DEA as an accomplice to Blackmail and Embezzlement
Since the DEA illegally "stole" the money stolen from Bethany, this makes the DEA an accomplice to the blackmail by the couple and embezzlement by the blackmail victim.
Let's see these criminal DEA agents spend some time in prison for their crimes.
In the judicial branch, if a judge has "ties" to either side of the case, they must recuse themselves.
Shouldn't the same hold true in Congress? I mean hell, why is Congress the only entity where it's considered ethical for people to shift from business to office to business, not having to disclose those ties and being able to write / vote legislature related to those businesses?
I know, I know, I'm dreaming if I think we can stamp out the gross negligence that Congress has shown in mandating ethical (if not moral) conduct by their members.
Still, I can't believe someone hasn't filed some kind of class-action lawsuit against our Corporate Sponsored Congress Critters...
If the corporations pushing TPP for Corporate Sovereignty understand that if they get it, they no longer hold any copyrights or patents in the United States.
As sovereign entities, they can only own their embassies and the land the embassies sit on.
All patents and copyrights that they held prior to gaining sovereignty will immediately enter the public domain.
Force makers of sucralose admit that sugar alcohols have the exact same effect on blood sugar levels as regular sugar does.
If a company wants to reduce the "sugar" content, switch to all natural left chondrite sugar - aka Tagatose.
Left chondrite means left handed - ie - the sugar molecule is spun in a mirror image to normal right chondrite sugar.
The human body is not readily able to digest and process left chondrite sugar. Most bodies end up metabolising less than 15% of it, some less, some a bit more.
Overall, that reduces the sugar content without causing the body to react like it would to artificial sweeteners or sugar alcohols.
"Currently, the UCR program collects the number of justifiable homicides reported by police as well as information about the felonious killing and assault of law enforcement officers."
See - we're missing the "felonious killing and assault of victims by criminal law enforcement officers"
That most certainly explains the "missing data", they just assumed all officer shootings of children to be justifiable.
It wouldn't matter if the legislation went through anyway.
The "criminals" and "terrorists" would only use encryption designed, vetted and compiled outside of the United States or any NATO member nation.
Legislating a required backdoor would only damage the regular citizens, companies, corporations within the United States leaving them open to cyber attacks thousands of times a day.
By that line of thought, any attempt to legislate backdoors into encryption and other security products would be akin to mass vandalism to every device created or used within the United States. This would leave both the Legislative and Executive branches of the government open to Ricoh act charges because of the massive damage to our nations infrastructure.
I totally support this idea - with one major modification...
The terrorist / radical groups that need to be interred are the entire list of employees, management and operatives for the CIA, NSA, FBI, TSA, USAG, Executive Branch, Congressional Branch and Judicial Branch.
Once we've cleared the rifraf terrorist organizations listed above, we can get down to setting up a real government of the people, by the people and for the people, which our current Government since before 9/11 have forgotten about.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
Word games is all you played, you did not, because you cannot, show how broken / cracked / back-doored "encryption" can be considered as encryption any longer.
To be encryption, it must follow the following rules.
A) Secure from back-doors that break rules C and/or D B) Hasn't been hacked / cracked that break rules C and/or D. C) Nobody but the person who encrypted the file has the original encryption keys D) Nobody but the people that the originator wants to have the decryption keys have said decryption keys.
Re: Re: Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
I'm trying to figure out if you work for an alphabet agency or are just an apologist, but whichever the case may be, you're still just playing word games.
"effective encryption" ? pah - word games
"encryption with *government only* back-doors" - pah - word games.
Encryption isn't encryption unless it's;
A) Secure from back-doors B) Hasn't been hacked / cracked C) Nobody but the person who encrypted the file has the original encryption keys D) Nobody but the people that the originator wants to have the decryption keys have said decryption keys.
If any of these elements aren't true, then for all intents and purposes it may as well be plain text.
So play all your silly Alphabet Organization / Apologist word games you want, the rest of us in the real world know the truth.
Encryption is how we protect our Constitutional Rights
Poor Alphabet Government Agency...
I'm sorry, but the bill of rights doesn't stipulate limitations on our inalienable rights.
Let's go check.. hmmm, Bill of Rights, 4th amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
There are NO EXEMPTIONS to this right. That means that you don't get to clamor about how encryption is hurting investigations because of *GASP* terrorists .. extremists .. whateverists ..
The 4th amendment applies to EVERYONE. Get it? Got it? Get over yourselves!
Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
You can play word games all you want, but the net effect of backdooring encryption equates the end of encryption.
If you want an example, look at the DVD and BluRay encryption specs. Once details about the encryption leaked, it was broken. Updates to BluRay encryption typically last about 24 to 72 hours max.
Do you really think that once back doors were added that any other form of encryption would survive better than these 2 do?
Don't fool yourself. Backdoors to encryption = No encryption.
Quote: The problem is that some people falsely interpreted the original statements to mean that the UK wanted to ban encryption, rather than simply backdoor end-to-end encryption.
I'm sorry, but those that interpreted the original statements to mean that the UK wanted to ban encryption were correct.
Introducing a backdoor to any form of encryption, ends that encryption's ability to function properly.
Backdoors to encryption means no encryption, period.
European Union run by a bunch of mucousa munching morons.
Google has no control over how popular their search engine is. Google has no control over which web-sites choose to use Google's advertisement engine. Google has NO MONOPOLY whatsoever in anything.
Google has the largest percentage of search users because THE PEOPLE CHOSE TO USE GOOGLE the majority of the time.
Google has the highest number of websites using their advertisement engine because THE PEOPLE CHOSE TO USE GOOGLE the majority of the time.
EU Officials wake up, open your eyes and understand this plain and simple fact.
Your people CHOSE TO USE GOOGLE the majority of the time.
That is why they have the highest search and advertisement engine usage.
Get your heads out of your behinds and shape up.
If you need help with your head from behind removal, please let us know, we'd be happy to help.
Most of the public already holds Jim in contempt, let the judge also find him in contempt and disbar the two-toned zebra-headed, slime-coated, pimple-farmin' paramecium brain, munchin' on his own mucus, suffering from Google envy, that is Jim Hood. (Thank you for the quote Robin, RIP)
Re: Re: Time for Citizens arrest, let's show the cops how it's done.
If shackles are to be considered torture, then cops are torturing innocent people everyday.
In this case, we'll add torture to the list of charges on these so-called police officers, as they tortured a child.
The story tries to lessen the impact by calling him a teenager, but legally, anyone younger than 18 is still termed a child.
By the way, forcing them to wear shackles is for their own protection. That way no prisoner will ever be able to say that one of these criminal cops tried to start a fight while enjoying the sun in the general prison population.
What the other prisoners might do to these criminal cops, now that's another story entirely, but I do believe they'll learn to never hit another innocent bystander again.
On the post: DEA Seized $262k From Sexting Extortioners And Now The Oldest Private College In West Virginia Wants Its Money Back
DEA as an accomplice to Blackmail and Embezzlement
Let's see these criminal DEA agents spend some time in prison for their crimes.
On the post: Head Of House Judiciary Committee Dines With MPAA, Joins Their Fundraiser, Following LA Copyright Hearing
Why does Congress allow this?
Shouldn't the same hold true in Congress? I mean hell, why is Congress the only entity where it's considered ethical for people to shift from business to office to business, not having to disclose those ties and being able to write / vote legislature related to those businesses?
I know, I know, I'm dreaming if I think we can stamp out the gross negligence that Congress has shown in mandating ethical (if not moral) conduct by their members.
Still, I can't believe someone hasn't filed some kind of class-action lawsuit against our Corporate Sponsored Congress Critters...
On the post: The TPP And The Tobacco Carve-out Bring Together Strange Bedfellows... While Highlighting The Problems Of The TPP
Re: Re: I wonder if the corporations know this...
:)
On the post: The TPP And The Tobacco Carve-out Bring Together Strange Bedfellows... While Highlighting The Problems Of The TPP
Re: I wonder if the corporations know this...
Ah well, it's good to dream.
On the post: The TPP And The Tobacco Carve-out Bring Together Strange Bedfellows... While Highlighting The Problems Of The TPP
I wonder if the corporations know this...
As sovereign entities, they can only own their embassies and the land the embassies sit on.
All patents and copyrights that they held prior to gaining sovereignty will immediately enter the public domain.
Can't wait... :)
On the post: DailyDirt: How Sweet It Is?
Left Chondrite Sugar
Force makers of sucralose admit that sugar alcohols have the exact same effect on blood sugar levels as regular sugar does.
If a company wants to reduce the "sugar" content, switch to all natural left chondrite sugar - aka Tagatose.
Left chondrite means left handed - ie - the sugar molecule is spun in a mirror image to normal right chondrite sugar.
The human body is not readily able to digest and process left chondrite sugar. Most bodies end up metabolising less than 15% of it, some less, some a bit more.
Overall, that reduces the sugar content without causing the body to react like it would to artificial sweeteners or sugar alcohols.
On the post: FBI Director Says Agency Will Track Police-Involved Killings Better By Not Changing Any Of Its Current Methods
That explains the missing data...
See - we're missing the "felonious killing and assault of victims by criminal law enforcement officers"
That most certainly explains the "missing data", they just assumed all officer shootings of children to be justifiable.
On the post: Having Lost The Debate On Backdooring Encryption, Intelligence Community Plans To Wait Until Next Terrorist Attack
It wouldn't matter if the legislation went through anyway.
Legislating a required backdoor would only damage the regular citizens, companies, corporations within the United States leaving them open to cyber attacks thousands of times a day.
By that line of thought, any attempt to legislate backdoors into encryption and other security products would be akin to mass vandalism to every device created or used within the United States. This would leave both the Legislative and Executive branches of the government open to Ricoh act charges because of the massive damage to our nations infrastructure.
On the post: General Wesley Clark: Some WWII-Style Internment Camps Are Just The Thing We Need To Fight Domestic Radicalization
I totally support this idea - with one major modification...
Once we've cleared the rifraf terrorist organizations listed above, we can get down to setting up a real government of the people, by the people and for the people, which our current Government since before 9/11 have forgotten about.
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
To be encryption, it must follow the following rules.
A) Secure from back-doors that break rules C and/or D
B) Hasn't been hacked / cracked that break rules C and/or D.
C) Nobody but the person who encrypted the file has the original encryption keys
D) Nobody but the people that the originator wants to have the decryption keys have said decryption keys.
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
Broken encryption cannot be considered to be encryption any longer because it no longer performs the function that it was designed to do.
Backdoored encryption is broken encryption. Therefor backdoored encryption can no longer be considered as encryption.
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
Re: Re: Encryption is how we protect our Constitutional Rights
Sorry to have "hijacked" your story to infer what we Americans are dealing with at the same time.
However, I do believe the UK falls under Article 8 doesn't it? And doesn't Article 8 pretty much grant you the same rights as our Bill of Rights?
Right to privacy, et al.
https://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/human-rights/what-are-human-rights/human-rights-act/artic le-8-right-private-and-family-life
Essentially the same stuff, just worded and presented differently.
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
Re: Re: Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
"effective encryption" ? pah - word games
"encryption with *government only* back-doors" - pah - word games.
Encryption isn't encryption unless it's;
A) Secure from back-doors
B) Hasn't been hacked / cracked
C) Nobody but the person who encrypted the file has the original encryption keys
D) Nobody but the people that the originator wants to have the decryption keys have said decryption keys.
If any of these elements aren't true, then for all intents and purposes it may as well be plain text.
So play all your silly Alphabet Organization / Apologist word games you want, the rest of us in the real world know the truth.
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
Encryption is how we protect our Constitutional Rights
I'm sorry, but the bill of rights doesn't stipulate limitations on our inalienable rights.
Let's go check.. hmmm, Bill of Rights, 4th amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Scanning... Processing... Processing... Processing...
Ah-hah.. I was right...
There are NO EXEMPTIONS to this right.
That means that you don't get to clamor about how encryption is hurting investigations because of *GASP* terrorists .. extremists .. whateverists ..
The 4th amendment applies to EVERYONE. Get it? Got it? Get over yourselves!
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
Re: Re: Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
Just because you don't like that it proves my point, doesn't make it off-topic.
For another dead-on comparison, let's look at SSL v1.0, v2.0 and v3.0...
Each time, once the encryption was cracked, security blurbs went out telling people to stop using/trusting them.
Backdoored encryption = cracked encryption = no encryption.
I do thank you for proving my point though.
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
Re: Re: The original interpretation was correct...
If you want an example, look at the DVD and BluRay encryption specs. Once details about the encryption leaked, it was broken. Updates to BluRay encryption typically last about 24 to 72 hours max.
Do you really think that once back doors were added that any other form of encryption would survive better than these 2 do?
Don't fool yourself. Backdoors to encryption = No encryption.
On the post: UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
The original interpretation was correct...
I'm sorry, but those that interpreted the original statements to mean that the UK wanted to ban encryption were correct.
Introducing a backdoor to any form of encryption, ends that encryption's ability to function properly.
Backdoors to encryption means no encryption, period.
On the post: How Much Of Europe's Regulatory Interest In Silicon Valley Is Just Jealousy Over Successful Foreign Companies?
European Union run by a bunch of mucousa munching morons.
Google has no control over which web-sites choose to use Google's advertisement engine.
Google has NO MONOPOLY whatsoever in anything.
Google has the largest percentage of search users because THE PEOPLE CHOSE TO USE GOOGLE the majority of the time.
Google has the highest number of websites using their advertisement engine because THE PEOPLE CHOSE TO USE GOOGLE the majority of the time.
EU Officials wake up, open your eyes and understand this plain and simple fact.
Your people CHOSE TO USE GOOGLE the majority of the time.
That is why they have the highest search and advertisement engine usage.
Get your heads out of your behinds and shape up.
If you need help with your head from behind removal, please let us know, we'd be happy to help.
On the post: Judge Suggests Attorney General Jim Hood Is Unconstitutionally Threatening Google 'In Bad Faith'
Time to disbar Jim Hood
On the post: Judge Calls Out Portland Police For Bogus 'Contempt Of Cop' Arrest/Beating
Re: Re: Time for Citizens arrest, let's show the cops how it's done.
In this case, we'll add torture to the list of charges on these so-called police officers, as they tortured a child.
The story tries to lessen the impact by calling him a teenager, but legally, anyone younger than 18 is still termed a child.
By the way, forcing them to wear shackles is for their own protection. That way no prisoner will ever be able to say that one of these criminal cops tried to start a fight while enjoying the sun in the general prison population.
What the other prisoners might do to these criminal cops, now that's another story entirely, but I do believe they'll learn to never hit another innocent bystander again.
Next >>