First off - you don't know what "Literal" means. Google it.
Second - your key capslock is broken. You should get that looked at.
Third - Copyright is a right granted to corporations by the federal government. You hate the feds, and hate corporate rights - so your complaints are hilarious.
Well except for the massive first amendment issues, the complete lack of consumer confusion, and the fact that this is nothing but back-room dealing to protect government bribes, I guess.
But I guess you really are confused by the term "Veggie Burger" then it's proof that generations of inbreeding really does take a toll.
but mainstream media pushing the crazy leftist views
So you hold an opinion that the sane folks all shun, but Inforwars is your oracle of truth. Because they uncovered Pizza Gate!
Main-Stream. Look at the words you are typing. You are saying that everyone is wrong except for those geniuses who told us Sandyhook shooting (and the moon landing!) was fake.
Either they gave her a pimple, or they erased one.
Yes, they kicked in a video filter to soften the image. Most all digital processing does this to some extent. Obviously someone kicked it up a notch at one point. This is exceptionally common with HD images. Your tinfoil, screwed on too tight.
Re: If impossible, cut them down to size. No right to exist at a
(during good behavior by common law terms)
Couldn't pass that one up - What law are they violating again? Please cite!
And to be clear - are you saying:
"Google is breaking the law"
or
"Corporations - ANY corporations - should be banned under the premise of Cabbage Law."
So under the current copyfraud scheme, you could replace the frame on an ancient painting and claim it is a new work with a new copyright. Taking pictures would be illegal. Brilliant!
I'm not sure, I was laughing too hard that someone was quoting Tim Pool.
But One thing I know for sure - that they will never ever address - Balls and Snape would never in a million years run their website to the standards they want Twitter to adhere to. "All leal speech or no speech."
Well, I guess "No Speech." They can live by that. Balls can't lift a finger to do his own marvelous blog.
Are you really advocating we go back to "Whites Only" signs? Your statement that the constitution only applies to government and not businesses would make those signs legal again.
John, that is the single stupidest thing I've heard all day. The "Gay Cake" rulings from the right could do that. The only parts of the constitution you, myself, or Youtube has to follow are the parts enshrined in law.
"Make no laws" for speech means the Feds don't get to say what we can or can not print/blog/type.
Indeed. I have seen factory disks used as coasters that will read somehow. But Some that were cheap and died an early death.
Bitrot is kinda a real thing, amused that the previous AC think's is somehow false. Guess he has a simple fix he'll sell us along with his mailing list.
Well as a Newspaper they seem to understand that even if they solicit submissions, the government can't force them to accept articles written by the Proud Boys or Illinois Nazi Party if they don't want.
Unlike some commenters that would be perfectly happy forcing speech on FB and Twitter because "We don't like those companies."
How do you feel when copyright is used by corporations to censor speech without a court order?
What Mr. Balls is in denial about is that this isn't a "Shrinkwrap" issue with nasty corporations imposing draconian use limitations.
This is Copoyright law making it a criminal offense to decrypt, shift, or backukp your purchased eBooks.
And as the article states you don't get your books. Free, or paid, they go away - poof. Your annotations - poof. Taking what you paid for is actually theft. These files are going away. (But if it's ok to steal if you hand over some money it's ok I guess?)
You are lucky the disk reads at all - I have seem plenty of people with boxes of pictures on various disks, and bitrot had all but destroyed their collection.
On the post: Prenda's John Steele Gets 5 Years In Prison; Insists He's Really, Really, Really Sorry
Re: Funny world: Trolls perish
LITERAL BY-THE-NECK-UNTIL-DEAD HANGING
First off - you don't know what "Literal" means. Google it.
Second - your key capslock is broken. You should get that looked at.
Third - Copyright is a right granted to corporations by the federal government. You hate the feds, and hate corporate rights - so your complaints are hilarious.
On the post: Vegan Food Manufacturers Sue State Over Unconstitutional Law Banning Them From Using Meat Words
Re: Re: Bet the State Wins this round
Yeah, the vegan companies have a weak case.
Well except for the massive first amendment issues, the complete lack of consumer confusion, and the fact that this is nothing but back-room dealing to protect government bribes, I guess.
But I guess you really are confused by the term "Veggie Burger" then it's proof that generations of inbreeding really does take a toll.
On the post: Indie Publishers Tell Gamers To Pirate Instead Of Buying Keys Through Reseller G2A
Re: Re: Re:
The stolen credit card thing is a total red herring. You can't stay in business selling game keys that don't work.
No, the stolen credit card thing is a really big deal. G2A has a massive fraud problem they need to address
https://www.polygon.com/2019/7/5/20683026/g2a-controversy-audit-petition
On the post: Big Fair Use Win Concerning Andy Warhol's Paintings Of Prince
Re: Re:
Imaginary property is still legal property according to the law
Imaginary property can only be protected by imaginary laws!
Blue Balls holds the position the corporations can't hold property - therefore they can't hold copyrights.
On the post: Once Again, Russian Internet Propaganda Efforts Shown To Be Much Bigger Than Originally Believed
Re: Re: In summary:
but mainstream media pushing the crazy leftist views
So you hold an opinion that the sane folks all shun, but Inforwars is your oracle of truth. Because they uncovered Pizza Gate!
Main-Stream. Look at the words you are typing. You are saying that everyone is wrong except for those geniuses who told us Sandyhook shooting (and the moon landing!) was fake.
On the post: 'Deep Fake' Legislation Is On The Way, Threatening Free Speech Protections
Re:
Either they gave her a pimple, or they erased one.
Yes, they kicked in a video filter to soften the image. Most all digital processing does this to some extent. Obviously someone kicked it up a notch at one point. This is exceptionally common with HD images. Your tinfoil, screwed on too tight.
On the post: Big Fair Use Win Concerning Andy Warhol's Paintings Of Prince
Re:
Copyright is a "right" granted to corporations that lets them censor speech.
It goes against the will of the masses, and therefore has no legitimacy. Obviously.
On the post: Content Moderation At Scale Is Impossible: The Case Of YouTube And 'Hacking' Videos
Re: If impossible, cut them down to size. No right to exist at a
(during good behavior by common law terms)
Couldn't pass that one up - What law are they violating again? Please cite!
And to be clear - are you saying:
"Google is breaking the law"
or
"Corporations - ANY corporations - should be banned under the premise of Cabbage Law."
Go on - I really want to hear this one!
On the post: We Should Probably Stop Blaming Technology For The Failings Of Human Beings
Re: Society, open or closed?
One key to an open society is open, transparent government. That would be a big improvement.
On the post: Yes, The EU Copyright Directive Does Have A Few Good Ideas -- But They Need To Be Implemented Properly
Re: Re: Re: Hprinter Official
It's good the filters let a few slip on occasion so we are reminded what it would be like without moderation.
On the post: Yes, The EU Copyright Directive Does Have A Few Good Ideas -- But They Need To Be Implemented Properly
Original Art
So under the current copyfraud scheme, you could replace the frame on an ancient painting and claim it is a new work with a new copyright. Taking pictures would be illegal. Brilliant!
On the post: WSJ Op Ed Warns: Killing Section 230, Kills The Internet
Re: Re: Sure, it's trolls all the way down
Where did Mike say the WSJ was anti-corporate?
I'm not sure, I was laughing too hard that someone was quoting Tim Pool.
But One thing I know for sure - that they will never ever address - Balls and Snape would never in a million years run their website to the standards they want Twitter to adhere to. "All leal speech or no speech."
Well, I guess "No Speech." They can live by that. Balls can't lift a finger to do his own marvelous blog.
On the post: WSJ Op Ed Warns: Killing Section 230, Kills The Internet
Re: Re: Re:
Are you really advocating we go back to "Whites Only" signs? Your statement that the constitution only applies to government and not businesses would make those signs legal again.
John, that is the single stupidest thing I've heard all day. The "Gay Cake" rulings from the right could do that. The only parts of the constitution you, myself, or Youtube has to follow are the parts enshrined in law.
"Make no laws" for speech means the Feds don't get to say what we can or can not print/blog/type.
Show me a law that says I must host Nazi's.
On the post: You Don't Own What You've Bought: Microsoft's Books 'Will Stop Working'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing New Here
Indeed. I have seen factory disks used as coasters that will read somehow. But Some that were cheap and died an early death.
Bitrot is kinda a real thing, amused that the previous AC think's is somehow false. Guess he has a simple fix he'll sell us along with his mailing list.
On the post: Schools Are Using 'Aggression Detecting' Mics That Are Set Off By Coughing, Slamming Locker Doors To Head Off The Next School Shooting
Re:
You have adware on your PC. Run some cleaners or seek professional help ASAP.
On the post: WSJ Op Ed Warns: Killing Section 230, Kills The Internet
Viewpoint Neutrality
Well as a Newspaper they seem to understand that even if they solicit submissions, the government can't force them to accept articles written by the Proud Boys or Illinois Nazi Party if they don't want.
Unlike some commenters that would be perfectly happy forcing speech on FB and Twitter because "We don't like those companies."
On the post: You Don't Own What You've Bought: Microsoft's Books 'Will Stop Working'
Re:
How do you feel when copyright is used by corporations to censor speech without a court order?
What Mr. Balls is in denial about is that this isn't a "Shrinkwrap" issue with nasty corporations imposing draconian use limitations.
This is Copoyright law making it a criminal offense to decrypt, shift, or backukp your purchased eBooks.
And as the article states you don't get your books. Free, or paid, they go away - poof. Your annotations - poof. Taking what you paid for is actually theft. These files are going away. (But if it's ok to steal if you hand over some money it's ok I guess?)
On the post: You Don't Own What You've Bought: Microsoft's Books 'Will Stop Working'
Re: Nothing New Here
You are lucky the disk reads at all - I have seem plenty of people with boxes of pictures on various disks, and bitrot had all but destroyed their collection.
On the post: Schools Are Using 'Aggression Detecting' Mics That Are Set Off By Coughing, Slamming Locker Doors To Head Off The Next School Shooting
Familiar
This is a pretty familiar scam repackaged:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-29459896
Hopefully the people selling this will be jailed too.
On the post: Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo Say Trump Tariffs Will Make Game Consoles Hugely More Expensive
Re: Re:
But being screwed over by China for YEARS and us just taking it, doesn't seem right.
Kinda making shit up there eh? Very Stable Orange Genius...
Next >>