About that brain bleach... where can I get some, please.
I must not read the hidden comments, they're hidden for a reason.
I must... why was this one hidden by the community?
I must not read the hidden comments, they're hidden for a reason.
Honestly, the more someone virtue signals over their religion, the more suspicious of them I become. I rarely talk about my religion, but when I do, it's never been to portray myself as a trustworthy, good moral person. I let my conduct do the talking where self-portrayal is concerned.
As I've said before, wolves like to dress in sheep's clothing to make themselves look less wolfy. But no matter how much wool they wear, they're still predators.
That red button at the end of the coloured bar at the top of every post is called the "Report" button.
Okay? This is important because the point of the button is to record the fact that we don't like your post. It doesn't belong here. We don't want to see it. Therefore we click it to report your post as undesirable.
I understand that if at least five people click that button, your post is hidden behind a grey line of text that indicates it is there. This line explicitly says, "This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it."
It's the community, i.e. the readers like myself, who click the button. We hid your troll posts, okay? Now stop whining about it and push off.
Communism fails because it's ultimately anarchist and doesn't take actual human nature into account. Result: power vacuum filled by paranoid authoritarian regime that tries to impose the unrealistic goals of the ideology on the people. This is where the violence, cruelty, and repression come from: it's to force people to make their ideological fantasies come true.
The same can be said of any philosophy requiring wishful thinking and suspension of disbelief among its adherents. I'm looking at you, Boris Johnson.
It's the assumption that's the problem as evidenced by the state of capitalism today. Were the notion of the playing field being level actually true, we wouldn't be seeing the ridiculous disparity in incomes between those who do the actual work and their massively overpaid CEOs.
Particularly when they tell you that you're worth what the (rigged) market says you're worth. This is why I mock the big "L" libertarians. They want us to pretend that the market is a fair and balanced, and therefore the best and most efficient system for distribution of wealth and resources. No, it's not. If that were trued we'd have no homeless people.
Because the market is not some kind of gestalt entity with a will and a mind of its own. What you're suggesting is basically populism, ceding the internet to the lowest common denominator. I for one am not in favour of allowing the entire thing to turn into 8chan.
Ah, I got my information from Britain's Labour party, which is led by one Mr. Jeremy Corbyn, who has been repeatedly categorised as a dangerous lefty socialist-type thingy by the right wing press here in the UK.
Racism is very much alive in these circles, and tends to go along the lines of, "I suppose I ought to paint myself black, then see if there's any social housing, etc., available." The Other is always presented as "Front of the line for taking things meant for ourselves." That's what I mean by "protectionist" in that context. Right-wingers' protectionism tends to go along the lines of "They're intent on replacing de white folks!"
By "collectivism" I meant unionisation and nationalisation. See the Labour Party's platform for details.
Eh, while I find it harder every day to argue this I don't think it's particularly conservative to be racist; you get that in every part of the political spectrum.
Yes indeed, liberals and actual lefties can be horribly racist.
Let's agree on some terms, shall we?
Conservative: believes in traditional values including a strong work ethic and self-reliance. Some sympathy for the welfare state idea but skeptical that this will do much beyond creating reliance on the state for meeting people's needs. Usually desires for welfare to be coupled with some kind of work requirement. Often religious. Racism tends to be protectionist.
Liberal: believes in freedom in all areas. When coupled with progressivism this means a bit of a free-for-all in all areas and ridiculous efforts to avoid offending people which are often inadvertently (and hilariously) offensive. See "James Melville Safety Pin" for details and lulz. Often atheist. Racism tends to be paternalist.
Socialist: believes in the need for a welfare state and government intervention in All The Things. Egalitarian and collectivist. Often atheist, but this philosophy does appeal to some religious groups. Racism tends to be protectionist.
These are very basic definitions and they work for me.
Re: Re: IF your aunt had a dick she’d be your uncle
LOL! As a conservative Bible-believing Christian who espouses traditional views I often post my thoughts on Twitter, FB, and occasionally here. I haven't had the banhammer fall on me because I don't go out of my way to behave offensively even though I often argue with those people I disagree with.
I've been blocked, indeed, pre-emptively blocked by many people but I don't make a fuss about it, I move on.
If you don't want comments hidden or to be banned from any given platform, don't go out of your way to offend other people. It's really that simple.
It doesn't help that partisan enablers will rush to defend it when you call it out, often resorting to whataboutism to shut down discussion. We need to be both willing and able to hold these people to account. Since we're not we end up calling for violence when a calm and measured response is the better way.
On the post: Giant Copyright Troll, Malibu Media, Sued By Investors
Re: Re: Re:
About that brain bleach... where can I get some, please.
I must not read the hidden comments, they're hidden for a reason.
I must... why was this one hidden by the community?
I must not read the hidden comments, they're hidden for a reason.
On the post: Giant Copyright Troll, Malibu Media, Sued By Investors
Re: Re: I am shocked, shocked I say!
I must not gloat.
I must not gloat.
I must... okay, just a bit.
On the post: Giant Copyright Troll, Malibu Media, Sued By Investors
Re: Re: "Investors"
Hopefully not the inappropriate kind.
On the post: Giant Copyright Troll, Malibu Media, Sued By Investors
Re: Re: "Investors"
Scammers gonna scam, AC.
On the post: Giant Copyright Troll, Malibu Media, Sued By Investors
Re: Oh reality, showing up fiction yet again...
Honestly, the more someone virtue signals over their religion, the more suspicious of them I become. I rarely talk about my religion, but when I do, it's never been to portray myself as a trustworthy, good moral person. I let my conduct do the talking where self-portrayal is concerned.
As I've said before, wolves like to dress in sheep's clothing to make themselves look less wolfy. But no matter how much wool they wear, they're still predators.
On the post: Be Careful What You Wish For In Asking Silicon Valley To Police Speech Online
Re: Re: Go Cindy/EFF
AC, pay close and careful attention:
That red button at the end of the coloured bar at the top of every post is called the "Report" button.
Okay? This is important because the point of the button is to record the fact that we don't like your post. It doesn't belong here. We don't want to see it. Therefore we click it to report your post as undesirable.
I understand that if at least five people click that button, your post is hidden behind a grey line of text that indicates it is there. This line explicitly says, "This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it."
It's the community, i.e. the readers like myself, who click the button. We hid your troll posts, okay? Now stop whining about it and push off.
On the post: Be Careful What You Wish For In Asking Silicon Valley To Police Speech Online
Re: Re: Re:
Confirmed correct.
On the post: Top University Of California Scientists Tell Elsevier They'll No Longer Work On Elsevier Journals
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Communism fails because it's ultimately anarchist and doesn't take actual human nature into account. Result: power vacuum filled by paranoid authoritarian regime that tries to impose the unrealistic goals of the ideology on the people. This is where the violence, cruelty, and repression come from: it's to force people to make their ideological fantasies come true.
The same can be said of any philosophy requiring wishful thinking and suspension of disbelief among its adherents. I'm looking at you, Boris Johnson.
On the post: Top University Of California Scientists Tell Elsevier They'll No Longer Work On Elsevier Journals
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Or as I've often said, any notion predicated on a best case scenario is ultimately doomed to failure.
Bake some features of human nature and possible pitfalls into your model before you roll the damn thing out!
On the post: Top University Of California Scientists Tell Elsevier They'll No Longer Work On Elsevier Journals
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's the assumption that's the problem as evidenced by the state of capitalism today. Were the notion of the playing field being level actually true, we wouldn't be seeing the ridiculous disparity in incomes between those who do the actual work and their massively overpaid CEOs.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Particularly when they tell you that you're worth what the (rigged) market says you're worth. This is why I mock the big "L" libertarians. They want us to pretend that the market is a fair and balanced, and therefore the best and most efficient system for distribution of wealth and resources. No, it's not. If that were trued we'd have no homeless people.
On the post: The FBI Can't Get Into The Dayton Shooter's Phone. So What?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That seems reasonable to me. I just wish that enough other people thought the way you do.
On the post: UK Moves To Give Regulators Power To Fine Internet Companies 5% Of Revenue If They Can't Wave A Magic Wand And Make Bad Content Disappear
Re: Which is it?
Because the market is not some kind of gestalt entity with a will and a mind of its own. What you're suggesting is basically populism, ceding the internet to the lowest common denominator. I for one am not in favour of allowing the entire thing to turn into 8chan.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Ah, I got my information from Britain's Labour party, which is led by one Mr. Jeremy Corbyn, who has been repeatedly categorised as a dangerous lefty socialist-type thingy by the right wing press here in the UK.
Racism is very much alive in these circles, and tends to go along the lines of, "I suppose I ought to paint myself black, then see if there's any social housing, etc., available." The Other is always presented as "Front of the line for taking things meant for ourselves." That's what I mean by "protectionist" in that context. Right-wingers' protectionism tends to go along the lines of "They're intent on replacing de white folks!"
By "collectivism" I meant unionisation and nationalisation. See the Labour Party's platform for details.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Unless you're a veteran, in which case, enjoy being homeless.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re:
Would you believe that in Transylvania (modern Romania) today, he's still considered a good guy?
We're the ones who get the heebie jeebies at the mention of his name.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re: Re: Re:
Eh, while I find it harder every day to argue this I don't think it's particularly conservative to be racist; you get that in every part of the political spectrum.
Yes indeed, liberals and actual lefties can be horribly racist.
Let's agree on some terms, shall we?
Conservative: believes in traditional values including a strong work ethic and self-reliance. Some sympathy for the welfare state idea but skeptical that this will do much beyond creating reliance on the state for meeting people's needs. Usually desires for welfare to be coupled with some kind of work requirement. Often religious. Racism tends to be protectionist.
Liberal: believes in freedom in all areas. When coupled with progressivism this means a bit of a free-for-all in all areas and ridiculous efforts to avoid offending people which are often inadvertently (and hilariously) offensive. See "James Melville Safety Pin" for details and lulz. Often atheist. Racism tends to be paternalist.
Socialist: believes in the need for a welfare state and government intervention in All The Things. Egalitarian and collectivist. Often atheist, but this philosophy does appeal to some religious groups. Racism tends to be protectionist.
These are very basic definitions and they work for me.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Re: Re: IF your aunt had a dick she’d be your uncle
LOL! As a conservative Bible-believing Christian who espouses traditional views I often post my thoughts on Twitter, FB, and occasionally here. I haven't had the banhammer fall on me because I don't go out of my way to behave offensively even though I often argue with those people I disagree with.
I've been blocked, indeed, pre-emptively blocked by many people but I don't make a fuss about it, I move on.
If you don't want comments hidden or to be banned from any given platform, don't go out of your way to offend other people. It's really that simple.
On the post: Indian Counseling Company Files Criminal Complaint Against Blogger Who Informed It About A Sensitive Data Leak
Re:
It's the company that's at fault, not the court. It's not their fault the lawyers misled them.
On the post: Emails From License Plate Reader Company Hack Show Lobbyists Writing Legislation And Handing Out Talking Points To Congressional Reps
Re:
It doesn't help that partisan enablers will rush to defend it when you call it out, often resorting to whataboutism to shut down discussion. We need to be both willing and able to hold these people to account. Since we're not we end up calling for violence when a calm and measured response is the better way.
Next >>