Ok, ok, I'm dying here Blue Balls.
After challenging you to back up your viewpoints, explain your contradictions, explain how I'm lying when I point out your lies, call you on your white power rhetoric, and point to your frequent racist attacks...
You run away and cry, "But those smart Randians will make short work of you! You can't make fun of me there!"
Is Reason the fruit of your labor? Does Reason have a no moderation policy? Hmmm. Seems like you claim that they will censor my speech there.
How does this make sense to you? Run away with your blue balls, and your tail between your legs ya cornfed coward.
Imagine you have your own website. With articles and comments. (I know it's a stretch, right?)
How long would it take you to kick me off the site?
(You don't have to answer this, we all know the answer. You talk tough but will turn with your tail between your legs when it comes to citation, action, honesty, or fairness.)
You already called for me to be banned today. So try to answer without lying.
If 230 is revoked all comment sections will disappear, including those frequented by conservatives ... I wonder if they thought about that before demanding its revocation.
Holy shit can you even imagine what "Viewpoint Neutral" would look like at InfoWars? Or FOX? (El Cheetos looses his whig just because they occasionally cover Democrats!)
So would Fox need to provide equal time to both parties to make this work?
"Gary", you are actually Timothy Geigner aka "Dark Helmet", who first used the "Blue Balls" name WAY back, years before your account was started. You're a thorough liar, and just from above, clearly a rabid fanboy.
You do realize that sounds quite insane Blue Balls. (Your preferred name, absent any other input.)
You actually replied - without answering anything, but hey.
Liar? Citation needed, Cornfed! We all have seen multiple links with you lying. (Cabbage Law! A1 Racist Person!!)
Other considerations, such as not tearing society apart with idiot hostility such as yours, are more important.
Wow you can't even rail against ad-homs without making an ad-hom. Priceless.
Since you believe in free speech - please show us Your free speech site that does better than TD?
Since you believe that society shouldn't be tearing itself apart, why do you spout racist drivel?
Is there a name you'd prefer to be called other than "Blue Balls" btw?
False advertising (deepfakes are one example of this) is amplified by platforms
What you are really advocating is the abolition of Platforms. And free speech. But that makes sense - if you run a scam self help business, user reviews would really hurt your business model!
If their lay-off include all of CNN then they are doing a great job.
REAL news comes from Info Wars! We need to know that Hillary is REALLY running a sex slave operation from a pizza shop. They aren't afraid to tell the REAL stories.
Like that one where the fake school full of actors pretended to have a massacre in order to discredit the guns. That was REAL news.
/s, and El Cheetos saying he doesn't like the coverage doesn't make it "Dishonest" ya MAGAt.
On the post: Senator Hawley Proposes Law To Force Internet Companies To Beg The FTC For Permission To Host Content
Re: Re: Re: Techdirt downvotes Trolls
Ok, ok, I'm dying here Blue Balls.
After challenging you to back up your viewpoints, explain your contradictions, explain how I'm lying when I point out your lies, call you on your white power rhetoric, and point to your frequent racist attacks...
You run away and cry, "But those smart Randians will make short work of you! You can't make fun of me there!"
Is Reason the fruit of your labor? Does Reason have a no moderation policy? Hmmm. Seems like you claim that they will censor my speech there.
How does this make sense to you? Run away with your blue balls, and your tail between your legs ya cornfed coward.
On the post: Kim Kardashian Deep Fake Video Removed By Copyright Claim
Re:
I have a question: how can it be copyrighted if its fake?
It's called "Copyright Creep" and it lets you drop the Copyright hammer on things clearly not covered by existing laws because "Ownership."
On the post: FBI Serves Incredibly Broad Warrant To 8chan, Demanding Info On All Users Who Responded To A Shooter's Post
Re: Re: Re: Re: The provocateurs particularly
My work here is done.
Lying again, eh Blue Balls?
On the post: FBI Serves Incredibly Broad Warrant To 8chan, Demanding Info On All Users Who Responded To A Shooter's Post
Re: Re: Re: Re: The FBI Trolls
No, you "get" it the way your prejudice and hatred has it. You are LYING.
Lying? I don't think you know what that word actually means anymore Blue Balls.
Did I misrepresent a fact, or state an opinion?
Have you or someone other AC said things that would support my opinion? The answer is Yes.
You in particular rail against the Zionist threat, open borders, and left-wing oppression. Which ALL ALIGN WITH the views of the shooter.
On the post: FBI Serves Incredibly Broad Warrant To 8chan, Demanding Info On All Users Who Responded To A Shooter's Post
Re: Re: The FBI Trolls
No prejudice there, eh?
We get it Blue - you support the shooter.
On the post: Senator Hawley Proposes Law To Force Internet Companies To Beg The FTC For Permission To Host Content
Re: Techdirt downvotes Trolls
suddenly the working browser session quit! ODD, ain't it?
The fact that your racist ass doesn't know how to properly use a computer is not proof of anything, eh cornfed?
Put up or shut up - show us how a REAL website is run! (Tail, between legs.)
On the post: Senator Hawley Proposes Law To Force Internet Companies To Beg The FTC For Permission To Host Content
Re: Re: Re: Okay, you've answered your question
Ok Blue Balls -
Imagine you have your own website. With articles and comments. (I know it's a stretch, right?)
How long would it take you to kick me off the site?
(You don't have to answer this, we all know the answer. You talk tough but will turn with your tail between your legs when it comes to citation, action, honesty, or fairness.)
You already called for me to be banned today. So try to answer without lying.
On the post: Senator Hawley Proposes Law To Force Internet Companies To Beg The FTC For Permission To Host Content
Re: Re: Re: Re: Got your Troll
Hey remember when Blue Balls said it was awful to censor anyone? (Except Zionists of course - he hates jews.)
But Here is he demanding that I be censored. Love it!!
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190614/20280842406/congress-now-creating-moral-panic-around -deepfakes-order-to-change-cda-230.shtml#c487
And refusing to cite, of course. Blue Balls and Tail Between Legs.
On the post: Senator Hawley Proposes Law To Force Internet Companies To Beg The FTC For Permission To Host Content
Re: Re:
Because someone might want you to bake a cake ... oh wait a sec, these folk are hypocrites.
Exactly! If you want to withold service to gays and blacks and the irish that just makes you a racist - but not a hypocrite.
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: "TROLL" is ALREADY MODERATED!
YOUR WORDS would not be tolerated on a decent site.
So you are saying you don't believe in my free speech, only yours? Love It!!!
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Re: Re: Politically Neutral
If 230 is revoked all comment sections will disappear, including those frequented by conservatives ... I wonder if they thought about that before demanding its revocation.
Holy shit can you even imagine what "Viewpoint Neutral" would look like at InfoWars? Or FOX? (El Cheetos looses his whig just because they occasionally cover Democrats!)
So would Fox need to provide equal time to both parties to make this work?
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: "TROLL" is ALREADY MODERATED!
"Gary", you are actually Timothy Geigner aka "Dark Helmet", who first used the "Blue Balls" name WAY back, years before your account was started. You're a thorough liar, and just from above, clearly a rabid fanboy.
You do realize that sounds quite insane Blue Balls. (Your preferred name, absent any other input.)
You actually replied - without answering anything, but hey.
Liar? Citation needed, Cornfed! We all have seen multiple links with you lying. (Cabbage Law! A1 Racist Person!!)
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Re:
Good point AC - does this proposal even attempt to define a deep fake?
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Re:
And then logically to absurdities like that Nazi Germany cannot be defined as UN-reasonable.
We get it - you love Nazi Germany, Blue. You attack the Jews every chance you get.
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Re: Re: "TROLL" is ALREADY MODERATED!
Other considerations, such as not tearing society apart with idiot hostility such as yours, are more important.
Wow you can't even rail against ad-homs without making an ad-hom. Priceless.
Since you believe in free speech - please show us Your free speech site that does better than TD?
Since you believe that society shouldn't be tearing itself apart, why do you spout racist drivel?
Is there a name you'd prefer to be called other than "Blue Balls" btw?
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Good Fakes
So if a fake is a good effort, then there is no easy way of telling so how are platforms supposed to censor what that can't detect?
On the post: Congress Now Creating A Moral Panic Around Deepfakes In Order To Change CDA 230
Re:
False advertising (deepfakes are one example of this) is amplified by platforms
What you are really advocating is the abolition of Platforms. And free speech. But that makes sense - if you run a scam self help business, user reviews would really hurt your business model!
On the post: AT&T Lays Off Thousands After Nabbing Billions In Tax Breaks And Regulatory Favors
Re:
If their lay-off include all of CNN then they are doing a great job.
REAL news comes from Info Wars! We need to know that Hillary is REALLY running a sex slave operation from a pizza shop. They aren't afraid to tell the REAL stories.
Like that one where the fake school full of actors pretended to have a massacre in order to discredit the guns. That was REAL news.
/s, and El Cheetos saying he doesn't like the coverage doesn't make it "Dishonest" ya MAGAt.
On the post: The Copyright Fights Over The Australian Aborigine Flag Continue To Demonstrate Copyright Insanity
Re: Re:
Retroactive copyright application is unlikely to raise an eyebrow from IP's advocates.
Simply because staunch IP advocates hate the public domain, open source and creative commons is just some form of theft or disease.
On the post: New Zealand Man Gets 21 Months In Prison For Sharing Footage Of The Christchurch Shooting
Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Bullshit" defined as that with which you disagree.
Endless spam test posts are bullshit, so yeah.
Next >>