The impact rating obtainable by publishing in one of the "better" journals is slipping away anyway. Eventually they will change or die, or someone will come up with laws demanding that papers must be relinquished to the old journals.
As if there are identifying marks on every little application of velcro. What happens if it is actually Velcro and i don't call it such? Beyond that, why didn't they spend the time since RTM identifying it as Velcro brand hook and loop fastener product? They did it to themselves.
This would also all the trolls who purposely bought an address there in the past. I would not be surprised if Gilstrap and friends complain of tortious interference with a business model.
I don't believe i have ever seen the merits of the defamation claims. The only case that was pursued ended in default.
More generally, I would also be curious to know how much effect bullshit negative reviews actually have. And what is the efficacy of having them delisted? It always seems to me that is is just a way for control freaks and people who are easily (even if rightfully) upset to waste money.
I have noticed how they render their own hardware self-incompatible as well, and much more recently. So this HP printer won't even work with this HP computer anymore, though they went to market at roughly the same time? Yep.
Oh my. There is a world of research and articles about printers sending rather interesting info out across the net, and exposing any network to which they are attached, among other things.
They wouldn't need security updates if they didn't do stupid shit in the first place, no. But they were at the vanguard of the tire fire now known as the IoT.
I thought the definition given in the leaked document was pretty clear with the quote and expanded commentary.
This is like suggesting the linked video is technically ignorant by saying the title implies only USB-connected devices or all devices with USB connectors can be used for a dead drop.
On the post: Scientific Publishers Want Upload Filter To Stop Academics Sharing Their Own Papers Without Permission
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Scientific Publishers Want Upload Filter To Stop Academics Sharing Their Own Papers Without Permission
Re:
On the post: Scientific Publishers Want Upload Filter To Stop Academics Sharing Their Own Papers Without Permission
Re: Re:
On the post: Scientific Publishers Want Upload Filter To Stop Academics Sharing Their Own Papers Without Permission
Re: A cure
On the post: UK Man Gets 12-Month Sentence For Refusing To Turn Over Passwords To Police
On the post: Velcro's Hilarious Trademark Lesson Video Actually A Good Lesson In Just How Stupid Trademark Law Has Become
How will one know when to call it Velcro?
On the post: Appeals Court Tells Patent Trolls' Favorite Judge He Can't Just Ignore The Supreme Court To Keep Patent Cases In Texas
Re: Isn't it ironic...
On the post: Desperate To Stop Leaks, The Trump Administration Considers Moving From Bad Ideas To Worse Ones
leakstravaganza
Or leakapalooza.
Even so, it's a desperation move that shows the White House can't contain the leaks, much less hope to stop them.
It may be easier to find the bits that are not leaking. Like a couple of rocks poking through the surface of a river.
On the post: British News Channel Touts Amazon Bomb Materials Moral Panic That Ends Up Being About Hobbyists And School Labs
Next thing you know, people will find out where to buy oxygen and acetylene, or alarm clocks and mobile phones.
On the post: Company CEO Pleads Guilty After Forging Judge's Signatures On Bogus Court Orders Sent To Google
Re: Re:
On the post: Company CEO Pleads Guilty After Forging Judge's Signatures On Bogus Court Orders Sent To Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: September 17th - 23rd
Re: Harvard retro
Christian? That is hardly the actual defining factor.
On the post: 'Smart' Hospital IV Pump Vulnerable To Remote Hack Attack
Re:
On the post: Company CEO Pleads Guilty After Forging Judge's Signatures On Bogus Court Orders Sent To Google
More generally, I would also be curious to know how much effect bullshit negative reviews actually have. And what is the efficacy of having them delisted? It always seems to me that is is just a way for control freaks and people who are easily (even if rightfully) upset to waste money.
On the post: CCleaner Hack May Have Been A State-Sponsored Attack On 18 Major Tech Companies
On the post: HP Brings Back Obnoxious DRM That Cripples Competing Printer Cartridges
Re:
On the post: HP Brings Back Obnoxious DRM That Cripples Competing Printer Cartridges
Re:
They wouldn't need security updates if they didn't do stupid shit in the first place, no. But they were at the vanguard of the tire fire now known as the IoT.
On the post: Verizon Hangs Up On Tens Of Thousands Of 'Unlimited' Wireless Customers For Using Too Much Data
Re:
On the post: Released Snowden Doc Shows NSA Thwarting Electronic Dead Drops By Using Email Metadata
Re: Technically ignorant?
This is like suggesting the linked video is technically ignorant by saying the title implies only USB-connected devices or all devices with USB connectors can be used for a dead drop.
On the post: Insanity: Theresa May Says Internet Companies Need To Remove 'Extremist' Content Within 2 Hours
Re: Starting with her (crazy, extremist rantings)
Next >>