I know self adhesive tokens have been around a while, but when did they start doing that with wrappers? All the (standard size no bubble wrap) ones I see still require a lickin.
I don't have any figures on console vs PC piracy, but console piracy is at least something which is common. From Pandora's battery on the PSP to modchips in Xboxes to softmods on Wiis to CFW and flashcarts on the N/3DS, or even the simplest of all, burning a cd for a Dreamcast.
You can always just set up a RetroPie system instead. From what I saw in the TASbot section of this years AGDQ, the NES classic is evidently not that great an emulator. RetroPie can do a lot more than just NES games too.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: All in Time - Its about trust
I'm not quite getting your point here, Roger. It is true that facts tend to have a left wing bias, but I fail to see what that has to do with the AC's comment of
>thanks for puttin dat libcuck in his place
>can you use a link that is not wikipedia? it has too many libfacts on there.
nor with my proceeding comment pointing out that terrorist attacks in the US do not at all match the earlier AC's comment that the majority of terrorist attacks in the last decade have been by domestic white people.
Honestly, I mostly agree with you, but lets try to be accurate here. #2 in your list (yours, not his, since you had the courtesy to give us numbered points) is quite wrong. ILLEGAL immigrants are biased towards the less educated. And yes, he was speaking about illegals. It's called context.
Context applies to the whole thing. He was referring to illegal immigration in that whole quote. Illegal immigrants tend towards the less educated, and therefore the less able.
#3 I can't disagree.
#4 Wrong. Those who are motivated to emigrate don't just up and say "Gosh! My comfy middle-to-upper class is just so restricting!" They're almost always either poor or persecuted. And yes, that's an argument in favor of taking them, assuming they've been vetted.
#5 Wut indeed.
#5(2) Total crime levels changing has nothing to do with a given population being a disproportionate source of crime.
#6 You're agreeing with Trump here. Literally. Context again.
Mattis has strongly stated his opposition to torture last I heard. But I'm curious about this hypothetical Trump coup. How does a guy who's ALREADY president have a coup? Like, if there was/is/could be a coup, wouldn't it have already happened and he won? He's president, there's no higher office to seize.
This is yet another case where should and do strongly diverge. We should be able to expect privacy in all our communications, no matter whether a third party is involved. That shit's a government cop-out by people with no respect for the constitution nor the ideals it helps codify.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
I am refuting two things. First, that there is a religious test denying entry (lower priorities in a specific subset of cases are not the same as rejections), and second, that anyone is exempt from the ban. Anything further than that I am not refuting in the slightest, nor attempting to.
The actual 'Mexicans are rapists and murderers' quote:
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
Yes, that is indeed the section of the executive order which I already quoted. I'll quote from the proceeding comments which you seemingly didn't bother to read, with some extra bolding to help you out:
"Upon resumption" means that AFTER the ban ends, minority religions will get prioritised in cases in which they claim asylum from religious persecution.
There is no exemption from the ban based on religion.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
Uh, maybe you should go re-read it again-again. I'll copy paste the relevant section here.
"(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization."
"Upon resumption" means that AFTER the ban ends, minority religions will get prioritised in cases in which they claim asylum from religious persecution.
There is no exemption from the ban based on religion.
There is no religious test DENYING entry.
(Atheists should certainly get to claim religious persecution)
On the post: Congress Prepares To Gut Net Neutrality With Bills Pretending To Save It
Re:
If you'd like to change that opinion, try posting something substansive.
On the post: Congress Prepares To Gut Net Neutrality With Bills Pretending To Save It
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: RIP Denuvo: Resident Evil 7 Cracked In Five Days
Re: Re: Lol
On the post: FBI Continues To Demand Far More Info Than It's Supposed To With Its National Security Letters
On the post: Daily Deal: NES Classic Giveaway
Re:
On the post: Not Only Is Steve Bannon Sitting In On National Security Meetings, The Usual Paper Trail Is Disappearing
Re: The Right Thing
It just goes to show how little arguments you have for anything when you have to resort to deception.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: All in Time - Its about trust
>thanks for puttin dat libcuck in his place
>can you use a link that is not wikipedia? it has too many libfacts on there.
nor with my proceeding comment pointing out that terrorist attacks in the US do not at all match the earlier AC's comment that the majority of terrorist attacks in the last decade have been by domestic white people.
I backed my shit up with links. I await y'all's.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: All in Time - Its about trust
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
I corrected a falsehood, and went no further.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Context applies to the whole thing. He was referring to illegal immigration in that whole quote. Illegal immigrants tend towards the less educated, and therefore the less able.
#3 I can't disagree.
#4 Wrong. Those who are motivated to emigrate don't just up and say "Gosh! My comfy middle-to-upper class is just so restricting!" They're almost always either poor or persecuted. And yes, that's an argument in favor of taking them, assuming they've been vetted.
#5 Wut indeed.
#5(2) Total crime levels changing has nothing to do with a given population being a disproportionate source of crime.
#6 You're agreeing with Trump here. Literally. Context again.
Frankly, Leigh had a better point on that one.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Court Points Out Numerous Ways Using Playstation Network To Trade Child Porn Is A Bad Idea
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
On the post: Amidst Increased Government Surveillance, Chinese Internet Users Finally Gain Important Online Privacy Protections
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re:
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
Yes, that is indeed the section of the executive order which I already quoted. I'll quote from the proceeding comments which you seemingly didn't bother to read, with some extra bolding to help you out:
"Upon resumption" means that AFTER the ban ends, minority religions will get prioritised in cases in which they claim asylum from religious persecution.
There is no exemption from the ban based on religion.
There is no religious test DENYING entry.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
This is false.
My comment conflicts with what you stated by not being false.
On the post: Court Points Out Numerous Ways Using Playstation Network To Trade Child Porn Is A Bad Idea
And I'm not even sure it's an error on your part, since a quick search shows FEMA calling it the NMCEC.
On the post: Our Humanity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't this the same executive order....
"(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization."
"Upon resumption" means that AFTER the ban ends, minority religions will get prioritised in cases in which they claim asylum from religious persecution.
There is no exemption from the ban based on religion.
There is no religious test DENYING entry.
(Atheists should certainly get to claim religious persecution)
Next >>