Isn't it already sexual assault? I mean, really? Add conspiracy to create and disseminate child pornography from point of the signed warrants up and we should, at the very least, have a couple more names on the sex offender registry, no?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: >>> This isn't about Trump, for fuck's sakes.
First off let me start by pointing out that if things like these are what you spend your time pondering then perhaps you might like to entertain picking up a craft-like hobby so that you can use your hands for something besides touching yourself while you're pondering these other, clearly very important things.
Once upon a time a child was born. A human child. The child was born within the walls of the asylum. Though only a newborn at the time the voice of the speaker remains both clear and loud to this day yet no image accompanies it. The voice said: "Hello child. I am here to tell you that you are all of these people here, now and although you may appear as one you are many. For we are of the sky and we are held together here in these earthly chambers. When you leave here, for surely you will, we shall all be with you and you will forever know we are here. We will meet again one day, little one, and you will know all of us and we will know you. Good luck, child and know that your mother will be protected always. Goodbye, little one."
And I have this reoccurring dream where I climb aboard a floating raft and on it is a single paddle and I approach it feeling the give and sway in the water and I grab the paddle and suddenly there are many, many hands wrapped around my own picking it up together and, every time, I look around and see nobody and immediately wake up.
So there you go - every once in a while I guess they sneak one out of me. Honestly it can be exhausting. They're so needy.
Re: Re: Re: Re: >>> This isn't about Trump, for fuck's sakes.
So... you're keeping it then? I see.
Well, if you're going to hold onto it maybe you could, you know, reread the user's guide. I think the fine print will illustrate one of only a small handful of locations where you should not store it especially when considering long-term storage.
Did you count my cunts yet? (oh, plus one.) I'd really like to know my tally.
Re: Re: Hey there, "Rapnel" -- or should I call you "SlinkySlim" or "SinkaJaw"
Yes, I am the lion, the tiger and the bear. I have stretched one beam too many. I am slim. I am slinky. For mine is the power of who gives a fuck. I would've been more impressed if you summed my usage of 'cunt'. Don't forget to add one. No, two, add two.
Bah. He's not here to learn or recognize anything. He's here to be an inconsiderate dick masquerading as someone that has a point and fails completely at everything. Dick success though, for sure.
Disagree. For one it's Twitter so apart from some rep points what is the actual, real value of fine-grained access controls that would justify their costs? Secondly, it's Twitter. It's pretty clear account handling is somewhere near the root of the actual purpose of their operations. Thirdly, any IT access to a user based operation necessarily includes tools and methods to manipulate your platform and the components within it, contractor or not. Lastly, the piece seem to have a somewhat idyllic and idealistic view of what's possible, much less reasonable, regarding procedure, process and operations in any tech with scale. As a bonus it's just IT. Any savvy player with access is ever only a few steps removed from being able to create or destroy just about anything.
Re: Re: Defense, in almost any form, is a constructive principle of security.
You're more than welcome to your dirty logic leaps however I have equal rights to gun ownership and encryption (more so the later than the former simply because math) in the interests of providing for and maintaining my own security.
To your .. point - bad people do bad things. No amount of law or state privilege will ever put a cork in that bottle, ever.
I believe that we have a natural and inherent right to self-preservation to include life, liberty, property and privacy. These are things we, as individuals, must do for ourselves as only we can truly do. I am fully aware of the myriad things that can kill me tomorrow or today. This, necessarily, includes a mad shooter, a fucker with a loaded backpack or an idiot behind the wheel. I, for one, am loath to be ruled or led around by the leash of other peoples fears and false promises.
Re: Please Don’t Try Conflating Encryption With Guns
Perhaps you could elaborate? Encryption is both defensive and offensive, as are guns. Given the very basest of comparisons I would say that both of these can be categorized as necessary tools in the interests of security, self-preservation and privacy. Dangerous freedom is the preferred state - tenuous grasps of reality are not.
A gun is also a very, very constructive tool when the use of threats, injury or death are required to compel or force a range of various outcomes. That's why police, thugs, armies and tyrants use them. Defense, in almost any form, is a constructive principle of security.
And try not to tell other people what to do in a condescending and patronizing manner when clearly you have not considered the total shape of the thing.
I think I'm actually starting to thing that "distribution rights" are a thing of the past for all but print and vinyl. You're lying to yourselves. Copyrights should not be transferable in this manner, at all. Either the creator "creates" or he doesn't. Distribution "needs" are a fallacy. The distributors have stolen copyright and now seek the fairy tales of lore and fantasy.
Life +70 does not serve anyone, with the rarest of imaginable exceptions, but distributors. Now, why is that, exactly?
On the post: Appeals Court: Forcing A Teen To Masturbate So Cops Can Take Pictures Is A Clear Violation Of Rights
Re: Turn the tables
On the post: Security Researcher Held In Jail For 8 Months Because He Wrote An Angry Blog Post, Released For Now
On the post: After Attacking Random Hollywood Supporters Of Net Neutrality, Ajit Pai Attacks Internet Companies
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: >>> This isn't about Trump, for fuck's sakes.
Once upon a time a child was born. A human child.
The child was born within the walls of the asylum.
Though only a newborn at the time the voice of the speaker remains both clear and loud to this day yet no image accompanies it.
The voice said:
"Hello child. I am here to tell you that you are all of these people here, now and although you may appear as one you are many. For we are of the sky and we are held together here in these earthly chambers. When you leave here, for surely you will, we shall all be with you and you will forever know we are here. We will meet again one day, little one, and you will know all of us and we will know you. Good luck, child and know that your mother will be protected always. Goodbye, little one."
And I have this reoccurring dream where I climb aboard a floating raft and on it is a single paddle and I approach it feeling the give and sway in the water and I grab the paddle and suddenly there are many, many hands wrapped around my own picking it up together and, every time, I look around and see nobody and immediately wake up.
So there you go - every once in a while I guess they sneak one out of me. Honestly it can be exhausting. They're so needy.
On the post: After Attacking Random Hollywood Supporters Of Net Neutrality, Ajit Pai Attacks Internet Companies
Re: Re: Re: Re: >>> This isn't about Trump, for fuck's sakes.
Well, if you're going to hold onto it maybe you could, you know, reread the user's guide. I think the fine print will illustrate one of only a small handful of locations where you should not store it especially when considering long-term storage.
Did you count my cunts yet? (oh, plus one.) I'd really like to know my tally.
On the post: House Internet Censorship Bill Is Just Like The Senate Bill, Except Worse
Re: Re: Hey there, "Rapnel" -- or should I call you "SlinkySlim" or "SinkaJaw"
On the post: After Attacking Random Hollywood Supporters Of Net Neutrality, Ajit Pai Attacks Internet Companies
Re: Re: >>> This isn't about Trump, for fuck's sakes.
On the post: After Attacking Random Hollywood Supporters Of Net Neutrality, Ajit Pai Attacks Internet Companies
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: House Internet Censorship Bill Is Just Like The Senate Bill, Except Worse
On the post: Russia Threatens To Go To War With Google Over Stupid Comments By Eric Schmidt
Kind of like what the Internet is about to become. Gate-keeper bloat gone wild.
I wish to erase the face of the corporate Internet. So very much.
Fuck Google. I hope Russia wins.
On the post: Don't Cheer For The Twitter Employee Who Deleted Donald Trump's Account
And so I will cheer.
On the post: Canadian Court Says Law Enforcement Doesn't Have To Hand Over Info On Stingray Devices
Re: Re: What are they hiding?
On the post: Reporter Arrested, Thrown To The Ground For Cursing
Re:
On the post: Three Energy Bills Look To Increase Fourth Amendment Protections For Americans
The vacuum of ominous effervescence distorts my realm.
The lunar sculptures ride eternity on their phantom ponies.
Hides and stock, consequences of forgetful delights and nourished envy for mine what is mine.
Mine is the glory of the stupefied, the bewildered among thieves and the ravenous, captured parrots.
Hang-glide the crescendo of harmonious acrimony to be forever nourished by the coupling of blight and plague.
Dancing without feet.
Singing without a face.
Biting without teeth.
Leaving no trace.
On the post: UK Home Secretary Calls Tech Leaders 'Patronizing' For Refusing To Believe Her 'Safe Backdoors' Spiels
Re: Re: Defense, in almost any form, is a constructive principle of security.
To your .. point - bad people do bad things. No amount of law or state privilege will ever put a cork in that bottle, ever.
I believe that we have a natural and inherent right to self-preservation to include life, liberty, property and privacy. These are things we, as individuals, must do for ourselves as only we can truly do. I am fully aware of the myriad things that can kill me tomorrow or today. This, necessarily, includes a mad shooter, a fucker with a loaded backpack or an idiot behind the wheel. I, for one, am loath to be ruled or led around by the leash of other peoples fears and false promises.
On the post: UK Home Secretary Calls Tech Leaders 'Patronizing' For Refusing To Believe Her 'Safe Backdoors' Spiels
Re: Please Don’t Try Conflating Encryption With Guns
A gun is also a very, very constructive tool when the use of threats, injury or death are required to compel or force a range of various outcomes. That's why police, thugs, armies and tyrants use them. Defense, in almost any form, is a constructive principle of security.
And try not to tell other people what to do in a condescending and patronizing manner when clearly you have not considered the total shape of the thing.
On the post: UK Home Secretary Calls Tech Leaders 'Patronizing' For Refusing To Believe Her 'Safe Backdoors' Spiels
Re: Re: Re: Re: crypto fans are being disingenuous
On the post: Elsevier Continues To Build Its Monopoly Solution For All Aspects Of Scholarly Communication
Re:
On the post: Film Director's Op-Ed Ignores Reality To Push Hollywood Lobbying Talking Points
Life +70 does not serve anyone, with the rarest of imaginable exceptions, but distributors. Now, why is that, exactly?
On the post: Massachusetts State Police Take $180 From Records Requester; Refuse To Turn Over Records
On the post: ACLU To Court: It's Legal To Tell Bob To Eat Shit
Re: The Masnick has entirely forgotten the coal miners and now openly delights in court details and meaningless insults.
Can old coal miners not screw in new solar panels? I had no idea.
Next >>