Which would last all of a tenth of a second as everyone who now has to rebuy all their music (cause you KNOW the music industry would insist on it) to be able to hear it on their new Bignamemusiccompany player would say.. Hell no. It would do absolutely nothing to deter infringement.
Real Patriots don't use every legal loophole their lawyers can find to avoid paying taxes. Real Patriots don't say 'It's too expensive to run this call center in the US, so lets hire some Indians who can barely speak English to do it for us.'
If I were EMI or Men Down Under, I would remind Larrikin that 5% of nothing.. is nothing. And pull any product that has that song from the shelves that they are legally able to and deny an broadcast/performance rights to anyone requesting the use of the song.
Yes I know it is a bit of cutting off ones nose to spite its face, but if Larrikin is going to be a dick about something written 80 years ago and should have been in the public domain to begin with then to hell with them (Larrikin and company).
They (EA) later claimed that there was some kind of settings error on the back end that resulted in a forum ban also making it an entire system ban. Thus the man wasn't able to get into the authentication server to activate his game.
"The first two, 17 U.S.C. 506 and 18 U.S.C. 2319(b)(1), are criminal copyright infringement. The third, 18 U.S.C. 2, is aiding and abetting.
I believe the court in this case will shred all of your FUD surrounding these seizures. I also believe that the court will make clear that linking sites are aiders and abettors."
So.. Google is next right? After all their search engine provides links.
As a player of DnD for 11 years now I have seen a great many DMs. The good ones don't tell the players what to do, they merely tell the players what happens when they make their own decisions.
On the post: Why Google Should Buy The Recording Industry
Re:
On the post: EU Getting Ready To Vote On Unnecessary Copyright Extension
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What is that public to do?
On the post: MPAA: Real Patriots Don't Share
Re:
On the post: MPAA: Real Patriots Don't Share
On the post: Appeals Court Still Says 'Down Under' Infringes On Decades Old Folk Song
Yes I know it is a bit of cutting off ones nose to spite its face, but if Larrikin is going to be a dick about something written 80 years ago and should have been in the public domain to begin with then to hell with them (Larrikin and company).
On the post: Another Court Rejects Idea That DMCA Requires Proactive Approach From Service Providers
Re: Re:
On the post: EA: Banned From Forums? Can't Play Single-Player Game Either
They Claim
On the post: ICE Arrests Operator Of Seized Domain; Charges Him With Criminal Copyright Infringement
Re: Re: Re: Re: Read this earlier
On the post: ICE Arrests Operator Of Seized Domain; Charges Him With Criminal Copyright Infringement
Re:
I believe the court in this case will shred all of your FUD surrounding these seizures. I also believe that the court will make clear that linking sites are aiders and abettors."
So.. Google is next right? After all their search engine provides links.
On the post: Court Says Playing Dungeons & Dragons In Prisons Represents Gang Behavior
Good GMs
On the post: Steam Engine Society Forced To Sell Steam Engine Because 13 Photographers Might Have (But Probably Didn't) See Article
Contractual obligations
Next >>