Re: Re: Re: Re: Questions to ask and the OpenWatch recorder
We are not referring to states. We are referring to national policies of the federal government.
I'm quite certain that previous to said states "significant changes" of drug law that there were equal amounts of loud objection and reasonable argument. Accepting that finally a platform was made available for the latter. We do not yet have a viable platform therefore any approach deemed appropriate, baring violence, is perfectly acceptable in bringing about some much needed insight into these things we are so clearly in conflict with.
So, no, I do not recognize your exception as justification to now allow an individual, any individual, to express, investigate, illuminate or disagree in general with present policy.
Re: Re: Questions to ask and the OpenWatch recorder
And here we are. Discussing the topic in a public forum. Multiple minds digesting a very real situation. And you're suggestion? Keep your opinions to yourself until you can talk with someone that, supposedly, both cares and can do something about it? Well, you've a penchant for being a bit of a fruitcake, no?
Even assholes can build awareness to this conditioning process. More people should be assholes when confronted. And more and more people. That you, apparently, are willing to oblige interrogation does not make said interrogation right, proper or justified.
It seems you would rather condemn his actions than to condemn the actions the brought about the situation. I find that submissive not too mention contrary to any entities that claim to wield a beacon of freedom.
Much like the guy in the red shirt - I commend him and approve.
eh? Fuck you. Some people are adverse to confrontation, or merely the potential for it, under any circumstances. Some people do not like other people that they do not know or desire to know.
Some people consider freedom of movement a natural right which would include unchallenged movement within public spaces.
The only thing risky right now are ankle grabbers like yourself allowing this country, the US, to be allowed to creep slowly and assuredly into the authoritarian category.
It's not like we have an ongoing state of guerrilla warfare now is it? Rebels? An impending invasion perhaps? No, I didn't think so either.
I, for one, am not willing to die for a country that is no longer willing to let me live. That would indicate that this country is not the same country that I was living in a mere decade ago.
What you're alluding to in your pissed off little rant is not, by any logical measure, freedom.
I will be happy when people like you are called out for being chumps. I would be happy if there were truly a state of ongoing threat that could possibly justify interrogation and checkpoints based upon the mere movement of people.
Safety does not equal acquiescence to the whims of a government corrupt with an intent to impose and require submission.
I spied a few of these "but it wasn't the TSA" which is the truth and is fine however it is the same basic matter of presence, reasoning, drive and conditioning. In essence they're copycats feeding on the flames of freedom burning that the TSA's existence fans.
Like it or not there is no dress code for flying. It's good you've found a way to make it easier for yourself and suggest other folks could do the same but that is pretty far from the point. The point being - Wear. What. You. Please. Conceding is not something any veteran or any citizen with a basic understanding of what this country stands for would advocate and nor should you.
au contraire - it is a most effective means of protest and an equally effective means of displaying clear disapproval in the context that matters most. Any coverage of this fascist nonsense is good coverage.
He should be commended for having the balls.
Once you're afraid to speak your mind you're better off dead.
I'm pretty sure we have about five viable candidates. "Wasting votes" aside it's the media rigging and dual-party coordinated shutdown methods that force the US into a walking dead result. These methods bring about the forced perception that approximately 50% of the voting public is "behind" one candidate or the other candidate. When it does happen to suite one of the two parties' agenda then they'll play up the "other option", hell they'll even help financially under cover.
It's high time we vote conscience and forgo the false dream of betterment from the top two.
This is so big of a problem that it's not really a problem is it? I think I would like to default that they're holding to their stated missions - national security. Not a horrible thing, by default.
What we have here are the makings of "what was once fiction" (which, in fact, is oft repeated). It seems to be getting worse too. A string match grows into a catalog string match grows into a records collection grows into a full past and present locations collection grows into a full finance trace and voila - profile. So, yes, we are all cataloged where any root product of the day happens to exist. It's the "root product of the day" that we should be wary of. It would seem some are wary but now the beast has outgrown its cage. Being wary is wholly insufficient. Transgressions will continue and the glamor and prestige and finance of gaining and maintaining a political position combined with party ownership is resulting in accelerated deterioration of this particular form of government in this particular country it would seem.
The government agencies - the product of legislation and executive administrations are overwhelming the continent. They're overwhelming the people with power, authority, bureaucracy, selective enforcement, uncontained and manipulative rules of engagement. Then we have the ever more powerful large, multi-national corporations (about 14 filthy rich guys I'd guess). Particularly egregious their influence is.
Life is still good right now - tough but good, yes? We can only string along content with government by economy for so long though. I guess how long is the question. How long is too long? How soon is now? And why would a lot of these "lightly armed" government agencies be requisitioning ammunition? Hollow point?
So, I guess the "problem" is not one of prevention or containment anymore is it? A bit like diplomacy with Hitler that.
I think, and it is just a thought, that we are on the verge of requiring an altogether new means of governing. I mean if this Internet thing has anything to show us then having a couple hundred well heeled representatives is sadly insufficient. Underrepresented is the word I think, and how. Worries about who fucks who, who smokes what and who wears what to church and which church has no place in national policies. None. At all. Not this nation. Not any nation if I had any say. Anyway, seriously though, that's the damn deal with copyright? Who put them in charge?
Re: User generated is possible-- if the user actually does the work
distribution is no longer a limited and finite logistic. I'm continually dumbfounded by the lack of engagement and creativity by those that would benefit the most.
All this uppity nonsense around who is right and who is wrong is appalling. INNOVATE (or die) and, for the record, strong-arming is not innovation. It's hole digging and they're getting deep.
Here we have an EXTREMELY SMALL HANDFUL of organizations representing THE ENTIRETY OF THE COPYRIGHT REALM and you're good with that? No offense but - you're an idiot.
Hmm. Actually I think it's more of "If you'd like to stop bailing water out of your sinking ship you're about 1nm from a safe harbour where you can repair the damage and get back on course in very little time" approach.
If "pirate-apologism" continues to be what props up the blatant realities of communications than so be it. It's your fault and yours alone whether or not you can succeed. Or choose to rather.
We are no longer born kings - we are all kings. -me
“ALL links or access to content provided by ANYONE are infringing, unless you can prove that you have obtained explicit permission from the DEATH GRIP OF POWER OVER MEDIA THAT IS US for that content,” was FACT’s response.
Fixed that. They must've been drinking martinis at the time.
It's been clear for some time that "user generated content" competes with "corporate media management" thus the war is definitely for total control. Even your blogs and chat logs are not immune from an offensive such as this.
The thing is that we, the public, know the strength of the enemy. The Great Media Wars are upon us, indeed. Taunt the enemy from every quarter. Extend the skirmish lines beyond enemy lines. Harass their generals where and when they sleep so that they cannot sleep. The corporate media cartel is the enemy and the Constitution, the rule of law and the public are the spoils. Copyright is the weapon. Will the spoils be captured, tortured and enslaved or will they remain to be the foundations of an evolving humanity for the betterment of all? Mmm, yeah, I'm still on the fence. The fence that guards the piked heads.
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re: Re: Re: Questions to ask and the OpenWatch recorder
I'm quite certain that previous to said states "significant changes" of drug law that there were equal amounts of loud objection and reasonable argument. Accepting that finally a platform was made available for the latter. We do not yet have a viable platform therefore any approach deemed appropriate, baring violence, is perfectly acceptable in bringing about some much needed insight into these things we are so clearly in conflict with.
So, no, I do not recognize your exception as justification to now allow an individual, any individual, to express, investigate, illuminate or disagree in general with present policy.
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re: Questions to ask and the OpenWatch recorder
Hows that drug war working out for you?
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re:
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re:
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re:
It seems you would rather condemn his actions than to condemn the actions the brought about the situation. I find that submissive not too mention contrary to any entities that claim to wield a beacon of freedom.
Much like the guy in the red shirt - I commend him and approve.
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: The TSA's Infamous 'Behavior Detection' In Action: Mandatory 'Chats' About Every Detail Of Your Trip
Re:
Some people consider freedom of movement a natural right which would include unchallenged movement within public spaces.
The only thing risky right now are ankle grabbers like yourself allowing this country, the US, to be allowed to creep slowly and assuredly into the authoritarian category.
It's not like we have an ongoing state of guerrilla warfare now is it? Rebels? An impending invasion perhaps? No, I didn't think so either.
I, for one, am not willing to die for a country that is no longer willing to let me live. That would indicate that this country is not the same country that I was living in a mere decade ago.
What you're alluding to in your pissed off little rant is not, by any logical measure, freedom.
I will be happy when people like you are called out for being chumps. I would be happy if there were truly a state of ongoing threat that could possibly justify interrogation and checkpoints based upon the mere movement of people.
Safety does not equal acquiescence to the whims of a government corrupt with an intent to impose and require submission.
On the post: TSA Declares Themselves Fashion & Funny Police
Re: Re:
On the post: TSA Declares Themselves Fashion & Funny Police
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: TSA Declares Themselves Fashion & Funny Police
Re: Re: Wierd
On the post: Oops: After Seizing & Censoring Rojadirecta For 18 Months, Feds Give Up & Drop Case
Re: Pshhhh!
On the post: TSA Declares Themselves Fashion & Funny Police
Re: Dressing up...
Why make it easier if that's not your disposition? To hell with the path of least resistance.
An entire nation cowed by fucking terrorists. Awesome. We are so worthy.
On the post: TSA Declares Themselves Fashion & Funny Police
Re:
On the post: TSA Declares Themselves Fashion & Funny Police
Re:
He should be commended for having the balls.
Once you're afraid to speak your mind you're better off dead.
Getting close, eh?
Common sense is irrelevant, clearly.
On the post: NSA Whistleblower Explains How The NSA Is Collecting Data On All Of You (And He's Sorry About It)
Re: Re: Re:
It's high time we vote conscience and forgo the false dream of betterment from the top two.
On the post: NSA Whistleblower Explains How The NSA Is Collecting Data On All Of You (And He's Sorry About It)
Problem?
What we have here are the makings of "what was once fiction" (which, in fact, is oft repeated). It seems to be getting worse too. A string match grows into a catalog string match grows into a records collection grows into a full past and present locations collection grows into a full finance trace and voila - profile. So, yes, we are all cataloged where any root product of the day happens to exist. It's the "root product of the day" that we should be wary of. It would seem some are wary but now the beast has outgrown its cage. Being wary is wholly insufficient. Transgressions will continue and the glamor and prestige and finance of gaining and maintaining a political position combined with party ownership is resulting in accelerated deterioration of this particular form of government in this particular country it would seem.
The government agencies - the product of legislation and executive administrations are overwhelming the continent. They're overwhelming the people with power, authority, bureaucracy, selective enforcement, uncontained and manipulative rules of engagement. Then we have the ever more powerful large, multi-national corporations (about 14 filthy rich guys I'd guess). Particularly egregious their influence is.
Life is still good right now - tough but good, yes? We can only string along content with government by economy for so long though. I guess how long is the question. How long is too long? How soon is now? And why would a lot of these "lightly armed" government agencies be requisitioning ammunition? Hollow point?
So, I guess the "problem" is not one of prevention or containment anymore is it? A bit like diplomacy with Hitler that.
I think, and it is just a thought, that we are on the verge of requiring an altogether new means of governing. I mean if this Internet thing has anything to show us then having a couple hundred well heeled representatives is sadly insufficient. Underrepresented is the word I think, and how. Worries about who fucks who, who smokes what and who wears what to church and which church has no place in national policies. None. At all. Not this nation. Not any nation if I had any say. Anyway, seriously though, that's the damn deal with copyright? Who put them in charge?
On the post: Guilty Until Proven Licensed: FACT Shuts Down Torrent Tracker Despite Cooperation
Re: User generated is possible-- if the user actually does the work
All this uppity nonsense around who is right and who is wrong is appalling. INNOVATE (or die) and, for the record, strong-arming is not innovation. It's hole digging and they're getting deep.
Here we have an EXTREMELY SMALL HANDFUL of organizations representing THE ENTIRETY OF THE COPYRIGHT REALM and you're good with that? No offense but - you're an idiot.
On the post: Guilty Until Proven Licensed: FACT Shuts Down Torrent Tracker Despite Cooperation
Re: Re: Re:
If "pirate-apologism" continues to be what props up the blatant realities of communications than so be it. It's your fault and yours alone whether or not you can succeed. Or choose to rather.
We are no longer born kings - we are all kings. -me
On the post: Guilty Until Proven Licensed: FACT Shuts Down Torrent Tracker Despite Cooperation
Fixed that. They must've been drinking martinis at the time.
It's been clear for some time that "user generated content" competes with "corporate media management" thus the war is definitely for total control. Even your blogs and chat logs are not immune from an offensive such as this.
The thing is that we, the public, know the strength of the enemy. The Great Media Wars are upon us, indeed. Taunt the enemy from every quarter. Extend the skirmish lines beyond enemy lines. Harass their generals where and when they sleep so that they cannot sleep. The corporate media cartel is the enemy and the Constitution, the rule of law and the public are the spoils. Copyright is the weapon. Will the spoils be captured, tortured and enslaved or will they remain to be the foundations of an evolving humanity for the betterment of all? Mmm, yeah, I'm still on the fence. The fence that guards the piked heads.
On the post: Samsung Routed In Apple Patent Fight; Told To Pay $1.05 Billion
Re:
Next >>