Re: Re: Re: ... Then why are they still on the payroll?
If my work currently revolves around contracts then the time I actually need to spend in the office is restricted to when i really need a dual monitor to work
If that's why you're going in to the office... monitors are pretty cheap.
Against this wasn’t an address to the public, either.
In that the entirety of the US population wasn't in the room? It was a daily press briefing. What exactly do you think those are for?
How you get to shoot up with cleaners from that is beyond me!
It's right there in black and white, in language that is about as clear as Trump ever gets. But I'm not surprised at this point that it's beyond you.
trump isn’t a doctor and was simply asking about it.
What is "it"? You keep saying it's not injecting cleaning supplies, but I have yet to see your explanation of what exactly he was suggesting, if not that.
Absolutely did not suggest injecting Bleach, or any non-medically approved substance.
What do you think he was talking about injecting then?
Bleach is what the talking point is.
No, it isn't. You're the one insisting it's about bleach, and I'm pretty sure it's because that's the only way you can be semi-right about it. I can't discount the possibility that you are just having trouble understanding it though, because you seem to be having trouble understanding a lot of things.
Anyone who ingested cleaners without medical order is an idiot.
Correct, Trump supporters are idiots.
Maybe read the actual transcript
It's been quoted, in full, multiple times. There is no further context that can save you here. You are quite simply defending the former president for suggesting we inject cleaning products into people.
Your flat out wrong on all counts.
You have yet to identify a single aspect of this matter that I have gotten wrong. And it's "you're".
Like I said: never did trump tell anyone to inject bleach! Or even imply someone should do that. The bleach bit is a progressive lie. Period.
When multiple people have told you over and over again that the problem is that the president suggested researching injecting disinfectants into the human body, why do you go back to the word "bleach" every time? Do you think it's perfectly fine that he did that, as long as he didn't use the word "bleach"? Are you aware that many people ingested household cleaners after he said that?
It was a question to an advisor on the current status of covid research.
During a live press conference. One can only imagine the idiocy he spouted behind closed doors if he was willing to say that with the cameras rolling.
What we want is for multibillion dollar international corporations to be able to silence or prevent from speaking about 70 million Americans who have opinions we DON'T like, so that we can peacefully uphold and practice democracy with only the people who agree with us.
What we want is for the constitution and private property rights to be respected.
I see. I suppose that would have to be categorized as sane, but I would say it's misguided, as all it will do is ensure that nobody will vet content ahead of time (or at least doing so would be insane under such a regimen). So it is at best useless, and at worst discouraging something that should at least be permitted.
On the post: Arizona County's Voting Machines Rendered Unusable By OAN-Financed Vote Auditors
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Conflict of interest? Never heard of it'
i before a on this one: Chiang.
On the post: Florida Man Signs Blatantly Corrupt And Unconstitutional Social Media Bill, Cementing Florida As Tech Laughing Stock
Re: Re:
Getting out the flamethrower.
OK, you got me.
On the post: FCC's Carr Thinks 'Big Tech' Should Subsidize His Pals In 'Big Telecom'
Re: Re: Telecom should pay...
Or C) it was a joke.
On the post: Employees Are Feeling Burned Over Broken Work-From-Home Promises As Employers Try To Bring Them Back To The Office
Re: Re: Re: ... Then why are they still on the payroll?
If that's why you're going in to the office... monitors are pretty cheap.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re:
In that the entirety of the US population wasn't in the room? It was a daily press briefing. What exactly do you think those are for?
It's right there in black and white, in language that is about as clear as Trump ever gets. But I'm not surprised at this point that it's beyond you.
What is "it"? You keep saying it's not injecting cleaning supplies, but I have yet to see your explanation of what exactly he was suggesting, if not that.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re: Re: Re:
What do you think he was talking about injecting then?
No, it isn't. You're the one insisting it's about bleach, and I'm pretty sure it's because that's the only way you can be semi-right about it. I can't discount the possibility that you are just having trouble understanding it though, because you seem to be having trouble understanding a lot of things.
Correct, Trump supporters are idiots.
It's been quoted, in full, multiple times. There is no further context that can save you here. You are quite simply defending the former president for suggesting we inject cleaning products into people.
You have yet to identify a single aspect of this matter that I have gotten wrong. And it's "you're".
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re:
When multiple people have told you over and over again that the problem is that the president suggested researching injecting disinfectants into the human body, why do you go back to the word "bleach" every time? Do you think it's perfectly fine that he did that, as long as he didn't use the word "bleach"? Are you aware that many people ingested household cleaners after he said that?
During a live press conference. One can only imagine the idiocy he spouted behind closed doors if he was willing to say that with the cameras rolling.
On the post: Florida Man Signs Blatantly Corrupt And Unconstitutional Social Media Bill, Cementing Florida As Tech Laughing Stock
Re: Totally censorious
What we want is for the constitution and private property rights to be respected.
On the post: Florida Man Signs Blatantly Corrupt And Unconstitutional Social Media Bill, Cementing Florida As Tech Laughing Stock
Re: 'All animals are equal, political animals are more equal tho
Only the first two?
On the post: Arizona County's Voting Machines Rendered Unusable By OAN-Financed Vote Auditors
Re: Re: Re: liability
But it is the state that has to pay, so the county wouldn't have standing to sue to recover that money.
On the post: Arizona County's Voting Machines Rendered Unusable By OAN-Financed Vote Auditors
Re: Re: Re: Re: Burden of proof is on "officials&qu
"After relentlessly spamming the site I finally got some comments to post. I just can't understand why my posts get caught in the spam filter."
On the post: Arizona County's Voting Machines Rendered Unusable By OAN-Financed Vote Auditors
Re: Re: If you can't win an honest game rig it until you do.
What's a liberal conservative?
On the post: Violent, Bigoted Cop Accused Of Beating Another Cop Is Upset His Text Messages Expose Him As A Violent Bigot
Re: OJ on every TV was designed to destroy Jury independence
Juries decide questions of fact; judges decide questions of law.
https://law.jrank.org/pages/9609/Question-Law.html
On the post: Smart TV Makers Will Soon Make More Money Off Your Viewing Habits Than The TV Itself
Re: Tip Of The Iceberg
How is the data getting to the manufacturer then?
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re:
In particular, they feel that Hillary Clinton didn't receive enough punishment for Bill's blow job.
On the post: If There's A Defamatory Review On Yelp, Is It Google's Job To Hide It?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I see. I suppose that would have to be categorized as sane, but I would say it's misguided, as all it will do is ensure that nobody will vet content ahead of time (or at least doing so would be insane under such a regimen). So it is at best useless, and at worst discouraging something that should at least be permitted.
On the post: If There's A Defamatory Review On Yelp, Is It Google's Job To Hide It?
Re: Side Step
It's happened, folks. Koby made a reasonable comment on a story about content moderation.
On the post: If There's A Defamatory Review On Yelp, Is It Google's Job To Hide It?
Re: Re:
What do you mean, if the platform decides not to let it post it at all, they're liable, but if they let it go up and then take it down, they're not?
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re:
Sadly, this is probably true.
As long as that doesn't involve admitting Trump made any mistakes.
On the post: The Flopping Of Trump's Blog Proves That It's Not Free Speech He's Upset About; But Free Reach
Re: Re:
For anyone who somehow doesn't believe Trump is sexist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqE4hKIP4n0
Watch that, and tell me that person respects women.
Next >>