Re: Bah. Innovation as defined around here is pretty meh
Yes becasue using a cell phone for filming is solely the domain of youtube. You might want to check out a movie that was in theatres recently, called "The Avengers" I hear it had a couple dollar budget and earned a few sheckels. They publicly stated that some scenes were filmed with an iPhone.
They aren't a replacement yet, but they are good enough to be used in some situations.
Or if you are interested in long form content you might look at the Tromafilms channel on youtube. or look at the 3D channel on youtube, or look at ultra-high res videos (assuming you have a display capable of showing 4K content.) Some things will succeed, others will fail. If you don't try new things it is inevitable that you will eventually fail.
What everyone seems to be forgetting is that Ebersman works for the majority stockholder. Until Mark Zuckerberg loses control of the company or decides he doesn't need his skills anymore he isn't going anywhere. Last I heard Zuckerberg has enough voting stock to override everyone else combined.
So maybe the first order response should be to adjust the Hugo rules so that broadcast media properties are not eligible until there is some sanity in the system. This will solve the problem of the award show getting pulled even if clips are cleared. I suspect that the impacts would be less sci-fi on TV and other deserving content receiving awards.
I think they should allow them the publicity rights claim. Then hit them with a judgement for 40 years of back taxes on the publicity rights as applicable tax fraud. I also thick the estates current representation should be held personally and professionally liable for not paying appropriate taxes based on the publicity rights that didn't actually exist for most of the 40 years. If the state of California can collect it might take a small bite out of the state deficit.
Why can't we go to a patent system where a working model must be submitted with the application. Having an idea is great, but you don't get a patent unless you can prove that it can be made into an actual device or product. Also assess a storage fee for the model tied to how long the inventor wants patent protection. This way a company could secure their patent protection for a shorter time for a reduced cost if they are in a field that is rapidly changing.
Considering the calibre of lawyers working for the record industry the artist probably does own all of the legal risk, while the label holds all the legal benefit. Didn't Eminem's label try to charge legal fees for defending themselves against him when he sued to get what was owed to him?
Actually mil-spec mostly means that there is most likely a pile of paper in a warehouse somewhere detailing the each step of the manufacturing process with someone's signature on it. When the pile of paper exceeds the weight of the part it may be ready to ship.
Copyrights were probably assigned to the "Authors" and as far as I know all of the material was donated to create the book so there is no provision for royalties to be paid. The whole thing was a collosal and apparently profitable joke.
Doesn't the DMCA include a $500 fine for takedown requests made in bad faith? Seems like someone could probably go after Scripps for $500 per invalid notice plus court costs. Unfortunately for anyone who could reasonably afford to press the suit to a successful conclusion $500 is pocket change.
This level of bizarre behavior has me starting to wonder if there is something physically wrong in his brain. What would it take to force him to see a psychologist and/or force him to have a CT scan or MRI to prove that he doesn't have a brain tumor that would be affecting his behavior.
For what it is worth it isn't worth my time to steal music. It also isn't worht my time to indulge in copyright infringement of music. It is worth my time to do a quick background check at RIAA-radar prior to purchasing music to ensure that I am not finacially supporting people who oppose everything that makes the internet great.
On the post: First HADOPI Victim Convicted, Not For His Own Infringement, But Because His Wife Downloaded Songs
Re:
On the post: The Math Says HBO Shouldn't Go Direct, But They Left Innovation Out Of The Equation
Re: Bah. Innovation as defined around here is pretty meh
They aren't a replacement yet, but they are good enough to be used in some situations.
Or if you are interested in long form content you might look at the Tromafilms channel on youtube. or look at the 3D channel on youtube, or look at ultra-high res videos (assuming you have a display capable of showing 4K content.) Some things will succeed, others will fail. If you don't try new things it is inevitable that you will eventually fail.
On the post: Can Someone Explain Why Facebook's CFO Should Be Fired For Getting An Awesome Deal?
On the post: Copyright Enforcement Bots Seek And Destroy Hugo Awards
On the post: Marilyn Monroe's Persona Belongs To The Public; Estate Can't Retroactively Move Her To California
On the post: Is A 'Patent First, Develop Second' Approach Promoting The Progress?
On the post: Universal Music Sued Because 62% Of A Bow Wow Video Is Actually A French Porn Star's Music Video
Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't that be...
On the post: Honest Mistake: Order A TV From Amazon, Receive An Illegal Assault Rifle
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Crowdsourced Erotic Fiction Novel Hits #4 On The iTunes Charts
Re:
On the post: Curiosity's Mars Landing Video Disappears From YouTube Due To Bogus Copyright Claim
On the post: Charles Carreon Tries To Intimidate Parodist With Bizarre List Of Demands Plus DMCA Takedown Threat
On the post: Dear Judge Koh: Competition Is No Reason To Ban A Phone
Re: Re: Re:
FYI the square is a special type of rectangle where all sides are the same length. Something with a 16:9 aspect ratio is nothing but a rectangle.
On the post: Want To Be A 'Signed' Musician? Any And All Records Will Take You
Re: Re:
Next >>