Yes, it does happen like this, but not to the extent the FBI and repair employees are counting on. Personally, if it was not in the original work order, i would be asking the customer whether they wanted corrupt data recovery and a visual check to see how well that went. (Even for close friends for whom i can correctly assume they don't care and will respond in the affirmative.) Aside from that, would it not be an addition charge for the additional work?
You don't search visually through opened documents looking for an infection, and document corruption does not harm your system.
I have managed, for years, to manually fix what automated tools do not, and then fix the issues caused by the changes an infection caused (including "missing system files" which are neither missing, nor system files) without looking at anyone's personal shit.
I'd be happy to trawl everything on your drives for you next time you need a repair, if you like, but billing depends on how much i have to pointlessly snoop through for you.
Good the higher court was anti-pre-post prior restraint in this ridiculous attempt to keep two news organizations from having information to report which was already in the public domain. What this unknown family was thinking, i don't even
_Read that again. The argument is that, in effect, because Twitter has failed to ban similar "left-wing groups" this is discrimination._
Are there similar left wing groups? (There are some to be sure, but again they are more a minority than the white racist groups, who are also apparently right-wing by their own claims here.) Pretty sure the actual counterpart in a sensible argument is, do they kick off other hate extremists like extremists, terrorists, and their sympathizers? They sure as hell do that is they are Muslim or associated with some other "unamerican" polity.
In the mentioned Act, also one is a directly paying customer, communicating one-to-one, and the railroads and telegraph are the first way to communicate coast to coast faster than months (or weeks during the short life of the Pony Express).
I would hazard a guess that the section of the Act was mostly directed to limit monopoly powers from hamstringing competition in markets.
Re: Of course you pirates won't admit that Torrent Freak is a PRO-PIRATE site! Oh, they put on better front than Techdirt, but have distorted view of law that always favors piracy, and their weekly "Top 10 Films Pirated" is clearly to promote more.
Is Torrent Freak pro-infringement? Perhaps. And that is completely irrelevant. The word "torrent"? Also irrelevant.
We are all pirates and pro-infringement? Well OK then. I am glad you know each and every one of us better than we do ourselves, and what we say repeatedly should be ignored i suppose.
Oh, i am rather certain the reason there was an announcement with no one invited was that !0 Trump does that sort of thing and 2) no one moderated his yammering because they knew there would be a response, and they can spin that as "the industry refuses to cooperate, they hate our children". See also, encryption, etc.
They all advertise like they are even remotely cognizant, never mind supportive, of small / family farming. They are not. And there is very little private farming acreage, on the whole.
There is a huge difference, for sure, but your not-driverless car is insecure already.
Giant corporations with insecure products are certainly not fly-by-night, but they are at least partly dodgy. Whether or not you consider some of their devices to be "IoT" or not, they are insecure (possibly by design) and networked. Just, idk - Google, Cisco.
I realize that some of you are arguing against some extreme claims, but you are, at the same instance, making somewhat extreme assumptions yourselves.
Also, driverless cars are not yet in production. That rather tends to change things. Will these cars be magically better than current and historical automobiles?
On the post: FBI Documents Show More Evidence Of Agency's Sketchy Relationship With Best Buy's Geek Squad
Re: Re:
Or maybe the FBI pays some of those malware scam Indian call centers already.
On the post: FBI Documents Show More Evidence Of Agency's Sketchy Relationship With Best Buy's Geek Squad
Re:
On the post: FBI Documents Show More Evidence Of Agency's Sketchy Relationship With Best Buy's Geek Squad
Re: Re: Re: double negatives
On the post: FBI Documents Show More Evidence Of Agency's Sketchy Relationship With Best Buy's Geek Squad
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: FBI Documents Show More Evidence Of Agency's Sketchy Relationship With Best Buy's Geek Squad
Re: Re: Re:
I have managed, for years, to manually fix what automated tools do not, and then fix the issues caused by the changes an infection caused (including "missing system files" which are neither missing, nor system files) without looking at anyone's personal shit.
I'd be happy to trawl everything on your drives for you next time you need a repair, if you like, but billing depends on how much i have to pointlessly snoop through for you.
On the post: Nevada Supreme Court Overturns Lower Court's Abysmal Ruling On Las Vegas Shooting Coroner's Reports
On the post: Rhode Island Law Would Mandate Porn Filters, Charge You $20 Per Device To Bypass Them
On the post: Rhode Island Law Would Mandate Porn Filters, Charge You $20 Per Device To Bypass Them
On the post: Rhode Island Law Would Mandate Porn Filters, Charge You $20 Per Device To Bypass Them
Re: Re: If the ".XXX" domain is ever put in place, this'd be trivial "technologically", as you over-syllabalize it?
On the post: Famous Racist Sues Twitter Claiming It Violates His Civil Rights As A Racist To Be Kicked Off The Platform
Are there similar left wing groups? (There are some to be sure, but again they are more a minority than the white racist groups, who are also apparently right-wing by their own claims here.) Pretty sure the actual counterpart in a sensible argument is, do they kick off other hate extremists like extremists, terrorists, and their sympathizers? They sure as hell do that is they are Muslim or associated with some other "unamerican" polity.
On the post: Famous Racist Sues Twitter Claiming It Violates His Civil Rights As A Racist To Be Kicked Off The Platform
Re: Re: Re: Re: provocative questions...
I would hazard a guess that the section of the Act was mostly directed to limit monopoly powers from hamstringing competition in markets.
On the post: Nobody (Even His Industry BFFs) Likes Ajit Pai's Latest Attack On Low Income Broadband Programs
Re: Re: Moral bankruptcy of Pai
There ain't no such thing as a free market, and there never was. That's just just a go-to story for egoists and corporations.
On the post: Comcast Protected Browsing Blocks TorrentFreak, Showing Why Site-Blocking Sucks Out Loud Always
Re: Of course you pirates won't admit that Torrent Freak is a PRO-PIRATE site! Oh, they put on better front than Techdirt, but have distorted view of law that always favors piracy, and their weekly "Top 10 Films Pirated" is clearly to promote more.
We are all pirates and pro-infringement? Well OK then. I am glad you know each and every one of us better than we do ourselves, and what we say repeatedly should be ignored i suppose.
Have a nice day.
On the post: Trump Announces One-Sided Plan To Meet With Video Game Makers Over Gun Violence
Re: Strong words from clown mis-using: "whipping post = a post to which offenders are tied to be whipped as a legal punishment".
Going to tie him up
To the whipping post
And beat the living shit out of him 'til the guy in the audience is satisfied
On the post: Angry Pick-Up Artist Says He Won't Issue Bogus YouTube Claim On Critic's Video; Issues Bogus Claim On Critic's Video
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Mike Godwin's First Essay On Encryption And The Constitution
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Trump Announces One-Sided Plan To Meet With Video Game Makers Over Gun Violence
On the post: Wireless Carriers, Hardware Companies Use Flimsy IOT Security To Justify Attacks On Right To Repair Laws
Re:
On the post: Wireless Carriers, Hardware Companies Use Flimsy IOT Security To Justify Attacks On Right To Repair Laws
Re: Re: And yet...
Giant corporations with insecure products are certainly not fly-by-night, but they are at least partly dodgy. Whether or not you consider some of their devices to be "IoT" or not, they are insecure (possibly by design) and networked. Just, idk - Google, Cisco.
I realize that some of you are arguing against some extreme claims, but you are, at the same instance, making somewhat extreme assumptions yourselves.
Also, driverless cars are not yet in production. That rather tends to change things. Will these cars be magically better than current and historical automobiles?
On the post: Wall Street Journal Explains Why SESTA Is A Terrible Idea And Is Unnecessary
Re: Was that a rhetorical question?
They may have thought they might get cheap PR points, but that isn't really happening, and it is pretty damn clear by now. Job fail.
I guess that goes under "we made so much noise that now we have to follow through even if it is a gunshot to the foot".
Next >>