Memories lost in a nation's sleep
In the dreams of contented sheep
Can we ever hope to find solutions
When our country has sold the Constitution
All too wrong to be right
The answer's there, we just lack the sight
Race wars fed by prejudice and fright
The love of a nation for its people
burned through the night
"Under penalty of perjury I certify that the information contained in the notification is both true and accurate, and I have the authority to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright(s) involved."
"if it was automatically created"
Does not matter if a billy goat initiated the request it is the accuser that needs to confirm if their request is accurate.
In case you missed it:
Under penalty of perjury I certify that the information contained in the notification is both true and accurate.
What spin? The poor ISP blocks what they think is reasonable due to a court order, and then they get their hand slapped for blocking too much. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Because ya know, all of the US's laws are clearly spelled out and not open to interpretation. /s
" A song made up for samples isn't imitation, it's duplication."
B-Boys
3rd Bass
and on
and on
"We aren't advancing very quickly if all we are doing is duplicating yesterday."
Greetards cant see past their own nose.
"We are advancing very quickly if we are allowed to duplicate and BUILD UPON yesterday."
FTFY
" Seems like the only thing it hurts is your ability to pirate other people's property."
Um.. douche... it has no bearing on pirates. You can have all the IP and death penalties you want, and piracy still happens.
"they create the property that you guys love so much you're willing to violate other people's rights to get it."
You ass-u-me too much grasshopper. Your ilk look at anyone with alternate views as a pirate, and immediately assume, incorrectly, that we all have BT clients running and are downloading shit all the time. So sad, grasshopper. What a shitty world view.
" How just admit that you can't get enough copyrighted works, and meet somewhere in the middle?"
You need to tell this to the content industry. They went wayyyyyyyyy past middle a long long time ago. We are just struggling to get back to middle. Sheesh indeed.
There are laws that make sense and those that dont. Like it being illegal to sit on top of a fridge outside. http://www.squidoo.com/dumbcrazylaws
Copyright is one of them. When you try to get 150000 for sharing 3 songs the populace realizes how absurd it is and the industry that pushes for crazy shit like loses all respect with people.
The entertainment industry has cried wolf for EVERY STINKIN new piece of technology that hey have ended up benefiting from.
They blew it with Napster. They had the chance to tap into millions upon millions of kids with a monthly service fee if they had made N legit. But nooooooo.
ITS NOT ABOUT MONEY IT'S ABOUT CONTROLL. (Yeah I know)
IP is a joke. It has been made so by the industry. Life +70. People see that and realize how absolutely asinine that is and don't respect it.
It not about protecting content creators. Its about locking up rights for as long as possible so the corporations can control it.
Its OK. I know YOU obeyed every law of the land this week right?
Didnt j-walk, didnt go over the speed limit, didnt litter, didnt spit, etc, and on and on.
BULLSHIT!!!!
So what Mike advocates and I agree with this whole-heatedly is sensible IP. 5-7 years. If you cant make money or bring something to market within that time, it is time to let someone that can. Peace.
Pretty soon FR will be incorporated in to the surveillance grid that is being set up so every move is tracked. Then there is the tag tracking software the will follow your car on the freeway and every other road that has cameras. They will track your financial records. They follow you through your phone. When do we stop it? When will enough be enough?
"We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution."
Abraham Lincoln
"The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible."
On the post: US, UK Betray Basic Values To Get Assange At Any Cost
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Memories lost in a nation's sleep
In the dreams of contented sheep
Can we ever hope to find solutions
When our country has sold the Constitution
All too wrong to be right
The answer's there, we just lack the sight
Race wars fed by prejudice and fright
The love of a nation for its people
burned through the night
On the post: US, UK Betray Basic Values To Get Assange At Any Cost
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Politician All For Transparency Until It Might Make Him Look Bad In A Campaign Commercial
Feed
On the post: Universal Music Uses Bogus DMCA Claim To Take Down Negative Review Of Drake's Album
Re:
"if it was automatically created"
Does not matter if a billy goat initiated the request it is the accuser that needs to confirm if their request is accurate.
In case you missed it:
Under penalty of perjury I certify that the information contained in the notification is both true and accurate.
On the post: Universal Music Uses Bogus DMCA Claim To Take Down Negative Review Of Drake's Album
Re: Re:
On the post: Indian ISP Penalized For 'Overblocking' In Obeying Court Order To Try To Stop Infringement
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Indian ISP Penalized For 'Overblocking' In Obeying Court Order To Try To Stop Infringement
Re:
Because ya know, all of the US's laws are clearly spelled out and not open to interpretation. /s
On the post: TSA Racial Profiling May Hide Larger Constitutional Problem
Re: Say What?
I heard my ancestors speak of such a thing. Something about laws and rights. Where did it go?
On the post: A Fee-Based Twitter Is No More Ideologically Pure Than An Ad-Supported Twitter
Re:
On the post: It's Never Enough: Both RIAA & MPAA Aren't Satisfied With Google Punishing 'Pirate' Sites
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Why Copyright & Patent Laws Go Against How We Create
Re: Re:
B-Boys
3rd Bass
and on
and on
"We aren't advancing very quickly if all we are doing is duplicating yesterday."
Greetards cant see past their own nose.
"We are advancing very quickly if we are allowed to duplicate and BUILD UPON yesterday."
FTFY
On the post: Help Define How The US Government Promotes Innovation Over The Next Four Years
Re: Verification picture
On the post: Help Define How The US Government Promotes Innovation Over The Next Four Years
Verification picture
FF 14.0.1
I will Try on IE.
On the post: Entrepreneurs & VCs Tell The White House To Focus On Innovation, Rather Than IP Enforcement
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The drugs will wear off soon.
On the post: Entrepreneurs & VCs Tell The White House To Focus On Innovation, Rather Than IP Enforcement
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Um.. douche... it has no bearing on pirates. You can have all the IP and death penalties you want, and piracy still happens.
"they create the property that you guys love so much you're willing to violate other people's rights to get it."
You ass-u-me too much grasshopper. Your ilk look at anyone with alternate views as a pirate, and immediately assume, incorrectly, that we all have BT clients running and are downloading shit all the time. So sad, grasshopper. What a shitty world view.
" How just admit that you can't get enough copyrighted works, and meet somewhere in the middle?"
You need to tell this to the content industry. They went wayyyyyyyyy past middle a long long time ago. We are just struggling to get back to middle. Sheesh indeed.
On the post: Entrepreneurs & VCs Tell The White House To Focus On Innovation, Rather Than IP Enforcement
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.squidoo.com/dumbcrazylaws
Copyright is one of them. When you try to get 150000 for sharing 3 songs the populace realizes how absurd it is and the industry that pushes for crazy shit like loses all respect with people.
The entertainment industry has cried wolf for EVERY STINKIN new piece of technology that hey have ended up benefiting from.
They blew it with Napster. They had the chance to tap into millions upon millions of kids with a monthly service fee if they had made N legit. But nooooooo.
ITS NOT ABOUT MONEY IT'S ABOUT CONTROLL. (Yeah I know)
IP is a joke. It has been made so by the industry. Life +70. People see that and realize how absolutely asinine that is and don't respect it.
It not about protecting content creators. Its about locking up rights for as long as possible so the corporations can control it.
Its OK. I know YOU obeyed every law of the land this week right?
Didnt j-walk, didnt go over the speed limit, didnt litter, didnt spit, etc, and on and on.
BULLSHIT!!!!
So what Mike advocates and I agree with this whole-heatedly is sensible IP. 5-7 years. If you cant make money or bring something to market within that time, it is time to let someone that can. Peace.
On the post: Entrepreneurs & VCs Tell The White House To Focus On Innovation, Rather Than IP Enforcement
Re:
Greedtard cool-aide is not an acceptable answer.
On the post: Is Facebook's Facial Recognition That Scary?
Where does it stop?
I am not a farm animal to be tagged and tracked.
On the post: Is Facebook's Facial Recognition That Scary?
I still don't see it as being that concerning
On the post: Court: Feds Can Spy On Americans Without Warrants With No Legal Repurcussions
Re: TV's
Abraham Lincoln
"The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible."
Senator Hubert H. Humprey (D-Minnesota)
Remote in America, yeah right.
Next >>