As they also own the Batles and Jaymes mark, maybe E & J Gallo think they have the rights to anything something and something in any sort of drinky space.
Re: Re: Re: Sure, there is. It's called "training the slaves to obey authority without question". Been written down and practiced since at least ancient Rome.
Yeah, and when it is pointed out how there is nothing scientific about any of it, one still has to make a comment about how 'scientific doesn't mean good'.
Scientific does, however, mean scientific. Calling something scientific when it is, in fact, not, is either a lie or extremely sloppy thinking. Or both.
It also does not help to confuse the scientific method (which is what "scientific" means here), and any products of a scientific endeavour, which may be used for good or ill, and in which the particular endeavour itself may have been a bad idea or outright nefarious to begin with.
In that sense, scientific is not necessarily a good, but is also irrelevant when the subject at hand is not in the least scientific to begin with.
Further, there is little which is scientific in the example given. If one wanted to specifically address Nazi sciences, some of them are entirely unscientific also, merely being labelled as science. Others are entirely common to any system, such as base R&D which might be applied to weapons systems, but most of the development is actually engineering issues. (But it's funny how i have never heard similar commentary for engineering as i have heard regarding science, or what someone wishes to label as science. Which is the sign of something being super trope-y and not particularly a reflection of reality.)
Controversial? I don't care to speculate. But it is highly inaccurate. And there is at least one weenie somewhere who will always support some poorly reasoned statement or line of outright bullshit, no?
More they like lies so much that they vote patently obvious liars into any offices. No one really has had to bother trying to lie well at all for years at this point.
A free market _might_ create a monopoly. What a free market will always do is have a lifetime measured in picoseconds, if that. The market forces are not the consumers. They are the businesses. There ain't no such thing as a free market.
Re: Re: Given that executive orders don't create new laws
It comes from people who are paid to misinterpret the Constitution. And we are lucky if we ever get to see the convoluted reasoning, as it is usually classified for these types of things. There are other ways this happens too, such as Congress granting the Presidency powers it has no authority to grant.
Of course, this is not just in terms of the President. Various bits of government seem to like to "legalize", sometimes retroactively, all manners of abusive behavior, if they cannot simply bury or deny it.
Actually, you can watch any human beings, or grouping thereof, do exactly the same things on different scales in different situations.
Which is pretty much why the Constitution has been mostly a myth for many people since the ink dried on the page. Most everyone cherry-picks what they want of it and gives it their own interpretation, if they bother to think of it at all.
"Con" was in usage in the sixties so i don't see why not, even if that isn't the official billing or trademark. Something art con, comic something con, (location) con, GenCon.
Fun fact: What is currently known as the New York Comic Con is owned by Elsevier. Let's them and SDCC fight.
And... not-even-triangulation of what? Some test phone 10 months later.
So yeah, main point rather well mischaracterized. It is about RF signal propagation maps. Which is exactly what they are and how the prosecution refers to this "evidence".
According to the designer, the NBA logo is a direct derivative of the MLB logo. That's interesting.
Gut I have seen many logos over the years that use similar design features. It's part of the nature of a simplified logo, especially if you didn't want to have to print in sixteen colors on stationery and business cards and equipment. But are we confused by the logo of North American Moving?
On the post: E And J Gallo Sends Cease And Desist Trademark Notice To E And B Beer
As they also own the Batles and Jaymes mark, maybe E & J Gallo think they have the rights to anything something and something in any sort of drinky space.
On the post: Winnipeg Man Has Vanity Plate Referencing Star Trek Recalled Over Complaints Of How Racist It Is
Re: Re: Kill the Indian, save the man
On the post: Winnipeg Man Has Vanity Plate Referencing Star Trek Recalled Over Complaints Of How Racist It Is
Re: Re:
On the post: Teenager Reports Laughable Flaw In Budapest Transit Authority's Ticketing System And Is Promptly Arrested
Re: Better, Alternative Ending
On the post: Teenager Reports Laughable Flaw In Budapest Transit Authority's Ticketing System And Is Promptly Arrested
Re: Re: Re: Re: arrested for taking advantage of it
On the post: There Is Simply No Scientific Backing For TSA's Behavioral Detection Program
Re: Re:
*Or anything else the TSA does.
On the post: There Is Simply No Scientific Backing For TSA's Behavioral Detection Program
Re: Re: Re: Sure, there is. It's called "training the slaves to obey authority without question". Been written down and practiced since at least ancient Rome.
Scientific does, however, mean scientific. Calling something scientific when it is, in fact, not, is either a lie or extremely sloppy thinking. Or both.
It also does not help to confuse the scientific method (which is what "scientific" means here), and any products of a scientific endeavour, which may be used for good or ill, and in which the particular endeavour itself may have been a bad idea or outright nefarious to begin with.
In that sense, scientific is not necessarily a good, but is also irrelevant when the subject at hand is not in the least scientific to begin with.
Further, there is little which is scientific in the example given. If one wanted to specifically address Nazi sciences, some of them are entirely unscientific also, merely being labelled as science. Others are entirely common to any system, such as base R&D which might be applied to weapons systems, but most of the development is actually engineering issues. (But it's funny how i have never heard similar commentary for engineering as i have heard regarding science, or what someone wishes to label as science. Which is the sign of something being super trope-y and not particularly a reflection of reality.)
Controversial? I don't care to speculate. But it is highly inaccurate. And there is at least one weenie somewhere who will always support some poorly reasoned statement or line of outright bullshit, no?
On the post: Watchdog Stings Defense Dept., Obtains $1.2 Million In Military Gear With A Fake Cop Shop
Re: Dumping grounds
On the post: $89 Billion AT&T, Time Warner Merger Approval Looking Likely Despite Trump Pledge To Block Deal
Re: Re:
On the post: Lawsuits Pile Up For CenturyLink After Years Of Bogus Fees, Fraudulent Billing
Re: Re:
On the post: Lawsuits Pile Up For CenturyLink After Years Of Bogus Fees, Fraudulent Billing
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Senator Wyden Wants To Know How Many Times Americans Have Been Targeted By Executive Order 12333
Re: Re: Given that executive orders don't create new laws
It comes from people who are paid to misinterpret the Constitution. And we are lucky if we ever get to see the convoluted reasoning, as it is usually classified for these types of things. There are other ways this happens too, such as Congress granting the Presidency powers it has no authority to grant.
Of course, this is not just in terms of the President. Various bits of government seem to like to "legalize", sometimes retroactively, all manners of abusive behavior, if they cannot simply bury or deny it.
Actually, you can watch any human beings, or grouping thereof, do exactly the same things on different scales in different situations.
Which is pretty much why the Constitution has been mostly a myth for many people since the ink dried on the page. Most everyone cherry-picks what they want of it and gives it their own interpretation, if they bother to think of it at all.
On the post: Olive Garden Asks Olive Garden Reviewer Not To Refer To Olive Garden Due To Trademarks
Re: Re: Re: more cowbell
On the post: San Diego Comic Con Gets Gag Order On Salt Lake Comic Con
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Fun fact: What is currently known as the New York Comic Con is owned by Elsevier. Let's them and SDCC fight.
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History: July 16th - 22nd
That entity does, however, know how to co-opt smart and/or formerly well-intentioned people into it's hideous Borg self.
On the post: San Diego Comic Con Gets Gag Order On Salt Lake Comic Con
Re: Re: next up...
On the post: MLB Mulls Over Opposing Trademark For New Overwatch League Logo
Re:
https://youtu.be/w_Zo0R7amY8?t=233
On the post: Politician Uses Bad Cyberharassment Law To Shut Down Critic; Critic Hoping To Have Law Struck Down
On the post: Court Rejects Cell Site RF Signal Map In Murder Trial Because It's Evidence Of Nothing
Re: Re:
And... not-even-triangulation of what? Some test phone 10 months later.
So yeah, main point rather well mischaracterized. It is about RF signal propagation maps. Which is exactly what they are and how the prosecution refers to this "evidence".
On the post: MLB Mulls Over Opposing Trademark For New Overwatch League Logo
According to the designer, the NBA logo is a direct derivative of the MLB logo. That's interesting.
Gut I have seen many logos over the years that use similar design features. It's part of the nature of a simplified logo, especially if you didn't want to have to print in sixteen colors on stationery and business cards and equipment. But are we confused by the logo of North American Moving?
Next >>