9 of 10.
Thoughtful, well written, addresses the topic at hand.
In short, best trolling I've seen all day.
You need a little ad hominem and a couple buzzwords to get 10 of 10, but over all, excellent, just excellent.
Response: Yeah! Totallly! It's not like anybody on the planet would be willing to kick in a few bucks to make a product they'd like to see a reality! Who wouldn't want to also get something more out of it?
Also, there's nothing like "if you spend this much money, you'll get 'x'"!! That sort of thing is why gambling, oop, I mean investing in the stock exchange is a far safer bet--no 'real object' will ever be created there, and there is a guaranteed motion to your investment; namely from you to your stock broker and *poof* gone.
And if you account for ripple extended internet effects, our twitter following is about 3x the population of Earth! Clear evidence that extraterrestrial intelligence is on our side, as we are right.
Ha! Laws are some the most brittle yet supple things ever made. They can be twisted and contorted in amazing ways without breaking--and other times they're broken by nothing more than a cross word.
Here's the only thing anybody needs to know about the legal system: S/He who has the most expensive lawyer wins.
Ergo, you can buy justice, but only if you can afford to pay more than the other person.
Also: Your court appointed attorney doesn't actually represent your interests.
No, he'll claim Twitter is a fully controlled puppet of Google, and they're just trying to assert the false-image of non-evilness to brainwash everybody into thinking 'Big Search' is nothing to fear!
That's cute boB, but the "Market" portion of your little 'market reality' diatribe is entirely unnecessary.
Reality dictates; unless you're able to defend yourself; it's entirely possible you'll be at the 'whimsy' of a person holding a gun regardless of your physical geolocation. And, that person might be a criminal!
Also, Police Have No Duty To Protect Individuals--but don't take my word for it, check the case law for yourself.
On the other hand, at least it's not some drivel like "you crazy and stupid Mike, shutup!" (or some such garbage).
I appreciate a shill who can take the time to have some pride in well crafted shifty arguments--and even moreso those who can convince you they do indeed believe such outright ludicrous notions.
Now then, let's give the man some dephlogisticated air and let him spew forth his message across the aether!
On the post: Verizon Sued For Promising Faster Broadband Than It Could Deliver
Re: Re: Re: ^.'
On the post: Verizon Sued For Promising Faster Broadband Than It Could Deliver
Re: ^.'
On the post: Kickstarter Keeps Funding Bigger And Bigger Projects
Re: Paywall ++
Thoughtful, well written, addresses the topic at hand.
In short, best trolling I've seen all day.
You need a little ad hominem and a couple buzzwords to get 10 of 10, but over all, excellent, just excellent.
Response: Yeah! Totallly! It's not like anybody on the planet would be willing to kick in a few bucks to make a product they'd like to see a reality! Who wouldn't want to also get something more out of it?
Also, there's nothing like "if you spend this much money, you'll get 'x'"!! That sort of thing is why gambling, oop, I mean investing in the stock exchange is a far safer bet--no 'real object' will ever be created there, and there is a guaranteed motion to your investment; namely from you to your stock broker and *poof* gone.
/troll-shill (trill?)
On the post: Chinese Copyright Proposal Would Allow Compulsory Licensing Of Music After Three Months
Re:
On the post: Chinese Copyright Proposal Would Allow Compulsory Licensing Of Music After Three Months
Re: Re: Communist
On the post: Cargo Cult Reverse Activism: Maximalists Think That If They Use Social Media They Can Counteract Public Concerns
Re: Re: In your face, Mike...
/shill
On the post: Did The Publisher's Own Insistence On DRM Inevitably Lead To The Antitrust Lawsuit Against Them?
Re:-D
On the post: Did The Publisher's Own Insistence On DRM Inevitably Lead To The Antitrust Lawsuit Against Them?
Humans!
Also, believing propaganda is far easier than thinking for oneself or discovering the truth thru research and reason.
Seriously, this is a pattern which is easily found across many industries, and even answers questions like "why do people still use Windows?"
On the post: Microsoft: Open Standards Are Good... If They're The Open Standards We Get Paid For
Re: Re: FRAND-lexic?
On the post: Microsoft: Open Standards Are Good... If They're The Open Standards We Get Paid For
FRAND-lexic?
I know I sure did...
On the post: Court Says Dutch Anti-Piracy Organization Overreached; Won't Shut Down Pirate Party Proxy Site
Re: Faith
Ha! Laws are some the most brittle yet supple things ever made. They can be twisted and contorted in amazing ways without breaking--and other times they're broken by nothing more than a cross word.
Here's the only thing anybody needs to know about the legal system: S/He who has the most expensive lawyer wins.
Ergo, you can buy justice, but only if you can afford to pay more than the other person.
Also: Your court appointed attorney doesn't actually represent your interests.
On the post: CISPA Sponsor Mike Rogers Says Protests Are Mere 'Turbulence' On Landing
Re: The truth
On the post: CISPA Sponsor Mike Rogers Says Protests Are Mere 'Turbulence' On Landing
Re: M.W.S. Reply
Second, not bad, not bad at all.
you forgot your '/troll' tag though.
On the post: Twitter's Revolutionary Agreement Lets Original Inventors Stop Patent Trolls
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Also, it's easy to miss the child porn if you're not looking for it.)
On the post: Twitter's Revolutionary Agreement Lets Original Inventors Stop Patent Trolls
Re: Re:
Won't anybody copyright the children?!
On the post: Twitter's Revolutionary Agreement Lets Original Inventors Stop Patent Trolls
Re: Puppeto!
/am-i-doing-it-right?
On the post: Is The Supreme Court Just Completely Out Of Touch On Digital Copyright Issues?
Re: Market realities?
Reality dictates; unless you're able to defend yourself; it's entirely possible you'll be at the 'whimsy' of a person holding a gun regardless of your physical geolocation. And, that person might be a criminal!
Also, Police Have No Duty To Protect Individuals--but don't take my word for it, check the case law for yourself.
On the post: Revolving Door Between The MPAA And The Federal Government
Re: ___
On the post: Copyright Maximalists Try To Regroup And Figure Out How To 'Fight Back' Against The Public
Re: Re: Legitimate complaints?
I appreciate a shill who can take the time to have some pride in well crafted shifty arguments--and even moreso those who can convince you they do indeed believe such outright ludicrous notions.
Now then, let's give the man some dephlogisticated air and let him spew forth his message across the aether!
On the post: Copyright Maximalists Try To Regroup And Figure Out How To 'Fight Back' Against The Public
Re: I have an idea that will fix everything
You have my axe.
Next >>