I like the idea of confusing the RED states into thinking this is Something it aint.
The Blue states thinking they are doing the right thing.
And still no one gets the problem, or fixes it.
How much have we given away? Its funny tho, that most of the money has been in the millions, NOT trillions(to the ISP's). ITS not cheap to do that work, so Why not GET those specialty companies that LAY FIBEr to do it, and then the Gov. can setup their OWN SITES around the USA to monitor ALL of us, like they were in the old phone days.
Even when they say they are Anon, they arnt. Or they change their minds.
The internet has made this very simple.
Get a name or address, and the internet is the BIG automated phone book.
Insert one of them and you will get a list 10,000 miles long. Inset the city and you can get down to 10-100, names and address's.
There are a few sites that will give you Multiple address's for the name, so you can use it to verify.
ALL this because the US Gov. didnt do something along time ago.
You SS# is NOT supposed to be used for Identification. and the credit Bureau, Loves the gov. for them NOT enforceing things.
Then for every Contract you sign that has money involved, its SENT to them.
Its a rough world when even the smart people think being Anon, is safer then Standing OUT in the crowd.
Its Funny to see a nation with freedom of speech, and most people seem afraid. But the problem tends to be, Who we Need to listen. And where to find them.
Iv noted before that allot of the old social groups have almost disappeared. But that include Other in the list of groups that have been broken up.
Re: Re: Prison Guards, Police, Priests, and boy scout leaders
The deterrent to this tends to Be EQUAL to a parent abusing their Own responsibility.
You can take the responsibility away, but that isnt really a deterrent.
You and Publicly denounce them, but most people wont give a darn.
You can Physically Abuse them in a way they SHOULD not be public.
We can do the 3 strikes rule.(we dont even use that on cops)
Doing anything Public, becomes Forever, because someone will always remember or look up the info. And that ISNT good.
I would suggest Given them all a choice of Multiple ways to deal with it. really. Along with a 3 strikes and allot of monitoring.
And the last 2 depends on what they did, and if we need to get them Married.
there is a discontinuity in our gov.
They ARNT the smartest people, so you would think they would Ask or Hire those that know abit more then they do. Or even create an agency that would handle all this, and Maybe explain a few things you Dont know.
But for some reason, we have gotten Rid of those people/agencies/ and soforth.
These folks are so smart they aint even asked the people that Hired them, what we want them to do.
The Corps know More about the citizens then our gov does. And the corps created a few things, I dont know IF the gov. has made copies of.
maybe not, but.
Not to long ago they could show up with Bags of mail, and show that all of those people who wrote in, Wanted This or that.
The big part of this, is TRYING to have a list of every person in the USA, and Where they ARE, where they live,work, and just about everything else. In a file to Use to confirm Identity.
But even at that, you cant prove if they wrote a letter, wrote a Email, called the congress or state reps, and DID ANYTHING, without contacting them Personally, and verify them with DOT pictures.
How far do you want to go with that?
Dear AC.
If you didnt notice.
Windows has this GREAT history file, buried into your system.
I hope you erased ALL OF THEM.
Then also note, that in <1 min one of these groups can Install a Keylogger, and that on Next inspection, it will be Copied and looked at.
Get a program to Verify ALL programs and makes a list of them. Then Verifies NO NEW ONES have been installed.
Just get a Netbook. they dont understand those at all.
Hmm
Anyone think this is riding on what has already happened in the EU.
Would love to have our politicians TELL US' what they want in simple language.
Do you want the NET to HOLD onto everything.
Or Censor the crap and bad language(define bad language)
Then we need the Internet to Tell the Congress WHAT IT CANT/WONT Censor.
then get the idea that the INTERNET is an international THING. And speaking Only english/american is NOT Normal.
Re: Re: You know what, let’s make a challenge for these senato
"prohibited from blocking non-illegal content "
But this is the concern, most of this is about. 2groups that Kinda want the opposite. but also the ability to FIND someone with money, to SUE. and deciding What is illegal.
An Advert ISNT illegal, Spam isnt REALLY illegal if the FCC wont do anything, taking a subject Off topic isnt illegal, Fake sales isnt illegal(generally not from Inside the USA). OPINION isnt illegal.
There are allot of things censored, because it is Garbage. but as with Newspapers, They are protected. And Opinion is protected, but this would remove the Stated Point that the internet is no better, no worse then those others. IF TV didnt have a small amount of protection, FOX probably wouldnt be on TV.
Corp entity make money from YOUR WORK.
Even tho its the best advert, FREE, they can get.
what would be nice, is them getting money from you, While you make hand made goods from Their characters.
Then they wonder why innovation disappeared.
Do remember it was long ago, that 1 nations Copyrights didnt go OVER the border.
On the post: Without Twitter, Trump Is Left To Write Tweets He Would Have Said On Paper
DAM
Wheres my Bird cage?
Now wheres my bird..
Hold it, I have a cat,
and a litter box.
That works. Just need more newspaper.
On the post: DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules
Re:
I like the idea of confusing the RED states into thinking this is Something it aint.
The Blue states thinking they are doing the right thing.
And still no one gets the problem, or fixes it.
How much have we given away? Its funny tho, that most of the money has been in the millions, NOT trillions(to the ISP's). ITS not cheap to do that work, so Why not GET those specialty companies that LAY FIBEr to do it, and then the Gov. can setup their OWN SITES around the USA to monitor ALL of us, like they were in the old phone days.
On the post: In The Rush To Strengthen Antitrust Law, We Could Kill Useful Mergers And Acquisitions
ADD
That it would improve, and not increase the time waiting on the phone for customer service nor Delivery of service at location.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re:
If you didnt learn that from your grand parents and Parents while you were growing up...
WHACK, shut up.
You aint lived.
On the post: NYT Easily Tracks Location Data From Capitol Riots, Highlighting Once Again How US Privacy Standards Are A Joke
The Big one.
Even when they say they are Anon, they arnt. Or they change their minds.
The internet has made this very simple.
Get a name or address, and the internet is the BIG automated phone book.
Insert one of them and you will get a list 10,000 miles long. Inset the city and you can get down to 10-100, names and address's.
There are a few sites that will give you Multiple address's for the name, so you can use it to verify.
ALL this because the US Gov. didnt do something along time ago.
You SS# is NOT supposed to be used for Identification. and the credit Bureau, Loves the gov. for them NOT enforceing things.
Then for every Contract you sign that has money involved, its SENT to them.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
freedom to speak.
Its a rough world when even the smart people think being Anon, is safer then Standing OUT in the crowd.
Its Funny to see a nation with freedom of speech, and most people seem afraid. But the problem tends to be, Who we Need to listen. And where to find them.
Iv noted before that allot of the old social groups have almost disappeared. But that include Other in the list of groups that have been broken up.
On the post: Now It's The Democrats Turn To Destroy The Open Internet: Mark Warner's 230 Reform Bill Is A Dumpster Fire Of Cluelessness
"saying that startups are too small to sue,"
I wonder if he understands LAW?
REALLY, what the hell?
On the post: Daily Deal: Motorola FOCUS89 Full HD Wi-Fi Indoor Camera
32 gig?
Sounds like 8-10 year old tech.
looks allot like the last one you had up.
Image sensor Colour CMOS 1M Pixels
Lens f=2.80mm, F=2.5
IR LED 8 pcs
Memory card Micro-SD type, up to 32GB Class 4 or above
really seems like 2 generation old. and 1megapixel is closer to 720p.
Very lacking in info.
On the post: After Years Of Ignoring Abuse At A Women's Prison, Department Of Corrections Suspends Nearly Three Dozen Employees
Re: Re: Prison Guards, Police, Priests, and boy scout leaders
The deterrent to this tends to Be EQUAL to a parent abusing their Own responsibility.
You can take the responsibility away, but that isnt really a deterrent.
You and Publicly denounce them, but most people wont give a darn.
You can Physically Abuse them in a way they SHOULD not be public.
We can do the 3 strikes rule.(we dont even use that on cops)
Doing anything Public, becomes Forever, because someone will always remember or look up the info. And that ISNT good.
I would suggest Given them all a choice of Multiple ways to deal with it. really. Along with a 3 strikes and allot of monitoring.
And the last 2 depends on what they did, and if we need to get them Married.
On the post: Huawei Attempts To Rebuild Trust By Using... Fake Twitter Telecom Experts
Re: Re:
there is a discontinuity in our gov.
They ARNT the smartest people, so you would think they would Ask or Hire those that know abit more then they do. Or even create an agency that would handle all this, and Maybe explain a few things you Dont know.
But for some reason, we have gotten Rid of those people/agencies/ and soforth.
These folks are so smart they aint even asked the people that Hired them, what we want them to do.
The Corps know More about the citizens then our gov does. And the corps created a few things, I dont know IF the gov. has made copies of.
On the post: Huawei Attempts To Rebuild Trust By Using... Fake Twitter Telecom Experts
Re:
maybe not, but.
Not to long ago they could show up with Bags of mail, and show that all of those people who wrote in, Wanted This or that.
The big part of this, is TRYING to have a list of every person in the USA, and Where they ARE, where they live,work, and just about everything else. In a file to Use to confirm Identity.
But even at that, you cant prove if they wrote a letter, wrote a Email, called the congress or state reps, and DID ANYTHING, without contacting them Personally, and verify them with DOT pictures.
How far do you want to go with that?
On the post: Texas Immigration Lawyer Sues DHS, CBP Over Seizure And Search Of His Work Phone
Re:
Dear AC.
If you didnt notice.
Windows has this GREAT history file, buried into your system.
I hope you erased ALL OF THEM.
Then also note, that in <1 min one of these groups can Install a Keylogger, and that on Next inspection, it will be Copied and looked at.
Get a program to Verify ALL programs and makes a list of them. Then Verifies NO NEW ONES have been installed.
Just get a Netbook. they dont understand those at all.
On the post: After Years Of Ignoring Abuse At A Women's Prison, Department Of Corrections Suspends Nearly Three Dozen Employees
Re: Re:
Most americans cant tell you the rights they have.
Let alone what freedom is.
On the post: Various States All Pile On To Push Blatantly Unconstitutional Laws That Say Social Media Can't Moderate
This seems familier.
Hmm
Anyone think this is riding on what has already happened in the EU.
Would love to have our politicians TELL US' what they want in simple language.
Do you want the NET to HOLD onto everything.
Or Censor the crap and bad language(define bad language)
Then we need the Internet to Tell the Congress WHAT IT CANT/WONT Censor.
then get the idea that the INTERNET is an international THING. And speaking Only english/american is NOT Normal.
On the post: Joe Lieberman Couldn't Understand Content Moderation When He Was A Senator, But Says If We Get Rid Of 230, It'll Be Fine
Re:
AC..
Got a better idea.
Lets ask Congress to HOST an important bill on the net, 1 DAY, and we advert it.
Just 1 day.
Anyone remember when the Gov. had a couple NEW sites go up?
AND THEY GOT SMASHED?? 1 million hits. Worse then being on HOLD with only 2 operators.
DARE them to do it.
On the post: Joe Lieberman Couldn't Understand Content Moderation When He Was A Senator, But Says If We Get Rid Of 230, It'll Be Fine
Re: Re: You know what, let’s make a challenge for these senato
"prohibited from blocking non-illegal content "
But this is the concern, most of this is about. 2groups that Kinda want the opposite. but also the ability to FIND someone with money, to SUE. and deciding What is illegal.
An Advert ISNT illegal, Spam isnt REALLY illegal if the FCC wont do anything, taking a subject Off topic isnt illegal, Fake sales isnt illegal(generally not from Inside the USA). OPINION isnt illegal.
There are allot of things censored, because it is Garbage. but as with Newspapers, They are protected. And Opinion is protected, but this would remove the Stated Point that the internet is no better, no worse then those others. IF TV didnt have a small amount of protection, FOX probably wouldnt be on TV.
On the post: Joe Lieberman Couldn't Understand Content Moderation When He Was A Senator, But Says If We Get Rid Of 230, It'll Be Fine
Re: Re: Already Exists
but you didnt give the silly part of those 2 cases.
one got in trouble for censoring
Other got in trouble for NOT censoring.
On the post: Japan Looks To Amend Copyright Law To Force Some Cosplayers To Pay To Cosplay
Re:
Corp entity make money from YOUR WORK.
Even tho its the best advert, FREE, they can get.
what would be nice, is them getting money from you, While you make hand made goods from Their characters.
Then they wonder why innovation disappeared.
Do remember it was long ago, that 1 nations Copyrights didnt go OVER the border.
On the post: Japan Looks To Amend Copyright Law To Force Some Cosplayers To Pay To Cosplay
Re:
WOW,
Capitalism at its best.
Get every penny you THINK you can.
Dont think about the outcome. Just screw your customers.
On the post: Joe Lieberman Couldn't Understand Content Moderation When He Was A Senator, But Says If We Get Rid Of 230, It'll Be Fine
Re: Re: You know what, let’s make a challenge for these senato
If you dont get the ending.
(keep us in the dark and feed us BS)
Next >>