You make a lot of assumptions for someone who doesn't know me, at all.
You are an AC. You were born five minutes ago and will go away forever soon.
I can assume whatever the hell I want about your nameless, faceless, and racist comments.
There is no such thing as 'hate speech,' by the way. There's only 'free speech' and 'direct incitements to violence.' Any other speech you think exists is a delusion.
Well the hate speech of the day is The_Donald getting dickslapped for threatening cops so have fun with that.
El Cheetos "The Donald" slammed with sanctions on Reddit. Because it's filled with toxic assholes. Who are already crying about censorship and melting like the snowflakes they are.
If you read the article Trump was complaining about his Twitter numbers but hey. Twitter, Google, all the same thing. Especially if you rely on Veritas and InfoWars for your news about the latest Pizzagate.
It seems to be a specific reference to the recent story where he met with Jack Dorsey and complained that his number of followers had declined following a bot purge.
Hey he paid Putin good money to get those Russian bots to follow him and had every reason to be upset.
Can you imagine what Star Wars fandom would have been like if there were no magazines like Starlog? The only place you could talk about the movie would have the official Lucas magazine.
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re: Re: Re:
If you don't want to deal with someone you don't like, the government shouldn't be forcing you to.
We get it - serving blacks, jews and irish goes against the teaching of the nazi party.
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re: Re: Re:
You make a lot of assumptions for someone who doesn't know me, at all.
You are an AC. You were born five minutes ago and will go away forever soon.
I can assume whatever the hell I want about your nameless, faceless, and racist comments.
There is no such thing as 'hate speech,' by the way. There's only 'free speech' and 'direct incitements to violence.' Any other speech you think exists is a delusion.
Well the hate speech of the day is The_Donald getting dickslapped for threatening cops so have fun with that.
Companies have and must have TOS and moderation.
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re:
You run a business and don't want to use your time and effort to serve blacks
There, I fixed it for you!
Not that you understand the difference between open accommodations and hosting hate speech, you racist POS.
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re:
Fake President
HEY don't disrespect the White House or El Cheetos will get upset. (Picking on Obama didn't count, because he wasn't born in the states, am I right?)
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re: Re: he paid good money to Putin for those bots...
Rubles? No he paid in gift certificates good for smoozing at Ma Largo and Trump Towers.
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re: Re: Re: out_of_the_blue
El Cheetos "The Donald" slammed with sanctions on Reddit. Because it's filled with toxic assholes. Who are already crying about censorship and melting like the snowflakes they are.
But it's "Proof of bias." LOL.
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re: out_of_the_blue
If you read the article Trump was complaining about his Twitter numbers but hey. Twitter, Google, all the same thing. Especially if you rely on Veritas and InfoWars for your news about the latest Pizzagate.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/21/donald-trump-lies-factcheckers
On the post: Trump Thinks That The Government Can And Should Sue Internet Companies Because He Doesn't Like The People Who Work There
Re:
It seems to be a specific reference to the recent story where he met with Jack Dorsey and complained that his number of followers had declined following a bot purge.
Hey he paid Putin good money to get those Russian bots to follow him and had every reason to be upset.
On the post: Supreme Court To Review Whether Or Not You Can Copyright State Laws
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So court decisions have artistic merit, but aren't facts. And citing these cases isn't important to other cases. Right.
On the post: Supreme Court To Review Whether Or Not You Can Copyright State Laws
Re:
"But," John Smith clicked his tongue, "Who would ever follow the laws unless they were copyrighted?"
I think you mean, "Who would make new laws if they weren't copy-protected."
On the post: Supreme Court To Review Whether Or Not You Can Copyright State Laws
Re: Re:
Annotations and summaries are not just abstract musings. They are relied upon by other court cases and make new law.
On the post: Major League Baseball's Obsession With Cashing In On Everything Has Harmed The Game's Popularity Online
Re: Cry all you want
And you wanna cry because MLB wants a piece of your action? Lame. You don’t get both ways.
You should be crying because you didn't read the article.
On the post: Supreme Court To Review Whether Or Not You Can Copyright State Laws
Re: Coup
Or we are on the verge of opening our closed caselaw to the public.
On the post: Supreme Court To Review Whether Or Not You Can Copyright State Laws
Re:
An annotation is just sections of court written case law which apply to the statute. How are court opinions copyrightable?
Those are what makes up American Common Law. Caselaw is a very important part of the laws you must follow.
On the post: Supreme Court To Review Whether Or Not You Can Copyright State Laws
Ownership
Well this will settle the question - Can corporations own, and hide the law?
On the post: Major League Baseball's Obsession With Cashing In On Everything Has Harmed The Game's Popularity Online
Fandom
Can you imagine what Star Wars fandom would have been like if there were no magazines like Starlog? The only place you could talk about the movie would have the official Lucas magazine.
On the post: Universal Music Cashed In On Insurance After It Let Thousands Of Master Recordings Burn... And Didn't Give Any To Artists
Right
Oh hey, they were never fighting for the Artists. Just the Rightsholders, eh?
On the post: Supreme Court Now Says That The Trademark Office Can't Reject 'Immoral Or Scandalous' Trademarks
Re: Re: Re: Fires Up Crude Copywrong
Yes, Copyright is the right of Corporations to halt speech.
On the post: Self-Made Millionaire Loses Lawsuit Over Facebook's Removal Of Videos Of People Urinating
Re:
230 lets site moderate - they can remove lawful or unlawful content.
On the post: Report Says DHS Can't Manage Internal Misconduct Because The DHS Just Doesn't Do Anything About Internal Misconduct
The first rule of DHS - Don't talk about DHS.
Next >>