Dad: “Honey, the cable’s on the fritz again!”
Mom: ‘cuts the tv cord’
Dad: “It’s still on the fritz!”
Son: “They didn’t mean to cut the cord literally”
No that’s not what I meant. That whole section about my soccerball-to-the-nuts experience was just a silly story that spawned from reading Cdaragorn’s explanation of Section 230. Because I was joking when I had said previously: Unfortunately it doesn’t protect me from a full-force soccer ball bullseye to the nuts during a soccer game
Yeah, I suck at trying to find something funny to say.
It's a law that basically just says if someone says something online that could be deemed illegal, you are not allowed to punish the site they posted their speech on or anyone else who wasn't directly involved in actually making the statement. You have to punish the person that broke the law.
So This basically prevents the site from being caught in the crossfire? Interesting.
Unfortunately it doesn’t protect me from a full-force soccer ball bullseye to the nuts during a soccer game which occurred during high school because the other person couldn’t kick it anywhere else.
Trust me, Cdaragorn, my high school years are a novel in itself.
FYI: I Misread The Topic Title And Had The Wrong Idea
It took me a while to realize you were talking about the NSA.
This whole time I thought it said NASA. I guess I keep getting them confused too often. It’s a thing that happens to me way too often and it sucks!
It’s like those posts I find where I have to go back up and reread it because the post said that I read the first one wrong, and then it happens to me twice in a row like a “Double Whammy”.
I guess I learned a lesson from this: ”Never Let Your Eyes Read Faster Than Your Brain”
BTW, I almost misspelled Section 230 on accident. I almost typed it as Sextion 230. I apologize
Can anyone explain to me what this “Section 230” is all about without trying to cause my brain to feel like it’s on acid (even though I never took Acid and I never want to take Acid because it sounds weird) because I need to hear it from a neutral point of view to be able to understand this.
This whole thread is an absolute mindfuck to the brain. I don’t know who to believe in this case. The evidence presented on both sides is bouncing off each other like two pairs of Magikarp flopping off of each other in a creepy mating session that turns out to not be mating at all. Gosh, I’m gonna do what a typical normal person would do: SLEEP
I’m probably gonna need more coffee and sugar to even comprehend the so-called “logical way” of thinking when it comes to trademarks. Unless they start going after “As Tasted On TV”
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Nope! Here’s the actual answer:
Claps for days! Here’s your Nobel Clever Comment Prize!
On the post: Facebook's 'Please Regulate Us' Tour Heads To France
The Worst Concert with a Hint of Copyright
Get your tickets to the live show in France now and we’ll throw in a free Copyright strike free of charge.
Oh wait! They aren’t free, stupid.
On the post: 1.28 Million US Residents Cut The TV Cord Last Quarter
Dad: “Honey, the cable’s on the fritz again!”
Mom: ‘cuts the tv cord’
Dad: “It’s still on the fritz!”
Son: “They didn’t mean to cut the cord literally”
On the post: It's One Thing For Trolls And Grandstanding Politicians To Get CDA 230 Wrong, But The Press Shouldn't Help Them
Re: Re: Re: Re: ...Section 230...
That’s a fact. You never know what monstrosity will be created.
On the post: The Pai FCC Sits On Its Hands While Phone Companies Rip Off American Taxpayers
Re: Re: ...
You just put “All Star by Smash Mouth” stuck in my head.
On the post: The Pai FCC Sits On Its Hands While Phone Companies Rip Off American Taxpayers
Re:
Sometimes the art of comedy is to catch the reader off guard by painting a weird image in their heads.
But still, thank you.
On the post: EU Quietly Ramps Up Preparations To Re-introduce Blanket Data Retention After Top Court Threw It Out In 2014
EU, this is Not Metal Gear Solid
This is not the time to be hiding in a box while sneaking these corrupt laws into people’s faces.
On the post: The Pai FCC Sits On Its Hands While Phone Companies Rip Off American Taxpayers
...
Sitting on its hands?
It more feels like the Pai FCC’s t-bagging us American taxpayers.
On the post: Chinese Spies Intercepted NSA Malware Attack, Weaponized It Against Targets Around The World
Re: Re: FYI: I Misread The Topic Title And Had The Wrong Idea
Lol it’s also what happens when I’m tired even when I get more than enough sleep.
On the post: US Bandwidth Consumption Surges As Usage Caps Pose A Looming Threat
History Repeats Itself
April 18, 1775: ”The British Are Coming”
May 8, 2019: The Usage Caps Are Coming”
...
No? Not even a peep?
K. I’ll see myself out.
On the post: It's One Thing For Trolls And Grandstanding Politicians To Get CDA 230 Wrong, But The Press Shouldn't Help Them
Re: Re: ...Section 230...
Baldi says: Now it’s time for everybody’s favorite subject. MATH
6.3 x 2 = 12.6
pH 12.6 is the acidic level of bleach.
Conclusion: You drink a half a cup of bleach a day?
...
(I’ll see myself out)
On the post: It's One Thing For Trolls And Grandstanding Politicians To Get CDA 230 Wrong, But The Press Shouldn't Help Them
Re: Re: Re: Re: ...Section 230...
So...internet forums are like soccer
No that’s not what I meant. That whole section about my soccerball-to-the-nuts experience was just a silly story that spawned from reading Cdaragorn’s explanation of Section 230. Because I was joking when I had said previously:
Unfortunately it doesn’t protect me from a full-force soccer ball bullseye to the nuts during a soccer game
Yeah, I suck at trying to find something funny to say.
On the post: Chinese Spies Intercepted NSA Malware Attack, Weaponized It Against Targets Around The World
Re: Cyberwar
It’s a whole different ball game than your typical Call of Duty game.
On the post: It's One Thing For Trolls And Grandstanding Politicians To Get CDA 230 Wrong, But The Press Shouldn't Help Them
Re: Re: ...Section 230...
It's a law that basically just says if someone says something online that could be deemed illegal, you are not allowed to punish the site they posted their speech on or anyone else who wasn't directly involved in actually making the statement. You have to punish the person that broke the law.
So This basically prevents the site from being caught in the crossfire? Interesting.
Unfortunately it doesn’t protect me from a full-force soccer ball bullseye to the nuts during a soccer game which occurred during high school because the other person couldn’t kick it anywhere else.
Trust me, Cdaragorn, my high school years are a novel in itself.
On the post: Chinese Spies Intercepted NSA Malware Attack, Weaponized It Against Targets Around The World
FYI: I Misread The Topic Title And Had The Wrong Idea
It took me a while to realize you were talking about the NSA.
This whole time I thought it said NASA. I guess I keep getting them confused too often. It’s a thing that happens to me way too often and it sucks!
It’s like those posts I find where I have to go back up and reread it because the post said that I read the first one wrong, and then it happens to me twice in a row like a “Double Whammy”.
I guess I learned a lesson from this: ”Never Let Your Eyes Read Faster Than Your Brain”
On the post: It's One Thing For Trolls And Grandstanding Politicians To Get CDA 230 Wrong, But The Press Shouldn't Help Them
...Section 230...
BTW, I almost misspelled Section 230 on accident. I almost typed it as Sextion 230. I apologize
Can anyone explain to me what this “Section 230” is all about without trying to cause my brain to feel like it’s on acid (even though I never took Acid and I never want to take Acid because it sounds weird) because I need to hear it from a neutral point of view to be able to understand this.
On the post: The Ninth Circuit Broke The Internet. So We Asked Them To Unbreak It.
Re:
This whole thread is an absolute mindfuck to the brain. I don’t know who to believe in this case. The evidence presented on both sides is bouncing off each other like two pairs of Magikarp flopping off of each other in a creepy mating session that turns out to not be mating at all. Gosh, I’m gonna do what a typical normal person would do:
SLEEP
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: 'minor shred' implies a higher than zero amount
Huh... no wonder science can’t prove how credible his words are.
Einstein sure can’t figure him out, either.
On the post: UMG Fails To Get Trademark For 'As Heard On TV' In A Remarkably Sane Ruling From The TTAB
Re:
Something tells me you’re right.
On the post: UMG Fails To Get Trademark For 'As Heard On TV' In A Remarkably Sane Ruling From The TTAB
I’m probably gonna need more coffee and sugar to even comprehend the so-called “logical way” of thinking when it comes to trademarks. Unless they start going after “As Tasted On TV”
Next >>