An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
Since you like spamming the same thing over and over again, I shall reply similarly:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
Re: Re: You're lying again! Was NOT simply re-instated. CHANGED.
You’re not entirely right. The DMCA simply requires a policy be in place and be followed so long as it adheres to certain requirements. The new policy still does so, so GitHub is still immune.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
Re: Obviously the author and many commenters hate Trump.
You know what? I don't think Trump is leaving anytime soon, and I'll be glad if he stays. There's a criminal investigation of the Bidens and other sources involving actual fraud, unlike the unproven court distraction filings used to delay state certification.
Unless you have reason to believe that the feds can find what all these people could not, and that enough of the votes would be changed to make a difference in enough states to actually change the results, I fail to see how that will change anything. Maybe it would make Kamala Harris or Nancy Pelosi President instead of Biden, but it still won’t be Trump.
As for the comments from the Trump supporter mobbed by haters, just give up. There's too much bias for Biden to get them to listen and understand that Trump is the better candidate, even if he's not the perfect one. I'm sure they'll make fun of me for sticking up for you.
Well, for one thing, if we’re biased, we’re biased against Trump, not for Biden. Most of us see Biden as simply better than Trump but far from ideal. We also don’t simply accept claims of massive voter/election fraud without substantial credible evidence and can do math. There were a few who claimed that voter/election fraud might have happened in 2016 that favored Trump that would have changed that election, but we didn’t believe it then, either. And that election was much closer than this one.
Trump is a smart guy and many of his supporters are too. Trump is stalling state certification if he cannot get victories from the remaining undecided states. Even if that fails, I am certain that he will not concede power to the corrupt Biden administration attempting to succeed him. The million MAGA march proves Trump's support is strong and so long as he has this kind of support, I doubt he'll go anywhere.
Slight problems with that plan (which is also fascist, anti-American, and anti-democratic, btw):
If neither candidate wins 270 electoral votes, then the election gets decided by the House of Representatives, which has a Democrat majority.
Failing to concede the election won’t actually change anything. On January 20th, whoever wins the election becomes President, so Trump will no longer be President unless he secures an actual win; he can’t simply win by default here.
If there is no President-elect or Vice President-elect and the sitting President fails to secure an actual win by January 20th, then the office passes to the leader of the House of Representatives: Nancy Pelosi. Again, a sitting president can’t simply win by default in such a case.
Did you forget all the people who marched against Trump? They were also in the millions.
With regards to the border, I think it’s also because they also pay more directly for the border wall and border enforcement, such as eminent domain and loss of constitutional rights.
Re: Re: Re: Re: More counted votes => more democracy.
They've spent four years being the silent or actively approving accomplices.
Let’s be fair for just a moment here: not all of them have. Mitt Romney, for example, has been outspoken in his lack of support for Trump and voted to convict him in the impeachment.
Accepting them at their word, they’re two people (a boyfriend and girlfriend) who share a computer and can’t be bothered to use two different pseudonyms to make it clear which won is writing what.
Re: Bring back impartial reporting, this article is BIAS.
Bring back impartial reporting, this article is BIAS.
This is an opinion blog, not a news site. That inevitably means there will be some bias, and there should be less of an expectation for impartial reporting. That said, this article isn’t even that biased, as I cover below.
The only bit that's worth a damn is the fact the Trump campaign screwed up by using a copywritten song without the expressed permission of the artist, which isn't the first time, for any candidate, BIG DEAL.
And this site has commented on those occasions when other candidates make the same mistake. They aren’t solely commenting on this because it’s Trump.
That’s also pretty much what most of the article is about; everything else was an intro and not important to the main subject. So yeah, you’re basically saying the article was right.
Really, at worst, this article frames the person who is central to the topic of the article (Trump) in an arguably biased manner, but there’s no bias in the main thrust of the article or in the site decision to report on Trump’s mistake in this area to begin with.
Even granting you everything you say about Trump, Biden, and the election as true (which I firmly disagree with), the fact is that there is nothing biased or unusual about the main thrust of the article. And that’s on top of the fact that this site doesn’t pretend to be all that impartial to begin with.
On the post: Why Don't Conservatives Care About Copyright?
Re: Re:
No it isn’t!
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Why Don't Conservatives Care About Copyright?
Re: Re:
Since you like spamming the same thing over and over again, I shall reply similarly:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Why Don't Conservatives Care About Copyright?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Since you still don’t get it:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Why Don't Conservatives Care About Copyright?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Once again:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Why Don't Conservatives Care About Copyright?
Re: Re: Re: Trash Article
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: New Study Finds No Evidence Of Anti-Conservative Bias In Facebook Moderation (If Anything, It's The Opposite)
Re:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: New Study Finds No Evidence Of Anti-Conservative Bias In Facebook Moderation (If Anything, It's The Opposite)
Re:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Trump Campaign Gets Laughed Out Of Court For Claiming A Bunch Of Unvetted Webform Submissions Is 'Evidence' Of Voter Fraud
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Donald Trump Argues That Use Of 'Electric Avenue' In Campaign Video Was Transformative
Re: Re:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: GitHub, EFF Push Back Against RIAA, Reinstate Youtube-dl Repository
Re: "content won't always be removed right away"? FINE WITH ME!
The Cox decisions were about failing to adhere to a policy. That’s not the case here.
On the post: GitHub, EFF Push Back Against RIAA, Reinstate Youtube-dl Repository
Re: Re: You're lying again! Was NOT simply re-instated. CHANGED.
You’re not entirely right. The DMCA simply requires a policy be in place and be followed so long as it adheres to certain requirements. The new policy still does so, so GitHub is still immune.
On the post: GitHub, EFF Push Back Against RIAA, Reinstate Youtube-dl Repository
Re: You're lying again! Was NOT simply re-instated. CHANGED.
Doesn’t matter. They still ignored Supreme Court precedent. In court, how you get the end result is more important than the end result itself.
On the post: Trump Fires US Cybersecurity Director Chris Krebs After Krebs Debunks Trump's Claims Of Election Systems Fraud
Re: Trash Article
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Why Don't Conservatives Care About Copyright?
Re: Re:
An argument isn’t just contradiction. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
On the post: Trump Campaign Gets Laughed Out Of Court For Claiming A Bunch Of Unvetted Webform Submissions Is 'Evidence' Of Voter Fraud
Re: Obviously the author and many commenters hate Trump.
Unless you have reason to believe that the feds can find what all these people could not, and that enough of the votes would be changed to make a difference in enough states to actually change the results, I fail to see how that will change anything. Maybe it would make Kamala Harris or Nancy Pelosi President instead of Biden, but it still won’t be Trump.
Well, for one thing, if we’re biased, we’re biased against Trump, not for Biden. Most of us see Biden as simply better than Trump but far from ideal. We also don’t simply accept claims of massive voter/election fraud without substantial credible evidence and can do math. There were a few who claimed that voter/election fraud might have happened in 2016 that favored Trump that would have changed that election, but we didn’t believe it then, either. And that election was much closer than this one.
Slight problems with that plan (which is also fascist, anti-American, and anti-democratic, btw):
If neither candidate wins 270 electoral votes, then the election gets decided by the House of Representatives, which has a Democrat majority.
Failing to concede the election won’t actually change anything. On January 20th, whoever wins the election becomes President, so Trump will no longer be President unless he secures an actual win; he can’t simply win by default here.
If there is no President-elect or Vice President-elect and the sitting President fails to secure an actual win by January 20th, then the office passes to the leader of the House of Representatives: Nancy Pelosi. Again, a sitting president can’t simply win by default in such a case.
On the post: Trump Campaign Gets Laughed Out Of Court For Claiming A Bunch Of Unvetted Webform Submissions Is 'Evidence' Of Voter Fraud
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
With regards to the border, I think it’s also because they also pay more directly for the border wall and border enforcement, such as eminent domain and loss of constitutional rights.
On the post: Trump Campaign Gets Laughed Out Of Court For Claiming A Bunch Of Unvetted Webform Submissions Is 'Evidence' Of Voter Fraud
Re: Re: Re: Re: More counted votes => more democracy.
Let’s be fair for just a moment here: not all of them have. Mitt Romney, for example, has been outspoken in his lack of support for Trump and voted to convict him in the impeachment.
On the post: Donald Trump Argues That Use Of 'Electric Avenue' In Campaign Video Was Transformative
Re:
Which they have.
Still waiting on actual evidence of that.
On the post: Donald Trump Argues That Use Of 'Electric Avenue' In Campaign Video Was Transformative
Re:
Accepting them at their word, they’re two people (a boyfriend and girlfriend) who share a computer and can’t be bothered to use two different pseudonyms to make it clear which won is writing what.
On the post: Donald Trump Argues That Use Of 'Electric Avenue' In Campaign Video Was Transformative
Re: Bring back impartial reporting, this article is BIAS.
This is an opinion blog, not a news site. That inevitably means there will be some bias, and there should be less of an expectation for impartial reporting. That said, this article isn’t even that biased, as I cover below.
And this site has commented on those occasions when other candidates make the same mistake. They aren’t solely commenting on this because it’s Trump.
That’s also pretty much what most of the article is about; everything else was an intro and not important to the main subject. So yeah, you’re basically saying the article was right.
Really, at worst, this article frames the person who is central to the topic of the article (Trump) in an arguably biased manner, but there’s no bias in the main thrust of the article or in the site decision to report on Trump’s mistake in this area to begin with.
Even granting you everything you say about Trump, Biden, and the election as true (which I firmly disagree with), the fact is that there is nothing biased or unusual about the main thrust of the article. And that’s on top of the fact that this site doesn’t pretend to be all that impartial to begin with.
Next >>