"Of course, you also have to assume that this original deal was not one-sided."
You should not assume any such thing. The UK has a history of rolling over and letting the Septics have whatever they want with nothing asked in return.
"It was built in a bottom up manner, mainly by engineers, not bureaucrats"
This is the view trotted out by all Americans who want the US to retain control of the internet.
I don't support the ITU's attempt to gain more control, but please don't portray the internet as an engineer-led project.
The US Dept of Commerce, DARPA, ICANN and other bureaucracies have consistently thwarted engineers' vision of what the internet could be since it was invented.
Just because the ITU is bad doesn't mean the status quo is good.
"Letters, telephone calls, email and the Web -- this is a level of total surveillance that countries like China, North Korea or Iran can only dream of."
This is misleading. The countries you mention regularly inspect the content of communications.
The UK is asking for sweeping powers to inspect the envelope of communications - who you communicate with and when.
It will still require court intervention to carry out wiretapping.
People prepared to jump through the hoops you describe are not the target. They already know how to evade surveillance.
This bill is bringing the internet and postal service into line with what the security services can already do with your phone line.
Your local council, for instance, can already ask the police to request your telephone records (who you called, when and for how long). Now they will be able to ask who sent you mail or email and which websites you visited.
None of this enables people to inspect your mail, or email, or your transactions with websites any more than they can eavesdrop on your phone calls.
They will still need a court order to do that.
I don't agree with this bill but we should fight it with facts, not FUD.
Charles Farr's remark probably means they have penetrated (or come to an arrangement with) the Certificate Authorities.
In other words, the secure channel you think you've established with a web site is in fact a channel to the black box, which records the content and passes on the requests and responses from a central point.
(I am not a security analyst, but I think major corporates already do this when you're inside their firewall)
For US users, Flickr has always restored the picture as it was.
This crazy policy has only affected non-US users. It was first raised 3 years ago, but Flickr refused to change their policy until a well-known journalist and a celeb got involved and started creating bad publicity for them.
Do not assume anything of the sort
You should not assume any such thing. The UK has a history of rolling over and letting the Septics have whatever they want with nothing asked in return.
Check the 2003 Extradition Treaty for example. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK%E2%80%93US_extradition_treaty_of_2003
Better the devil you know
This is the view trotted out by all Americans who want the US to retain control of the internet.
I don't support the ITU's attempt to gain more control, but please don't portray the internet as an engineer-led project.
The US Dept of Commerce, DARPA, ICANN and other bureaucracies have consistently thwarted engineers' vision of what the internet could be since it was invented.
Just because the ITU is bad doesn't mean the status quo is good.
DNS blocking
Packet inspection? No, just envelope inspection
This is misleading. The countries you mention regularly inspect the content of communications.
The UK is asking for sweeping powers to inspect the envelope of communications - who you communicate with and when.
It will still require court intervention to carry out wiretapping.
Re: Payment
Beware of thinking BitCoin is anonymous. It isn't unless you take appropriate steps.
Re:
Re: Private communication
This bill is bringing the internet and postal service into line with what the security services can already do with your phone line.
Your local council, for instance, can already ask the police to request your telephone records (who you called, when and for how long). Now they will be able to ask who sent you mail or email and which websites you visited.
None of this enables people to inspect your mail, or email, or your transactions with websites any more than they can eavesdrop on your phone calls.
They will still need a court order to do that.
I don't agree with this bill but we should fight it with facts, not FUD.
HTTPS decryption
In other words, the secure channel you think you've established with a web site is in fact a channel to the black box, which records the content and passes on the requests and responses from a central point.
(I am not a security analyst, but I think major corporates already do this when you're inside their firewall)
This just affects non-US users of Flickr
This crazy policy has only affected non-US users. It was first raised 3 years ago, but Flickr refused to change their policy until a well-known journalist and a celeb got involved and started creating bad publicity for them.
Copyright killing innovation
The effect may be indirect but the root cause is clear.
Replacement for Jon Postel
In a sane world, IANA would be run by the Internet Society from tomorrow.
http://www.internetsociety.org/
Of course we don't live in a sane world, but one dominated by macho politics. IANA will remain with ICANN.
Re: Re: Collateral damage
By all means abandon it and use another site, but leave the existing content where it is.
hypothes.is
You may be interested in hypothes.is which aims to provide open, web-based peer review for pretty much anything.
Felix Salmon is a yank?
Fourth Amendment to what?
Perhaps some of your readers might have appreciated this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Dominic Sayers.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt