If it was one of those that should not have been sent out, it would include an offer to squash Mr. Steele, not a subpoena. Who wouldn't accept such an offer?
I hope for a similar outcome in my case (IO Group, Inc v. Does 1-244). I chose to fight anonymously with a Californian troll, Gill Sperlein. I'm the only one from this case fighting. 5 people caved in and paid settlements even prior to discovery.
I'm not a lawyer, which clearly manifests itself, but it gives me some freedom in choosing the words. Mr. Sperlein is clearly pissed, and that gives me some comfort regardless of the future case outcome.
On the post: Judge Slams Copyright Troll Lawyer John Steele's Latest 'Fishing Expedition'
Re:
On the post: Judge Slams Copyright Troll Lawyer John Steele's Latest 'Fishing Expedition'
IO Group, Inc v. Does 1-244
I'm not a lawyer, which clearly manifests itself, but it gives me some freedom in choosing the words. Mr. Sperlein is clearly pissed, and that gives me some comfort regardless of the future case outcome.
http://www.scribd.com/collections/2997952/Case3-10-cv-03647-Dockets
If you don't have time to read everything, Docket #25 is where I call troll by its real ugly name.
Today I'm sending another motion, as harsh as #25, and I will upload it as soon as it is filed.
Next >>