Biden on 15 July issued FACEBOOK executives a specific list of Facebook accounts he wanted banned for spreading “misinformation” about the Covid vaccine.
You mean this?
'The White House has repeatedly flagged “problematic posts” that contain disinformation and pushed Facebook for more transparency in its data on who this COVID-19 disinformation is reaching, Psaki said on July 15.'
That the American progressive left want’s to call it something different doesn’t change what it is teaching.
Correct, and what they are teaching is not critical race theory. That isn't because they are teaching CRT without calling it that, it's because they are teaching something that isn't CRT.
Just as I expected. None of that is teaching critical race theory. Anti-racism is not CRT. Diversity programs are not CRT. Policies founded on some of the same principles that CRT teaches do not amount to teaching CRT to children. Feel free to try again, if you like. Or you might want to go back and read the article that you linked that does a pretty good job explaining what CRT is. Either you didn't read it, or it went over your head, if you think any of this stuff you just linked is evidence of teaching CRT to kids.
What I want is a school district web site where they specify that they are going to be teaching CRT in middle schools. If it's really happening, that should be possible to find. Curriculum tends to be a matter of public record. So go to your secondary sources that are claiming this, and see what their primary sources are, if any. Either you will find the source, or discover that you have been lied to. Not that you would ever admit that.
Then why is CRT curriculum being rolled out across the country.
It isn't.
It’s being, or introduced to be, included as early as middle school.
Citation, please. And not from Fox News or the like complaining about CRT, I want to see an actual school curriculum plan that includes it. And none of this vague terms that conservatives are pretending are the same thing as CRT but aren't. It has to be specifically critical race theory.
CRT, as it is being pushed at the current moment, is a right wing fantasy. The actual CRT is not being "pushed" at all, it's being taught in some law schools and graduate sociology programs and that's it. That's how it has been for years and years, and nobody had a problem with it until just recently.
when they are supplied evidence they throw it out the window because it’s not part of their media bubble.
That is the right wing you're talking about. There's misinformation on the left too, but it runs into facts and dissipates, which doesn't happen on the right. There is no left wing media bubble, at least not nearly to the extent there is on the right.
If the marijuana didn't make it to the lab, where is it? Why is it not available to be presented to the court? Did the officer just take it home and smoke it?
White House spokeschick: “Uhh, ahem, yeah, we’re telling Big Tech who to censor for their right-wing political opinions.”
So you're acknowledging spreading misinformation about medical issues as a right-wing political opinion? Because that's what the White House was reporting to Facebook.
On the post: Judge Ignores First Amendment, Misreads Town Law, While Ordering Resident To Remove 'Fuck Biden' Signs
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yeah Fox News is well known for letting bygones be bygones when it comes to Democrats.
On the post: Judge Ignores First Amendment, Misreads Town Law, While Ordering Resident To Remove 'Fuck Biden' Signs
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
When was the last time you saw a bar with a stable?
On the post: Judge Ignores First Amendment, Misreads Town Law, While Ordering Resident To Remove 'Fuck Biden' Signs
Re: Re:
It's a reference to this phenomenon:
https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/why-do-people-hate-the-word-moist
On the post: Senator Amy Klobuchar Says She Has A Bill To Hold Facebook Responsible For Vaccine Disinfo; But What Would The Cause Of Action Be?
Re: Re: For Harmful Speech
The problem is what the rest of us will get too: more virus mutations, some of which might not be handled by the vaccines we have.
On the post: Senator Amy Klobuchar Says She Has A Bill To Hold Facebook Responsible For Vaccine Disinfo; But What Would The Cause Of Action Be?
Re: Re: actual planned censorship
You mean this?
'The White House has repeatedly flagged “problematic posts” that contain disinformation and pushed Facebook for more transparency in its data on who this COVID-19 disinformation is reaching, Psaki said on July 15.'
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Correct, and what they are teaching is not critical race theory. That isn't because they are teaching CRT without calling it that, it's because they are teaching something that isn't CRT.
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No, just not letting you get away with redefining terms.
So now you're arguing about something that actually exists! Big improvement.
On the post: Florida
ManGovernor Wastes More Florida Taxpayer Money Appealing Ruling About His Unconstitutional Social Media LawRe: Re: Re: I Invented the Keyboard Necktie!!!!
How does one describe this level of oblivious irony?
On the post: Judge Ignores First Amendment, Misreads Town Law, While Ordering Resident To Remove 'Fuck Biden' Signs
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If it's partly political, then it cannot be purely prurient. That's what "purely" means.
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Just as I expected. None of that is teaching critical race theory. Anti-racism is not CRT. Diversity programs are not CRT. Policies founded on some of the same principles that CRT teaches do not amount to teaching CRT to children. Feel free to try again, if you like. Or you might want to go back and read the article that you linked that does a pretty good job explaining what CRT is. Either you didn't read it, or it went over your head, if you think any of this stuff you just linked is evidence of teaching CRT to kids.
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, you
What I want is a school district web site where they specify that they are going to be teaching CRT in middle schools. If it's really happening, that should be possible to find. Curriculum tends to be a matter of public record. So go to your secondary sources that are claiming this, and see what their primary sources are, if any. Either you will find the source, or discover that you have been lied to. Not that you would ever admit that.
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, you know...
So as I expected, no information about middle schools teaching CRT. Because that isn't happening.
Convenient! What were we talking about earlier? Oh yeah, rejecting anything that doesn't conform to the information in your thought bubble.
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, you know...
It isn't.
Citation, please. And not from Fox News or the like complaining about CRT, I want to see an actual school curriculum plan that includes it. And none of this vague terms that conservatives are pretending are the same thing as CRT but aren't. It has to be specifically critical race theory.
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, you know...
You would like that, wouldn't you?
CRT, as it is being pushed at the current moment, is a right wing fantasy. The actual CRT is not being "pushed" at all, it's being taught in some law schools and graduate sociology programs and that's it. That's how it has been for years and years, and nobody had a problem with it until just recently.
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, you know...
That is the right wing you're talking about. There's misinformation on the left too, but it runs into facts and dissipates, which doesn't happen on the right. There is no left wing media bubble, at least not nearly to the extent there is on the right.
It's history actually.
It was never a weapon.
On the post: Court To Cop: You Need More Than 'Odor Of Marijuana' And Inconsistent Testimony To Justify A Warrantless Search
Evidence
If the marijuana didn't make it to the lab, where is it? Why is it not available to be presented to the court? Did the officer just take it home and smoke it?
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does anyone get this silly notion...
Nope. That isn't using government power to suppress speech, because Facebook is free to do whatever they want with the reports, including nothing.
On the post: Judge Ignores First Amendment, Misreads Town Law, While Ordering Resident To Remove 'Fuck Biden' Signs
Re: Re: Re:
What could you possibly be convicted of for yelling fire in a building that is actually on fire?
On the post: Senator Steve Daines Decides To Spit On The 1st Amendment Again: Wants To Ban Moderation Of Politicians
Re: Re: but what if…
So you're acknowledging spreading misinformation about medical issues as a right-wing political opinion? Because that's what the White House was reporting to Facebook.
On the post: House Republican's Entire 'Big Tech' Platform Is 'We Must Force Big Tech To Display Our Conspiracy Theories And Lies'
Re: Re: Well…
Voted funny.
Next >>