Gawker published intimate video (made without his consent) of Hulk Hogan having sex with someone else's wife, which he wasn't aware of before it was published. Not okay. Damn creepy, if you ask me.
Eh, Google penalises attempts to game the system. A smarter way around it is to use each of the keywords separately as much as possible but to give the full description to images and headers. You then mix in the other words separately. The story would then go
*#Carroll, Iowa police officer Jacob Smith sues local paper for defamation over 'pedophile' comment, true facts
The Carroll Times Herald is being sued over an article detailing an investigation and disciplinary proceedings against Jacob Smith, who has since been dismissed from the local police force.*
You then sprinkle in the town's name, state, occupation/department, and the name of the officer throughout the article. Subheadings should have separate references and should not read like an SEO farm.
I believe the most stupid thing you can ever do is consent to such pictures being taken. ALWAYS assume that any kind of picture at all will be shared with the world and his dog. If it's innocuous (like my talented colleague's pumpkin carving), no harm, no foul if it gets out. If it's deeply personal and private (parts), it can cause a great deal of distress and embarrassment if it gets out.
Don't take or allow such pictures to be taken. Why is this difficult?
Convince them it's a Dem bill to generate $$$ for Democratic candidates. Get the GOP Senate to destroy it to own the libs. Then take a long hot shower to wash away that horrible feeling you get when you know you've done something below the line of acceptable discourse. I'm sorry for even suggesting it but that's the world we live in.
Re: If someone's trying to stab you make them WORK for it
Remember, the pro-copyright brigade believe that copyright holder = creative. They also believe that copyright is a fountain flowing deep and wide (copyright ownership guarantees $$$) and that due process is an impediment to justice. When you argue with them, remember these points.
When you get politicians trying to write legislation without truly understanding what's happening, you get an end result that that doesn't solve the actual problem of ____, and only serves to make life worse for people who have the least power in the situation in the first place.
This is one of those quotes I'll be wheeling out over and over and over again because it applies in so many areas. Politicians are too quick to write legislation in areas they have no expertise in, and won't work with people who actually understand those issues. That needs to stop. Now.
Besides, do you think anyone could wrest the users of Facebook, YouTube, or Twitter on the cheap? Do you think any of these three has minimal physical infrastructure?
On the post: Cop's Bogus Defamation Lawsuit Nearly Puts A Small Iowa Newspaper Out Of Business
Re:
Gawker published intimate video (made without his consent) of Hulk Hogan having sex with someone else's wife, which he wasn't aware of before it was published. Not okay. Damn creepy, if you ask me.
On the post: Cop's Bogus Defamation Lawsuit Nearly Puts A Small Iowa Newspaper Out Of Business
Re: Re:
Eh, Google penalises attempts to game the system. A smarter way around it is to use each of the keywords separately as much as possible but to give the full description to images and headers. You then mix in the other words separately. The story would then go
*#Carroll, Iowa police officer Jacob Smith sues local paper for defamation over 'pedophile' comment, true facts
The Carroll Times Herald is being sued over an article detailing an investigation and disciplinary proceedings against Jacob Smith, who has since been dismissed from the local police force.*
You then sprinkle in the town's name, state, occupation/department, and the name of the officer throughout the article. Subheadings should have separate references and should not read like an SEO farm.
You're welcome.
--I actually read up on the subject--
On the post: Illinois Supreme Court Says State's Revenge Porn Law Is Constitutional While Barely Trying To Apply The Constitution To It
Re: Re: Re: So what's next
I believe the most stupid thing you can ever do is consent to such pictures being taken. ALWAYS assume that any kind of picture at all will be shared with the world and his dog. If it's innocuous (like my talented colleague's pumpkin carving), no harm, no foul if it gets out. If it's deeply personal and private (parts), it can cause a great deal of distress and embarrassment if it gets out.
Don't take or allow such pictures to be taken. Why is this difficult?
On the post: Bringing Free Speech Back: Trump Promises To Sue CNN Over Its Biased Coverage Based On Dumbest Legal Theory Ever
Re: Re: Complexities
James, I'm not a mad fan of Trump but apparently he actually does donate his salary per his election promise. Very impressive for a proven liar.
Of course, he also claws this back (and then some) by staying at his own properties instead of using the facilities provided by the state.
On the post: Canadian Supreme Court To Cops: You Can't Arrest Someone Just Because You Think Something Illegal Might Happen In The Future
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You had to attend CoE church services or pay a fine.
On the post: Bad Laws And The Best Of Intentions: Law Designed To 'Protect' Gig Workers May Destroy Journalism Freelancers
Re:
I don't need or want any government protection
You'd be screaming for it if the ones you didn't notice were gone.
On the post: Bad Laws And The Best Of Intentions: Law Designed To 'Protect' Gig Workers May Destroy Journalism Freelancers
Re: Re:
Logic and good sense isn't going to convince him, AC. Idiotology does that.
On the post: Congress Looks To Rush Through Unconstitutional Pro-Copyright Trolls Bill, Despite Promising To Explore Alternatives
Re: Re: Re: It's like SOPA all over again
Convince them it's a Dem bill to generate $$$ for Democratic candidates. Get the GOP Senate to destroy it to own the libs. Then take a long hot shower to wash away that horrible feeling you get when you know you've done something below the line of acceptable discourse. I'm sorry for even suggesting it but that's the world we live in.
On the post: Congress Looks To Rush Through Unconstitutional Pro-Copyright Trolls Bill, Despite Promising To Explore Alternatives
Re: Re:
That twerp will stop wishing death on people when THE problem becomes HIS problem. I'll never understand it, but that's how it works.
On the post: Congress Looks To Rush Through Unconstitutional Pro-Copyright Trolls Bill, Despite Promising To Explore Alternatives
Re: If someone's trying to stab you make them WORK for it
Remember, the pro-copyright brigade believe that copyright holder = creative. They also believe that copyright is a fountain flowing deep and wide (copyright ownership guarantees $$$) and that due process is an impediment to justice. When you argue with them, remember these points.
On the post: Bad Laws And The Best Of Intentions: Law Designed To 'Protect' Gig Workers May Destroy Journalism Freelancers
Re: Re: What free market?
To clarify, I meant that the market will not provide a solution that will work for workers.
On the post: Congress Looks To Rush Through Unconstitutional Pro-Copyright Trolls Bill, Despite Promising To Explore Alternatives
Re: Re:
That's a feature, not a bug.
On the post: Congress Looks To Rush Through Unconstitutional Pro-Copyright Trolls Bill, Despite Promising To Explore Alternatives
It's like SOPA all over again
That Congress is rushing this through, ignoring all the concerns, is a travesty and should not be allowed.
Yep, just like SOPA. I suppose they've all had enough of experts.
On the post: Bad Laws And The Best Of Intentions: Law Designed To 'Protect' Gig Workers May Destroy Journalism Freelancers
Re: Re: 'You shut up when I'm talking for you!'
I can see that coming back to bite her in the form of attack ads. She brought it on herself.
On the post: Bad Laws And The Best Of Intentions: Law Designed To 'Protect' Gig Workers May Destroy Journalism Freelancers
Re: What free market?
It is hard to feel sorry when it was the journalist them selves asking for this in the first place.
It's reasonable to want protection from abuse by employers in a rigged market.
Asking government to regulate a perceived problem away is never going to work out as well as letting the free market come to a solution.
If the market is rigged in favour of employers and is emphatically not a level playing field, it's not free and there will be no solution.
On the post: Bad Laws And The Best Of Intentions: Law Designed To 'Protect' Gig Workers May Destroy Journalism Freelancers
When you get politicians trying to write legislation without truly understanding what's happening, you get an end result that that doesn't solve the actual problem of ____, and only serves to make life worse for people who have the least power in the situation in the first place.
This is one of those quotes I'll be wheeling out over and over and over again because it applies in so many areas. Politicians are too quick to write legislation in areas they have no expertise in, and won't work with people who actually understand those issues. That needs to stop. Now.
On the post: DOJ's Latest Child Porn Site Takedown Shows Encryption Isn't Really Stopping The Feds From Fighting Child Porn
Re: Why should they care about hurt children?
THAT is the problem.
On the post: AT&T Jacks Up Broadband Rates With Misleading 'Property Tax' Fee
Re: Re: Re:
Besides, do you think anyone could wrest the users of Facebook, YouTube, or Twitter on the cheap? Do you think any of these three has minimal physical infrastructure?
Yet other social networks exist.
On the post: After Four Years Of Failing To Bring Its Plan To Completion, UK Government Pulls Out Of Porn Blockade Effort
Re: Re: Re: Brexit?
It's too limp to get through.
I'll show myself out.
On the post: After Four Years Of Failing To Bring Its Plan To Completion, UK Government Pulls Out Of Porn Blockade Effort
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If the Tories were truly all about law and order they wouldn't demand that the police do more with less. They're an absolute shambles!
Next >>