And Gunther Russbacher. They wiped his mind because he flew Bush to Paris for "The October Surpise." If you ever had any doubt whether they could actually do that, the answer is Gunther Russbacher. I know you guys don't know anything, but I would recommend you start studying now. I'd start in the mid-1800s to discover the forces behind our current world. But then, if you skip "The Ancients," you won't know anything. Of particular importance are: (1) Pythagoras, (2) Plato ... going into the middle ages (3) Dante, (4) Paracelsus ... hitting the renaissance (5) Christian Rosencreutz ... (6) study Jewish racism in Russia in the mid-1850s, and the Catholic response thereto ... (7) Edward Bulwer Lytton in England in the same time period, (8)of course Newton, (9) of course everything in the modern age was because of Darwin, and (10) you can't miss out on the Jewish Nazis.
Don't you think it would be a really good thing, considering the state of the Internet right now, especially as illustrated by this event, if some rules were made about cyberbullying and mob incitement so that you or your friends and loved ones, and fellow citizens don't ever have to experience an attack like this? I'm telling you, it has been intense! Things are out of control on the Internet. The FBI is riling kids up, making them hack and "occupy," so they can crack a few heads. It's so much funner that way, for them, you know. Otherwise life is a little boring. You got to get into sophisticated sadism to understand their game: They make friends with you, and then stab you in the back. I'm kind of an afficionado of the CIA, myself, and study them intensely. One Delta Force leader said, "They'll have you crawl way out on a limb and then saw off the branch." They love to f*ck their own people. I mean, just look at what they did to Dr. Olson! They threw him out a freakin' window!
I seriously hope your whole life goes well, and that no problem ever besets you, but if one does, I seriously hope you will never be able to afford a lawyer.
I see you have a problem with cause and effect. I know it's difficult, a challenge for any of us, but sometimes you just have to say, "It's King George's fault," and have a revolution.
Well, aren't you happy? Consider yourself part of the conspiracy to hurt an innocent person. Maybe you should start a Marquis de Sade club, and sign everyone here up.
Who would believe that all of a sudden, idiots on the Internet would start attacking a lawyer for serving a 3-page letter asking someone to take down a hate page based on the completely wrong opinion that they are thieves if someone posts a picture on their site. Then Matthew Inman makes thieves everywhere he goes when he posts his own pictures on the Internet. Kind of like Monsanto, who will grind you into the ground if their seed gets into your field. Do you control the freaking wind? The insects, the bugs, the animals who shit their seed out in your field? Hey, all of us good girls know whose side YOU'RE on!
Re: Not a question of which side of the line this is on
Really, you guys are amazing! You don't know anything, but you just talk and talk and talk. Is that a guy thing? You gotta look tough all the time? To give yourself the energy to make a living and maybe support your family? I remember reading some super-fascist once -- I can't remember who -- I read a lot of that kind of thing -- and he said that no one has the right to criticize a man in action! Ha ha ha ha ha. Did you know there is a cult of "action"? It's a fascinating topic! It's all about whether we are going to be "actors" or "thinkers." IT's deep, deep philosophy.
It's so funny to criticize a laywer for what he does. I'll bet you this: If YOU were in FunnyJunk's position, I bet you would want to hire CHARLES CARREON!
But we wouldn't want to doubt for one second the testimony of our so-called "friends." You know, you can actually learn to tell who a person really is if you study philosophy. Then you can read their language, and categorize it appropriately, and know if they're working for the FBI. Their real views sneak out when they're not paying attention. Not that Matthew Inman is hiding anything. I mean, he's putting people into woodchippers, and showing you the bloody mess that comes out the other end. He's right out there, but because people don't know philosophy, they don't seem to recognize that he's a sadist.
Matt Inman talks about a lot of cartoonists he emulates, but he's no Gary Larson! He reminds me more than anything of Al Capp, and I'm pretty sure he was part of the conspiracy to kill John Lennon. He came to him and Yoko just before he died, and ridiculed the hell out of him. Got a big kick out of it, he did.
Like I was REALLY surprised when I found out that Arthur Lovell, who wrote "Ars Vivendi," which is a "vril" classic, as in "The Vril Society," as in Adolph Hitler, that he is related to James "Jim" Arthur Lovell, Jr., the NASA astronaut of Apollo 13. So often, the famous people who are put before our eyes in society are children of "intelligence" agents. And while you think you're cozying up with one of the underdogs, he's actually an elite in disguise.
Is that a pun, "beacon of intelligence"? You know, like Timothy Leary wrote "The Intelligence Agents"? "Intelligence" has at least two distinctly different meanings. And at least one of them goes backwards on itself, like an ourorbos. Like Jung and all the other freemasons said, "You got ta reconcile those opposites!" Which is why the OSS's motto was "To reason is treason."
If there are any "intelligent" people here, do you think you could get to work finding out if Matthew Robert Inman is related to Bobby Ray Inman? Perhaps he's a grandson. The Net has been thoroughly scrubbed of any personal information on Matthew, and that's such a sign, ya know? When you can't find anyone from his past talking about their childhood, or something that happened when they went to high school, and no parents, or brothers and sisters. And -- I mean, I don't want to jump to conclusions -- but they look almost exactly alike! It could be a coincidence, but it would be really nice to know one way or the other. Couldn't one of you hack Bobby Ray Inman's personal computer -- I DIDN'T SAY THAT! -- and find out the truth for us? It could make the world of difference!
Really, you amaze me, LOL! What do you know about the law, exactly? Have you read Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, taken down one of the biggest organizations in the world, i.e., NSI?
Re: Re: Re: Finally, we'll answer the old question
You think you can just tell a lawyer to stop doing his job? What kind of madness has seized you? You think you can say "Boo!" and make the law go away? I think you've been in virtual reality for way too long. Word: There's a real world out there. Go smell the flowers.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Finally, we'll answer the old question
And, oh! ... That business called the "Internet." Ditto the same argument for that. It doesn't actually exist. Only persons with responsibility for their actions. You think you won't get caught? But you'll catch yourselves. Just like a soldier who sticks a gun to his head because he killed someone.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Finally, we'll answer the old question
You know, painting everyone with the same brush is the philosophical basis of racism. Those big group names don't actually exist as living, breathing entities. They are just concepts in your mind. In every country, every religion, every profession, there are individuals, each unique and deserving of human rights. There is not a better lawyer in the world than Charles Carreon. He is the smartest person I know. And I'm a fan of such illustrious persons as Thomas Paine, and Ralph Nader. So that's really saying something.
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re:
And don't forget Jung. He had foreknowledge of World War I. That means "conspiracy" kids. Jung was one of the very, very bad guys.
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Lawyers, eh?
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Even if the "security attacks" are real . . .
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Ow... Ow... Ow...
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Dumb and Dumber has a new sequel!
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Not a question of which side of the line this is on
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Not a question of which side of the line this is on
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Matt Inman talks about a lot of cartoonists he emulates, but he's no Gary Larson! He reminds me more than anything of Al Capp, and I'm pretty sure he was part of the conspiracy to kill John Lennon. He came to him and Yoko just before he died, and ridiculed the hell out of him. Got a big kick out of it, he did.
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re:
If there are any "intelligent" people here, do you think you could get to work finding out if Matthew Robert Inman is related to Bobby Ray Inman? Perhaps he's a grandson. The Net has been thoroughly scrubbed of any personal information on Matthew, and that's such a sign, ya know? When you can't find anyone from his past talking about their childhood, or something that happened when they went to high school, and no parents, or brothers and sisters. And -- I mean, I don't want to jump to conclusions -- but they look almost exactly alike! It could be a coincidence, but it would be really nice to know one way or the other. Couldn't one of you hack Bobby Ray Inman's personal computer -- I DIDN'T SAY THAT! -- and find out the truth for us? It could make the world of difference!
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re: Finally, we'll answer the old question
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Finally, we'll answer the old question
On the post: Funnyjunk's Lawyer, Charles Carreon, Continues To Lash Out: Accuses Matt Inman Of 'Instigating Security Attacks'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Finally, we'll answer the old question
Next >>