Are you still assuming each customer will connect to one satellite at a time, or that each city will be served by only a handful of satellites at a time? SpaceX is already on the record stating to the FCC that they will perform well enough to compete with fiber and outpace cable. They're not in the habit of lying like the terrestrial ISPs. Best acquaint yourself with the available information, or are you confessing to being an ISP publicist? ; ]
Also, don't forget that those satellites not otherwise occupied will still be relaying the backhaul at unprecedented speeds and at the full speed of light, unlike fiber which tops out at about 0.66c, no matter how much data is moving.
The flat-plate phased array antennas they intend to use on the ground and on each satellite will maintain multiple connections at all times, all at 5G rates. The whole idea is to be competitive with cable and fiber, using much newer and more powerful technology than you assume all satellites are hobbled by.
Read the Wikipedia page. Follow the links to the Ku and Ka bands and the hardware too.
7,518 plus 4,425 satellites, spaced only a few degrees apart means there will always be a lot more than a handful in view at any time and connections will likely be 5G-like speeds.
…only changes some methods of penalty and process.
Physical evasion does not negate laws or regulation. Those DOING BUSINESS in any jurisdiction are subject to it's laws and regulations, no matter their location.
The Dotcom case is an example where Biden caused U.S. authorities to ignore normal legal processes which could have worked and tried to make an experimental criminal precedent. That created the quagmire which outlived Biden's VP career and is likely to see him sued for costs once it collapses.
"First - nothing of what you said has any bearing on the law surrounding this case."
The Court mentioned both points I listed in their discussion of the safeguards they apparently were thinking about. Presumably, if the guy hadn't run off to be a "jihadi" and was still alive today, that test of theirs may have weighed more favourably to the appeal, so both points are, in fact, central to the case as THEY saw it.
"Second - you'll note that already said it was bad form and didn't like it.
Third - my criticism of the case was in it's characterization. There was no forced disclosure of secret sources, because they were ALREADY KNOWN."
I don't care, and neither does the Court. Canada already has precedent for press freedom but is also free of the absolute constraint that Mike takes for granted. We didn't flush away that which we never had in the first place. The judges were free to deal with the facts of the case without being forced either way, and were still careful to consider the costs. It does seem unlikely that this exact situation will arise again, so there is little to no threat to press freedoms.
That reporter was just looking for publicity and now his employer has a fat bill to pay for their failed experiment. That's no threat to press freedoms either, but one hopes it may at least slightly deter courtroom experimentation without first getting some good advice. ; ]
The source went off to join da'esh, and that's proven. The guy appears to be dead, though that's not yet proven.
The reporter, from a far-right propaganda outlet, is simply trying to make a martyr of himself against Canada; but it remains to be seen if he will go through with contempt or just take the publicity he's already generated and pin a medal on himself. ; ]
I heard that the Supreme Court was applying a set of safeguards that this reporter failed to meet. Does anybody see that list?
…shall die by the Law. These are the folks who are condemned for "casting stumbling blocks" before the sinners, thus actively fighting against the same God who is trying to save their souls.
The Bible [in the New Testament] calls them "antichrists" and warns Christians that "by their fruit [actions] shall ye know them."
On the post: Stupid Patent Of The Month: Veripath Patents Following Privacy Laws
D'oh!
I meant Venpath abandoned it! : P
On the post: Stupid Patent Of The Month: Veripath Patents Following Privacy Laws
The solution is easy, and probably why Venpath abandoned it…
…because switching to opt-out is obviously taboo here. ; ]
On the post: Stupid Patent Of The Month: Veripath Patents Following Privacy Laws
The solution is easy, and probably why Verizon abandoned it…
…because switching to opt-out is obviously taboo. ; ]
On the post: EU Commission Decides To Mock The Public; Insists Fears About EU Copyright Directive Are All Myths
Extortion plans lead to one offense…
…while extortionate plans lead to many more. ; ]
On the post: Article 13 Is Back On: Germany Caves To France As EU Pushes Forward On Ruining The Internet
Re: Re: Because
That rings a bell!
Isn't that the definition of fascism? ; ]
On the post: Cable's Response To Surging Streaming Competition? More Price Hikes
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If Musk...
satellite at a time, or that each city will be served by only a
handful of satellites at a time? SpaceX is already on the
record stating to the FCC that they will perform well enough
to compete with fiber and outpace cable. They're not in
the habit of lying like the terrestrial ISPs. Best acquaint
yourself with the available information, or are you
confessing to being an ISP publicist? ; ]
Also, don't forget that those satellites not otherwise occupied
will still be relaying the backhaul at unprecedented speeds
and at the full speed of light, unlike fiber which tops out
at about 0.66c, no matter how much data is moving.
On the post: Cable's Response To Surging Streaming Competition? More Price Hikes
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If Musk...
the ground and on each satellite will maintain multiple
connections at all times, all at 5G rates. The whole idea
is to be competitive with cable and fiber, using much newer
and more powerful technology than you assume all satellites
are hobbled by.
Read the Wikipedia page. Follow the links to the Ku and Ka
bands and the hardware too.
On the post: Cable's Response To Surging Streaming Competition? More Price Hikes
Re: Re: Re: Re: If Musk...
On the post: Cable's Response To Surging Streaming Competition? More Price Hikes
Re: Re: Re: If Musk...
means there will always be a lot more than a handful in view
at any time and connections will likely be 5G-like speeds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_%28satellite_constellation%29
On the post: Cable's Response To Surging Streaming Competition? More Price Hikes
Re: Re: If Musk...
It will have lots of satellites at 210 and 750 mile
orbits instead of just one at 22,236 miles.
On the post: Rep. Louie Gohmert Wants To Strip Section 230 Immunity From Social Media Platforms That Aren't 'Neutral'
Whether or not you have a physical presence…
Physical evasion does not negate laws or regulation.
Those DOING BUSINESS in any jurisdiction are subject
to it's laws and regulations, no matter their location.
The Dotcom case is an example where Biden caused U.S.
authorities to ignore normal legal processes which could have
worked and tried to make an experimental criminal precedent.
That created the quagmire which outlived Biden's VP career
and is likely to see him sued for costs once it collapses.
On the post: Rep. Louie Gohmert Wants To Strip Section 230 Immunity From Social Media Platforms That Aren't 'Neutral'
It's not as simple…
citizens and earning U.S. dollars from advertisers.
On the post: Copyright Industry Lobbyists Can't Even Get Their Story Straight On Article 13: Does It Expand Copyright Or Keep It The Same?
I see that Turkewitz is thinking of "property interests"…
Do you think that may explain why he's misunderstanding the whole issue? ; ]
On the post: AT&T Lets Users Avoid Broadband Caps...If They Use AT&T's Own Streaming Service
Re: Re: Re: broaden regulation
On the post: Why Is Congress Trying To Pass An Obviously Unconstitutional Bill That Would Criminalize Boycotts Of Israel?
Let's never forget…
…and not only did it work; we're all PROUD that it did. ; ]
On the post: Canada Rejects A Free Press: Supreme Court Says Journalist Must Hand Over Sources
Once is a critique…
I don't think this rates a proper lynching unless he
doubles down on the Canada-bashing. ; ]
On the post: Canada Rejects A Free Press: Supreme Court Says Journalist Must Hand Over Sources
Ah, right! Sometimes that catches me when it's late…
On the post: Canada Rejects A Free Press: Supreme Court Says Journalist Must Hand Over Sources
The Court mentioned both points I listed in their discussion
of the safeguards they apparently were thinking about.
Presumably, if the guy hadn't run off to be a "jihadi"
and was still alive today, that test of theirs may have
weighed more favourably to the appeal, so both points
are, in fact, central to the case as THEY saw it.
"Second - you'll note that already said it was bad form and didn't like it.
Third - my criticism of the case was in it's characterization. There was no forced disclosure of secret sources, because they were ALREADY KNOWN."
I don't care, and neither does the Court. Canada already has
precedent for press freedom but is also free of the absolute
constraint that Mike takes for granted. We didn't flush away
that which we never had in the first place. The judges were
free to deal with the facts of the case without being forced
either way, and were still careful to consider the costs.
It does seem unlikely that this exact situation will arise
again, so there is little to no threat to press freedoms.
That reporter was just looking for publicity and now his
employer has a fat bill to pay for their failed experiment.
That's no threat to press freedoms either, but one hopes it
may at least slightly deter courtroom experimentation without
first getting some good advice. ; ]
On the post: Canada Rejects A Free Press: Supreme Court Says Journalist Must Hand Over Sources
Two minor points affect this case this time:
The guy appears to be dead, though that's not yet proven.
The reporter, from a far-right propaganda outlet, is simply
trying to make a martyr of himself against Canada; but it
remains to be seen if he will go through with contempt or
just take the publicity he's already generated and pin a
medal on himself. ; ]
I heard that the Supreme Court was applying a set of safeguards
that this reporter failed to meet. Does anybody see that list?
On the post: Governor Of Tanzania's Capital Announces Plan To Round Up Everyone Who Was Too Gay On Social Media
"Christians" who attempt to live by the old Law…
for "casting stumbling blocks" before the sinners, thus actively
fighting against the same God who is trying to save their souls.
The Bible [in the New Testament] calls them "antichrists" and
warns Christians that "by their fruit [actions] shall ye know them."
Next >>