We did that. Yay. Unfortunately, it sent his approval rating up, and now fewer people support impeachment now then before it started. The clueless morons are getting him reelected with their fake nonsense. Again.
Again, I know what's going on because I read up. The Ohr connection is pretty damning. The DNC literally paying for the fake dossier should be enough, and is for anyone unbiased.
This makes sense to me. It's like the old telecom tradition of lying to customers about outages so they don't have to pay fees associated with breaking their SLA. Telecoms got so used to lying to people, they'd do it when they didn't even have to lie. It just became standard practice.
They literally lied about paying for the fake dossier they had the FBI pretend was real, and the FBI literally lied about the DNC paying for it, despite knowing they did. They knew they'd never get their FISA applications approved without lying about the disposition of the fake DNC dossier. Come on.
I just did it this time. Me knowing is enough for me. The real mind bender now is waking up and realizing it was all just a con from the DNC and FBI, with help from the news media. It's realizing you live in that world, where both sides are badguys.
They fabricated evidence. Yeah, he's going to sue and he's going to win. They ruined his life. Manafort is still screwed, but Flynn will walk now, and Papadop will get his record wiped, and he'll likely also sue and win now.
It's like all the people that said it was fake were right this whole time. Nuts. Now all those people convicted will walk free, or get their records expunged. Oh, and it looks like Carter Page is going to sue the heck out of the FBI, and win.
1) Do I placate the wishes of a tiny fraction of my users, and change the entire world for them?
or
2) Do I identify the handful of overly sensitive people and hide the world from them?
I'm really leaning towards two now. Imagine how much better twitter would be.
I'm going to have to spend some time processing this one.
On the face of it... I mean, the folks that are overly sensitive make up a very tiny portion of any social network. Is it right to give that tiny fringe minority cancelling power? Doesn't it make more sense to protect those sensitive people by shielding them from the real world? Wouldn't that be about ten times easier?
It still feels like I'm missing something about how elegant that all seems, and much easier than doing the opposite.
Do you mean like illegally spying on a presidential candidate with the FBI by using forged documents? That happened much more recently. We should probably deal with the FBI's illegal harassment of an American citizen for political reasons before we hop in a time machine to attack someone.
What's normal procedure when a company tells provable lies about you repeatedly? How are you supposed to react to that? He has proof they told lies. What should he do?
On the post: DOJ Headed By William Barr Asked To Explain Warrantless Bulk Data Collection William Barr Authorized 27 Years Ago When He Was The Head Of The DOJ
Re: Where have you been the last seven years?
You are projecting. You are under some illusion I like trump. I won't even capitalize his name.
On the post: DOJ Headed By William Barr Asked To Explain Warrantless Bulk Data Collection William Barr Authorized 27 Years Ago When He Was The Head Of The DOJ
Re: Re: Potentially illegal surveillance program?
What a difference a day makes eh? Sorry I was right.
On the post: DOJ Headed By William Barr Asked To Explain Warrantless Bulk Data Collection William Barr Authorized 27 Years Ago When He Was The Head Of The DOJ
Re:
We did that. Yay. Unfortunately, it sent his approval rating up, and now fewer people support impeachment now then before it started. The clueless morons are getting him reelected with their fake nonsense. Again.
On the post: Inspector General's Report On Investigation Of Trump Campaign Finds More FISA-Related Abuse By The FBI
Re:
Again, I know what's going on because I read up. The Ohr connection is pretty damning. The DNC literally paying for the fake dossier should be enough, and is for anyone unbiased.
On the post: Inspector General's Report On Investigation Of Trump Campaign Finds More FISA-Related Abuse By The FBI
Re:
This makes sense to me. It's like the old telecom tradition of lying to customers about outages so they don't have to pay fees associated with breaking their SLA. Telecoms got so used to lying to people, they'd do it when they didn't even have to lie. It just became standard practice.
On the post: Inspector General's Report On Investigation Of Trump Campaign Finds More FISA-Related Abuse By The FBI
Re:
They literally lied about paying for the fake dossier they had the FBI pretend was real, and the FBI literally lied about the DNC paying for it, despite knowing they did. They knew they'd never get their FISA applications approved without lying about the disposition of the fake DNC dossier. Come on.
On the post: Inspector General's Report On Investigation Of Trump Campaign Finds More FISA-Related Abuse By The FBI
Re:
I just did it this time. Me knowing is enough for me. The real mind bender now is waking up and realizing it was all just a con from the DNC and FBI, with help from the news media. It's realizing you live in that world, where both sides are badguys.
On the post: Inspector General's Report On Investigation Of Trump Campaign Finds More FISA-Related Abuse By The FBI
Re: Re: Re: Re: Amazing
Manafort is still screwed. He was corrupt before trump, when he was working for the Clintons and Podestas.
On the post: Inspector General's Report On Investigation Of Trump Campaign Finds More FISA-Related Abuse By The FBI
Re: Re: Amazing
They fabricated evidence. Yeah, he's going to sue and he's going to win. They ruined his life. Manafort is still screwed, but Flynn will walk now, and Papadop will get his record wiped, and he'll likely also sue and win now.
On the post: Inspector General's Report On Investigation Of Trump Campaign Finds More FISA-Related Abuse By The FBI
Amazing
It's like all the people that said it was fake were right this whole time. Nuts. Now all those people convicted will walk free, or get their records expunged. Oh, and it looks like Carter Page is going to sue the heck out of the FBI, and win.
On the post: Teespring Takes Down Our Copying Is Not Theft Gear, Refuses To Say Why
I'll be watching this one closely
About half my closet is teespring. Would be a shame to have to stop buying from them.
On the post: Be Careful What You Wish For: TikTok Tries To Stop Bullying On Its Platforms... By Suppressing Those It Thought Might Get Bullied
Distilled, it comes down to this:
1) Do I placate the wishes of a tiny fraction of my users, and change the entire world for them?
or
2) Do I identify the handful of overly sensitive people and hide the world from them?
I'm really leaning towards two now. Imagine how much better twitter would be.
On the post: Be Careful What You Wish For: TikTok Tries To Stop Bullying On Its Platforms... By Suppressing Those It Thought Might Get Bullied
I'm going to have to spend some time processing this one.
On the face of it... I mean, the folks that are overly sensitive make up a very tiny portion of any social network. Is it right to give that tiny fringe minority cancelling power? Doesn't it make more sense to protect those sensitive people by shielding them from the real world? Wouldn't that be about ten times easier?
It still feels like I'm missing something about how elegant that all seems, and much easier than doing the opposite.
On the post: DOJ Headed By William Barr Asked To Explain Warrantless Bulk Data Collection William Barr Authorized 27 Years Ago When He Was The Head Of The DOJ
Potentially illegal surveillance program?
Do you mean like illegally spying on a presidential candidate with the FBI by using forged documents? That happened much more recently. We should probably deal with the FBI's illegal harassment of an American citizen for political reasons before we hop in a time machine to attack someone.
On the post: The Subtweet Defense Wins: Elon Musk Cleared In Defamation Case
I just felt a disturbance in the farce
As if a thousand childish haters and braindead shorters cried out in childish jealous and were suddenly louder.
On the post: Attorney General To Law Enforcement Critics: Good Luck Getting A Cop When You Need One
"There are a few ways to read the AG's comments."
Gosh, I wonder which one this site will pick?
On the post: Facebook Now Altering Users' Posts To Add Singapore Government's 'Fake News' Warnings
They are so dumb
Why make laws when google and twitter will do it for you and call it content moderation?
On the post: Devin Nunes Follows Through And Sues CNN In Laughably Dumb SLAPP Suit
Re: Re: What's normal procedure...
So he should sue CNN then. Thanks.
On the post: Devin Nunes Follows Through And Sues CNN In Laughably Dumb SLAPP Suit
What's normal procedure...
What's normal procedure when a company tells provable lies about you repeatedly? How are you supposed to react to that? He has proof they told lies. What should he do?
On the post: Study Says Russian Trolls Didn't Have Much Influence On Election; But It's More Complicated Than That
The important thing
is to continue to shame people pushing fake russian conspiracy theories at this point, when we know the Media made most of it up whole cloth.
Next >>