ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 10 Nov 2017 @ 12:14pm
Re: The power corruption engine
The problem here though is no one came forward or even reported anything to police for months, in the current case before the courts, and decades for other cases. As much as you can claim someone is claiming an entitlement of the rich, it could also be said he is a target for grifters.
When a prosecutor said there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction 10 years ago and after a hung jury, the current prosecutor wants to keep pressing, this sounds more like persecution.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 10 Nov 2017 @ 8:34am
Re: Re:
While very true, that is increasingly unfeasible. Many organizations are, if not using cloud based operations, using off site servers shared by several sites.
Add in the push to make apps and programs cloud/server based will only further that.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 10 Nov 2017 @ 8:01am
Some consumer services just don't lend themselves to competition. Few municipalities would tolerate two or three sets of poles delivering electricity and/or phone service. Add in the capital required to wire an area, be it phone, electricity, cable or natural gas is very high. That leaves a very strong incentive to allow monopolies AND a layer of bureaucratic regulation to protect the consumer.
The consumer is a product. Those products return profits on the company's investment. If they didn't make a profit, they wouldn't be in business. However, there is that layer of bureaucratic regulation that prevents excessive profit while insisting on a minimum level of quality.
The problem with internet service is it has come along in an era of "regulating is bad". It has also removed the concept of regulating from a local area to be protected at a Federal level. Regulating content though is a new area that is waiting to be defined. One major problem here is trying to pigeonhole the internet into one nice easy package. Remember, your terrorist may be someone's mentor. And Rush Limbaugh is a terrorist.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 9 Nov 2017 @ 9:07am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You just touched on part of the problem.
The third party software was not always compatible with MS. WordPerfect would always be problematic when opening in MS Word. MS Word wouldn't open in WordPerfect.
Lotus 123 would not open in Word or the other way.
After the Antitrust case, MS did start allowing third parties to use source code. Today, I can use Open Office with very few issues going either way with Word.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 9 Nov 2017 @ 8:49am
Re: Re: No penalty for Boies
Yes, but, ...
The NYT is walking a fine line. If they go after Bois for having a conflict of interest, that may injure their relations with other contacts, including confidential informants. While I'm sure they may want to for vengeance sake, for a business sake, they won't.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 9 Nov 2017 @ 6:02am
Re: Re: No penalty for Boies
Yes, but, ...
The NYT is walking a fine line. If they go after Bois for having a conflict of interest, that may injure their relations with other contacts, including confidential informants. While I'm sure they may want to for vengeance sake, for a business sake, they won't.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 9 Nov 2017 @ 5:48am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Consumer Confusioning
I agree. Netflix is looking long term at the PR this establishment gives the show. The name does not injure Netflix or their show in any way as the network makes their money off of subscribers, not ad revenue. Anything that brings them subscribers is a good thing.
At some point though, I'm sure that even Netflix will want to cash in on its properties, as they have every right to. Then, they may license their IP to whomever wants to use it.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 9 Nov 2017 @ 5:30am
Re: A criminal Has
I don't think they have been criminally charged. They have been fired for cause which is a much different animal.
I'll leave it to the Prosecutor to decide if a crime exists. Yes, their actions rise to a severe violation of city policy, but I'm not so sure it is a crime. (If there was further vandalism, such as damage to a car or painting racist graffiti on his personal belongings then this would be evidence of a continuing crime. But not on its own.) see Virginia v. Black, 2003 where the SC decided that actual intimidation must be shown.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 9 Nov 2017 @ 5:18am
Re: Re:
Something like this is most likely unconstitutional. If it is fine to have the Fire Chief, Police Chief, City Manager, etc. photos released, there is no reason not to allow the photos of ordinary fire fighters and police. These women and men are being paid with government funds. It is discriminatory to allow the release of some government photos but not others based solely on general qualifications.
Yes, an exception could be made in special circumstances, such as if they were working undercover or in a contract role.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 9 Nov 2017 @ 4:37am
Re: Names of animals or people
Yes, since my last name is Johnson and our kids are named Steven and Joan, why can't I start a company called SJ Johnson after my kids? Or even Johnson and Johnson?
NOTE: My cousin already named his lumber and supply business Billie Joe Johnson and Son, LLC. Apparently there is a difference between selling wood and the stuff that gives you a woodie.
ralph_the_bus_driver (profile), 31 Oct 2017 @ 7:30pm
Re:
Not quite. Fair Use allows someone to use other's work for personal or informational use. What Fair Use doesn't do is allow you to profit off of other's work.
A site can use a picture of Peyton Manning to illustrate a news story. If that photo is the subject (instead of an illustration) then they will need to pay for the use.
On the post: Lawsuit Brought By Cosby Show Production Company Against Documentary Is The Reason We Have Fair Use
Re: The power corruption engine
When a prosecutor said there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction 10 years ago and after a hung jury, the current prosecutor wants to keep pressing, this sounds more like persecution.
On the post: Logitech Once Again Shows That In The Modern Era, You Don't Really Own What You Buy
Re:
On the post: Logitech Once Again Shows That In The Modern Era, You Don't Really Own What You Buy
Re: Re:
Add in the push to make apps and programs cloud/server based will only further that.
And that sucks.
On the post: Recent Intel Chipsets Have A Built-In Hidden Computer, Running Minix With A Networking Stack And A Web Server
Re:
On the post: Dear Al Franken: Net Neutrality Is Not A Magic Wand You Can Wave At Any Company
The consumer is a product. Those products return profits on the company's investment. If they didn't make a profit, they wouldn't be in business. However, there is that layer of bureaucratic regulation that prevents excessive profit while insisting on a minimum level of quality.
The problem with internet service is it has come along in an era of "regulating is bad". It has also removed the concept of regulating from a local area to be protected at a Federal level. Regulating content though is a new area that is waiting to be defined. One major problem here is trying to pigeonhole the internet into one nice easy package. Remember, your terrorist may be someone's mentor. And Rush Limbaugh is a terrorist.
On the post: Village Hotels Bullies Small Pub Into Changing Its Name By Brandishing Its 'Village' Trademark
Re: Re:
The pub would be smart to contact their local MP and have the Village Hotels registration checked for being too broad.
On the post: Taylor Swift Using Dubious Trademark Registrations To Shut Down Sales Of Fan-Made Goods
On the post: Miami City Attorney Tries To Erase Photos Of Fired Firefighters From The Internet
Re: Re: Re: It's been 12 years...
On the post: Colorado Voters Shoot Down Comcast's Shitty, Protectionist State Broadband Law
Re: the sad part
On the post: Colorado Voters Shoot Down Comcast's Shitty, Protectionist State Broadband Law
Re: Just wait until Google Fibber hits town!
I can complain to my local politician about the government service. The private business doesn't care if I complain.
On the post: David Boies Accused Of Running Horrifying Spy Operation Against Harvey Weinstein's Accusers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The third party software was not always compatible with MS. WordPerfect would always be problematic when opening in MS Word. MS Word wouldn't open in WordPerfect.
Lotus 123 would not open in Word or the other way.
After the Antitrust case, MS did start allowing third parties to use source code. Today, I can use Open Office with very few issues going either way with Word.
On the post: David Boies Accused Of Running Horrifying Spy Operation Against Harvey Weinstein's Accusers
Re: Re: No penalty for Boies
The NYT is walking a fine line. If they go after Bois for having a conflict of interest, that may injure their relations with other contacts, including confidential informants. While I'm sure they may want to for vengeance sake, for a business sake, they won't.
On the post: David Boies Accused Of Running Horrifying Spy Operation Against Harvey Weinstein's Accusers
Re: Re: No penalty for Boies
The NYT is walking a fine line. If they go after Bois for having a conflict of interest, that may injure their relations with other contacts, including confidential informants. While I'm sure they may want to for vengeance sake, for a business sake, they won't.
On the post: David Boies Accused Of Running Horrifying Spy Operation Against Harvey Weinstein's Accusers
Re:
His ethics are questionable. His conflict of interest is inexcusable.
On the post: What Netflix's Congenial Trademark 'Threat Letter' Says About Everyone's Tolerance For Trademark Bullying
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Consumer Confusioning
At some point though, I'm sure that even Netflix will want to cash in on its properties, as they have every right to. Then, they may license their IP to whomever wants to use it.
On the post: Miami City Attorney Tries To Erase Photos Of Fired Firefighters From The Internet
Re: A criminal Has
I'll leave it to the Prosecutor to decide if a crime exists. Yes, their actions rise to a severe violation of city policy, but I'm not so sure it is a crime. (If there was further vandalism, such as damage to a car or painting racist graffiti on his personal belongings then this would be evidence of a continuing crime. But not on its own.) see Virginia v. Black, 2003 where the SC decided that actual intimidation must be shown.
On the post: Miami City Attorney Tries To Erase Photos Of Fired Firefighters From The Internet
Re: Re:
Yes, an exception could be made in special circumstances, such as if they were working undercover or in a contract role.
On the post: Moosehead Still At It: Sues Hop 'N Moose Brewing For Trademark Infringement
Re: Names of animals or people
NOTE: My cousin already named his lumber and supply business Billie Joe Johnson and Son, LLC. Apparently there is a difference between selling wood and the stuff that gives you a woodie.
On the post: Man Gets $37,500 Payout After Field Drug Test Says Donut Crumbs Are Methamphetamines
Re:
Breathalyzers can do a good job of measuring the relative blood/alcohol levels.
On the post: Marketing Guy: Google Image Search Is A Honeypot Set Up By Aggressive Copyright Litigants
Re:
A site can use a picture of Peyton Manning to illustrate a news story. If that photo is the subject (instead of an illustration) then they will need to pay for the use.
Next >>