The USA gov decided that the employment rates were to high, and figured ONLY counting certain things and ways to SEE' the true rate. NOT counting those that were NOT using the Facilities(that only last so long) was a Much better way to see the numbers.
When the true numbers were in double digits, seeing 3-5% was better then 10-20%.
Anyone remember Trump wanting to limit the number to TESTS to evaluate the Virus.
Ya, I get it, DONT count things that YOU think arnt relevant.
"Should YouTube consider a "three strikes" system that punishes false copyright claims, rather than just those wrongly targeted by ContentID matches? "
HOW about 1000?
How about 10,000?
Just NAME a number and stick to it.
The Odds are that Most False claims from the corps will hit it in 1 year or less.
Billions of ntices every year, and what are the odds, ALL of the major agencies will hit 10,000 false claims?
AND lets not just Count YT. Google is big enough to see A very large share of the False hits. Count them.
Why is there an agency that Thinks(or doesnt) that Monitoring EVERYTHING on the net is an ability?
Someone get me a 10yo, to explain how many ways he can talk to friends and everyone else, on the net.
Ask your kid if he knows All the people he talks to and where they live.
then lets ask What did we do before the internet, if we wanted to have a secret.
You would Probably need 1/2 the world to monitor the other 1/2 of the world.
Read every email, find every chat and forum, search every game chat and Steam, Epic, and everything else you can find.
Then consider that This can only be done on a server controled idea. UNLESS you have a way to track Client to client software, running threw a server but not using much of any of it to work.
you would need Data searches running over every data trace going threw every server, to see what it is. ANd SLOW every internet connection in the USA to 56k.
Hmm, how to enforce this, in 9/10 of the world..
Even if we can get the EU/Aussie/North america to do it.
~150 other nations, and Still 8/10 of the world.
Would love to enforce this in Kamchatka.
Then we get this strange thought. What is connected to the net.
EVERYTHING.
So we regulate.
Cellphones
Computers
Refrigerators.
Toys
House hold devices that control LIGHTS, Toasters, everything else.
Drones?
Airplanes?
SMART TV?
DVD?
Dont need to continue,
Just consider your home EMPTY.
I wonder if any of these people have ever seen a Kindergarten room, full of kids given a choice of something to do, WITH NO GUIDANCE from teachers.
Anyone with abit of past history on the net and forums, Will tell you how bad it used to be. Including CompuServe and Prodigy and a few others.
Has anyone ever Not seen a forum thats been hit by Spam? Or a person that would not change their mind, given 1000 ways to disprove his opinion.
Anyone know a person who thinks Magic done on stage is REAL, or pro Wrestling(most isnt real)
almost.
If you got enough money, we just want a part of it, or we make your life hell. Is the gov attitude. They will even HELP you make more, as long as they get their share.
They will let you mess with the stock exchange and the banks.
Even change the laws so you can be Right, and everyone else is wrong until someone pays them more to change it again.
You can even get us to got war for Some odd reason, like rebuilding a nation into a Mass producer of goods, turn all the farmers into Cheap Manufacturing labor.
That is true, we need Main fiber Lines to connect Each town, AT the least.
Then the towns can handle the internal build ups.
(anyone want to start a company?)
There Are allot of Dead Fiber lines out there, the old stuff, thats Not been upgraded.
It would also be NICE, to build the infrastructure to have it Fix/maintained/Upgraded easily. It might add tot he price, but makes things Cheaper LATER.
What are the odds, that the Tier 1, Internet owners create a few companies to dot he work, and use that as Another write-off.
" Encryption is for criminals they claim, "
"Ministers could be banned from using self-destructing messages on Whatsapp or Signal for official business "
Love these comments.
Think how paranoid you could make a police officer, by whispering to your Passenger a few times.
If you are paranoid that your constituents Might not Like what you are doing/saying. QUIT doing.
I still suggest that Those Elected are Employees, and should be treated As Such. And I think its Time to remind them, and those that come After.
the rich person that can DEAL with it, and make it last Forever.
The 1/2 way up the ladder people/sites??
Bottom of the barrel that will Do anything to get you to leave them alone, and give you $1000-10,000.
There are Allot of those on the bottom.
What is the difference between those that USED to own the Tier1 section of the net, and NOW with these Corps owning all of it, and then thinking of restricting anything Out of those areas they OWN, insted of sharing the Whole thing?
I would really like the FCC to show Proof that the Whole backbone has been updated and upgraded.
On the post: FBI Scores Itself Another Lawsuit For Using The No Fly List To Punish A Lebanese Man For Not Becoming An Informant
And you wonder?
"The FBI has spent years using informants to radicalize people,"
Why the USA is scared of everyone else?
On the post: Crime Rates Drop After The City Of Baltimore Decides It's Not Going To Waste Resources Prosecuting Minor Offenses
Long ago..
The USA gov decided that the employment rates were to high, and figured ONLY counting certain things and ways to SEE' the true rate. NOT counting those that were NOT using the Facilities(that only last so long) was a Much better way to see the numbers.
When the true numbers were in double digits, seeing 3-5% was better then 10-20%.
Anyone remember Trump wanting to limit the number to TESTS to evaluate the Virus.
Ya, I get it, DONT count things that YOU think arnt relevant.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: NASA Footage Taken Down By YouTube Moderation (2012)
Really?
"Should YouTube consider a "three strikes" system that punishes false copyright claims, rather than just those wrongly targeted by ContentID matches? "
HOW about 1000?
How about 10,000?
Just NAME a number and stick to it.
The Odds are that Most False claims from the corps will hit it in 1 year or less.
Billions of ntices every year, and what are the odds, ALL of the major agencies will hit 10,000 false claims?
AND lets not just Count YT. Google is big enough to see A very large share of the False hits. Count them.
On the post: Justice Thomas Goes Weird Again; Suggests Twitter Can't Moderate & Section 230 Violates 1st Amendment
Re: Re: Re: Re:
HUNT the Wumpus on a teletype.
On the post: Justice Thomas Goes Weird Again; Suggests Twitter Can't Moderate & Section 230 Violates 1st Amendment
Re: Re: Re:
Modifying my C64 so I could use a REAL modem
Learning hardware controls on a C64.
Playing Pong on a NEW machine.
On the post: UK Politicians Getting Serious About Ending End-To-End Encryption
Re: Re: Logic of the situation?
Discredit?
Big word with a big meaning.
Discredit only means you Have done something you are embarrassed about.
On the post: Judge Says DEA, TSA Can Continue To Be Sued For Stealing Cash From Airline Passengers
Q:
Umm,
How many very rich people have been stopped? and money taken?
OR are they able to Bypass all this?
On the post: UK Politicians Getting Serious About Ending End-To-End Encryption
Logic of the situation?
Umm, ya.
Why is there an agency that Thinks(or doesnt) that Monitoring EVERYTHING on the net is an ability?
Someone get me a 10yo, to explain how many ways he can talk to friends and everyone else, on the net.
Ask your kid if he knows All the people he talks to and where they live.
then lets ask What did we do before the internet, if we wanted to have a secret.
You would Probably need 1/2 the world to monitor the other 1/2 of the world.
Read every email, find every chat and forum, search every game chat and Steam, Epic, and everything else you can find.
Then consider that This can only be done on a server controled idea. UNLESS you have a way to track Client to client software, running threw a server but not using much of any of it to work.
you would need Data searches running over every data trace going threw every server, to see what it is. ANd SLOW every internet connection in the USA to 56k.
On the post: Australian Government Proposes Stripping Internet Users Of Their Anonymity
Eye exam time
Hmm, how to enforce this, in 9/10 of the world..
Even if we can get the EU/Aussie/North america to do it.
~150 other nations, and Still 8/10 of the world.
Would love to enforce this in Kamchatka.
Then we get this strange thought. What is connected to the net.
EVERYTHING.
So we regulate.
Cellphones
Computers
Refrigerators.
Toys
House hold devices that control LIGHTS, Toasters, everything else.
Drones?
Airplanes?
SMART TV?
DVD?
Dont need to continue,
Just consider your home EMPTY.
On the post: Justice Thomas Goes Weird Again; Suggests Twitter Can't Moderate & Section 230 Violates 1st Amendment
Re:
On the post: UK Legislators Are Using Encrypted Messaging Services To Possibly Dodge Records Requests
Re:
almost.
If you got enough money, we just want a part of it, or we make your life hell. Is the gov attitude. They will even HELP you make more, as long as they get their share.
They will let you mess with the stock exchange and the banks.
Even change the laws so you can be Right, and everyone else is wrong until someone pays them more to change it again.
You can even get us to got war for Some odd reason, like rebuilding a nation into a Mass producer of goods, turn all the farmers into Cheap Manufacturing labor.
On the post: Biden Broadband Plan Embraces Community Broadband In Stark Contrast To Trump
Re: Backbones?
That is true, we need Main fiber Lines to connect Each town, AT the least.
Then the towns can handle the internal build ups.
(anyone want to start a company?)
There Are allot of Dead Fiber lines out there, the old stuff, thats Not been upgraded.
It would also be NICE, to build the infrastructure to have it Fix/maintained/Upgraded easily. It might add tot he price, but makes things Cheaper LATER.
What are the odds, that the Tier 1, Internet owners create a few companies to dot he work, and use that as Another write-off.
On the post: UK Legislators Are Using Encrypted Messaging Services To Possibly Dodge Records Requests
How far to go?
" Encryption is for criminals they claim, "
"Ministers could be banned from using self-destructing messages on Whatsapp or Signal for official business "
Love these comments.
Think how paranoid you could make a police officer, by whispering to your Passenger a few times.
If you are paranoid that your constituents Might not Like what you are doing/saying. QUIT doing.
I still suggest that Those Elected are Employees, and should be treated As Such. And I think its Time to remind them, and those that come After.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Loved the show, but its a great comment.
http://www.torcnm.org/
On the post: How Mark Warner's 'SAFE TECH Act' Will Make Many People A Lot Less Safe
Who to sue?
the rich person that can DEAL with it, and make it last Forever.
The 1/2 way up the ladder people/sites??
Bottom of the barrel that will Do anything to get you to leave them alone, and give you $1000-10,000.
There are Allot of those on the bottom.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: Facebook Removes A Picture Of A Famous Danish Mermaid Statue (2016)
Waiting for it.
Ever hear how the Statues in the Vatican lost all their dicks?
On the post: Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law
Just to ask
What is the difference between those that USED to own the Tier1 section of the net, and NOW with these Corps owning all of it, and then thinking of restricting anything Out of those areas they OWN, insted of sharing the Whole thing?
I would really like the FCC to show Proof that the Whole backbone has been updated and upgraded.
On the post: Congressional Panel On Internet And Disinformation... Includes Many Who Spread Disinformation Online
Lets
Let the CIA do all the Spreading.
They know how to do it, PROPERLY.
On the post: Sidney Powell Asks Court To Dismiss Defamation Lawsuit Because She Was Just Engaging In Heated Hyperbole... Even When She Was Filing Lawsuits
Re: So,
Is this SOME way to Show that Republicans have EVERY RIGHT TO BE IDIOTS, Because they dont read anything FOR A PURPOSE?
On the post: Sidney Powell Asks Court To Dismiss Defamation Lawsuit Because She Was Just Engaging In Heated Hyperbole... Even When She Was Filing Lawsuits
So,
A Fully knowledgeable person, declaring SOMETHING is FACT, and Blatantly LYING.
Next >>