2009: Publisher decides an ebook was a mistake and tells Amazon to pull it. Amazon may or may not think that's a hot idea, but they have to comply if they want to keep their deals with the publisher. Ebook is pulled, Amazon gets blamed.
of course they will, if they want to keep there customers they should protect them. If you have books but no customers your not going far, but if you have customers then publishers will have no choice but to deal with you, I am sure you are familiar with the saying "if you build it they will come"/div>
Honestly, the story is somewhat surreal and feels quite like the trial itself: a lot of people not really taking things seriously.
have you ever been to TPB? they use to have a section where they posted letter they received by companies asking them to remove that is copyrighted or threatening them to sue with the responses they sent. TBP staff always made fun of them in there replies./div>
"A UK judge has required the unveiling of an anonymous police blogger, claiming blogging is "essentially a public rather than a private activity," and thus, there is no right to anonymity."
Not that I am agreeing with the Judge but he has a point in what he said, it should certainly not be dismissed so fast./div>
"Savvis -- who had audited the security of CardSystems' computer systems and determined that the company "had implemented sufficient security solutions and operated in a manner consistent with industry best practices."
lawsuit will go nowere Savvis never said data is secure it only said:
the company "had implemented sufficient security solutions and operated in a manner consistent with industry best practices.
which has nothing to do with Data breach:
-Everyone (or at least most ppl) know that its impossible to have a 100% secure system.
-Savvis never rated security of system, it simply said system is with in the norm.
so unless that system was below standard (and some1 can prove that) Savvis has no liability what so ever./div>
"It looks like maybe the PRS is beginning to understand that without useful distribution (like that provided by YouTube), its members' content loses a lot of value[...]"
i think PRS feels its getting the short end of the stick and i bet if they could sue youtube for black mail (or what ever else) that's what we would be reading about on TechDirt today./div>
(untitled comment)
and that is why he settled and issued a public apology/div>
Re: Re: Amazon is at fault on fronts
Re: Is it really Amazon?
of course they will, if they want to keep there customers they should protect them. If you have books but no customers your not going far, but if you have customers then publishers will have no choice but to deal with you, I am sure you are familiar with the saying "if you build it they will come"/div>
(untitled comment)
have you ever been to TPB? they use to have a section where they posted letter they received by companies asking them to remove that is copyrighted or threatening them to sue with the responses they sent. TBP staff always made fun of them in there replies./div>
Re:
if protecting them from harm is really the issue then the children should be informed about said harmful issues./div>
(untitled comment)
Not that I am agreeing with the Judge but he has a point in what he said, it should certainly not be dismissed so fast./div>
i totally agree with the verdict.
you send your car to the shop or a car wash, while working on your car they find a human finger. Aren't they required by law to report it?
how is that any different./div>
AG in the paper business
doesnt work like that
lawsuit will go nowere Savvis never said data is secure it only said:
the company "had implemented sufficient security solutions and operated in a manner consistent with industry best practices.
which has nothing to do with Data breach:
-Everyone (or at least most ppl) know that its impossible to have a 100% secure system.
-Savvis never rated security of system, it simply said system is with in the norm.
so unless that system was below standard (and some1 can prove that) Savvis has no liability what so ever./div>
Re: Re: being optimistic are we?
I just think that they're not happy about this and decided to go along cause there was no other alternative./div>
being optimistic are we?
i think PRS feels its getting the short end of the stick and i bet if they could sue youtube for black mail (or what ever else) that's what we would be reading about on TechDirt today./div>
that judge is an idiot
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by braindead.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt