Most people who are going to read the articles and ask, "Who's chip does this use?" And pretty much everyone will say, "Oh these are FTDIs!" whether or not it's true.
So won't the result have people shying away from any of their chips in the future?
Seems like another reason why killing the devices is a bad move./div>
Think about it. When someone who doesn't know anything about Jeffery Baldwin sees the statue, what do you think they'll see? What do you think they'll always call it?
"That's the Jeffery Baldwin memorial", says nobody ever.
Most people are going to say, "That's the Superboy statue."
That's the confusion it'll cause. It will no long be a memorial to the tragically short life of a little boy. It's going to forever be remembered as a Superboy statue by everyone who'll forget about the details of his life and death in the future.
I've had this debate with newspapermen before. Newspapers have 2 customers: Readers and Advertisers.
The reader side of the revenue stream is pretty well covered, but people often neglect the negative impact that paywalls have on advertisers.
Advertisers pay for eyeballs. Paywalls reduce the eyeballs on ads, making adspace on their sites less valuable. Either advertisers won't want to pay existing rates for the now-less-valuable opportunity, or they'll just go straight to Google Adwords and host their own business site that's under their own control.
Paywalls are just a faster death to the paper, making the news site less relavent both in terms of a source of news, and as a marketplace for advertising./div>
Another issue may be that EA is publicly traded. It isn't just their management that needs to be convinced that DRM is bad, but their shareholders need to be educated too./div>
Won't this drive business away from FTDI?
So won't the result have people shying away from any of their chips in the future?
Seems like another reason why killing the devices is a bad move./div>
Re: Re: DC isn't wrong in this case.
DC isn't wrong in this case.
"That's the Jeffery Baldwin memorial", says nobody ever.
Most people are going to say, "That's the Superboy statue."
That's the confusion it'll cause. It will no long be a memorial to the tragically short life of a little boy. It's going to forever be remembered as a Superboy statue by everyone who'll forget about the details of his life and death in the future.
The Gutters had a great commentary about this. http://www.the-gutters.com/the-truth-amongst-the-outrage//div>
Re: Re:
(untitled comment)
Newspapers have 2 customers
The reader side of the revenue stream is pretty well covered, but people often neglect the negative impact that paywalls have on advertisers.
Advertisers pay for eyeballs. Paywalls reduce the eyeballs on ads, making adspace on their sites less valuable. Either advertisers won't want to pay existing rates for the now-less-valuable opportunity, or they'll just go straight to Google Adwords and host their own business site that's under their own control.
Paywalls are just a faster death to the paper, making the news site less relavent both in terms of a source of news, and as a marketplace for advertising./div>
(untitled comment)
Parallels the tech industry
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Stephen.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt