Thanks Mike for delving into the details of how their algorithms work. Anecdotally, I did note a preponderance of "extreme" articles in my feed that has since toned down a bit.
Naive me thought it was my reactive comments that caused it...now I know better.
They may ostensibly be collecting the information to avoid self-harm, but the real question is how wide that information will spread beyond the Chinese walls of the organization. I, for one, wouldn't trust Facebook to not capitalize on such information. Such is the nature of corporate America./div>
If the Article 29 Working Party doesn't reject this out of hand, I expect this will lead to:
- another court challenge from Max Schrems
- Data Protection Authorities will do their job and start taking unilateral action
- the legal departments of some American companies will start a flurry of click-through privacy policy rewriting, since most of them have been couched in terms of we'll do whatever we consider reasonable with your data in order to not be actionable, and now these will be subject to obligations and rights guarantees that are actionable under the Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism
- the "annual joint review" kangaroo court, since it has no authority or enforcement provisions, being dropped entirely because nobody will want to take on the Sisyphean task of being the NSA police without a big gun/div>
Surely the court transcript is a matter of public record.
Perhaps one of the over 150,000 lawyers in the UK with access to the Newcastle crown court transcripts for June 25, 2012 could simply look it up and confirm or deny some of the points in the anonymous blog post that has since been taken down.
Otherwise, I would consider this input as highly suspect./div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Rick O'Shea.
this explains a lot
Thanks Mike for delving into the details of how their algorithms work. Anecdotally, I did note a preponderance of "extreme" articles in my feed that has since toned down a bit.
/div>Naive me thought it was my reactive comments that caused it...now I know better.
unintended consequences is right...
Select individuals with:
☐ suicidal tendencies
☐ low self esteem
☐ actualization anxiety
They may ostensibly be collecting the information to avoid self-harm, but the real question is how wide that information will spread beyond the Chinese walls of the organization. I, for one, wouldn't trust Facebook to not capitalize on such information. Such is the nature of corporate America./div>
next steps
- another court challenge from Max Schrems
- Data Protection Authorities will do their job and start taking unilateral action
- the legal departments of some American companies will start a flurry of click-through privacy policy rewriting, since most of them have been couched in terms of we'll do whatever we consider reasonable with your data in order to not be actionable, and now these will be subject to obligations and rights guarantees that are actionable under the Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism
- the "annual joint review" kangaroo court, since it has no authority or enforcement provisions, being dropped entirely because nobody will want to take on the Sisyphean task of being the NSA police without a big gun/div>
only one qualifying comment
Lost my interest as soon as I saw that./div>
validity check
Perhaps one of the over 150,000 lawyers in the UK with access to the Newcastle crown court transcripts for June 25, 2012 could simply look it up and confirm or deny some of the points in the anonymous blog post that has since been taken down.
Otherwise, I would consider this input as highly suspect./div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Rick O'Shea.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt