphic doesn't say anywhere that not liking the lender is cause for default. It does state these things are correlated. But tise article is just a straw man argument.
On the post: Lehman's Bankruptcy Worked Out Well For Intel, Anyway
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wall-streets-naked-swindle-20100405
On the post: OxyContin And The Art Of 'Evergreening'
Re: Extending drug patents?
On the post: Canadian Politician Uses Nutty Hybrid Copyright Complaint In Attempt To Stifle Criticism
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Canadian Politician Uses Nutty Hybrid Copyright Complaint In Attempt To Stifle Criticism
Re: Re:
If a campaign infringes and the rights holder does not assert their rights, I suspect an electoral law judge would see it as a contribution.
If a campaign infringes and the rights holder does assert their rights and demands payment, let the games begin!
On the post: OxyContin And The Art Of 'Evergreening'
Re:
On the post: According To MN State Auditors, Success In The Music Biz Means Signing With A Major Label; Not Touring
On the post: DailyDirt: Seeing In Color
On the post: Canadian Politician Uses Nutty Hybrid Copyright Complaint In Attempt To Stifle Criticism
On the post: OxyContin And The Art Of 'Evergreening'
I feel ripped off by this article. It did not deliver it's promised dosage of anti-patent content. Articles that stretch their point like this don't help the cause, they hurt it, and make it hard for me to get friends interested.
On the post: Jaron Lanier And Gobbledygook Economics
On the post: Judge Says Giving Up Your Password May Be A 5th Amendment Violation
On the post: CipherCloud Discovers Senorita Streisand Effect Is A Hateful Mistress
On the post: McAfee Patents System To 'Detect And Prevent Illegal Consumption Of Content On The Internet'
On the post: If You Don’t 'Like' Your Student Loan Servicer on Facebook, You Will Default
On the post: U.S. Ambassador To Australia Takes On #1 Issue Of The Day: Game Of Thrones Piracy
On the post: NYC Mayor Bloomberg Thinks Boston Bombing Renders The Constitution Obsolete
I bet he would say, "Fuck no, asshole, are you crazy?"
On the post: IRS Says It Will Change Its Policy On Looking At Emails Without A Warrant... At Some Point
On the post: The Copyright Lobotomy: How Intellectual Property Makes Us Pretend To Be Stupid
On the post: Fox Uses Bogus DMCA Claims To Censor Cory Doctorow's Book About Censorship
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: He should
On the post: Fox Uses Bogus DMCA Claims To Censor Cory Doctorow's Book About Censorship
Next >>