"That’s different from the right to be heard or to say it on a privately-owned platform".
Privately owned, but exempt from libel law with its 230. Once you start censoring posts and deciding what content is or is not newsworthy or valid, you cease being an open platform and then become a publisher. That is the debate. Spamming and flaming are generally expected to get you banned anywhere, as well as death threats, but not allowing someone to share a New York Post article because it involves Hunter Biden is content censorship, and conspicuously right before the election. And, it turns out the New York Post was right. Speculating on Uncle Joe's involvement based on a valid media story is also banned. Welcome to Pravda.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by cport0519.
Re: Re: "Conservatives" apparently banned too
"That’s different from the right to be heard or to say it on a privately-owned platform".
Privately owned, but exempt from libel law with its 230. Once you start censoring posts and deciding what content is or is not newsworthy or valid, you cease being an open platform and then become a publisher. That is the debate. Spamming and flaming are generally expected to get you banned anywhere, as well as death threats, but not allowing someone to share a New York Post article because it involves Hunter Biden is content censorship, and conspicuously right before the election. And, it turns out the New York Post was right. Speculating on Uncle Joe's involvement based on a valid media story is also banned. Welcome to Pravda.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by cport0519.
Submit a story now.