Gabriel Tane's Favorites Of The Week: Censorship At Home And Abroad
from the favorites-of-the-week dept
This week's list of "favorite" posts of the week is handed off to Gabriel Tane
Friends! Countrymen! Techdirt-ians! Lend me your... eyes! It's my turn to stroke my ego and pretend
that anyone cares to hear what I have to say about issues. But, if you're still reading (and keep on
reading), then I'll assume you're at least interested. So, read on and thanks for your attention.
First up, we'll start with a whole slew of related articles that
show how the DHS/ICE domain seizures have some serious questions that need some
answers. This week, we've seen stories
that discuss what
does the situation mean to
our international relations. The question of jurisdiction has been batted
around in the comments as a matter of technicality, but not a lot was said
about how far-reaching of an effect this may have if other countries decide
they don't like how we seem to be rather bully-ish about how our laws are more
important than others'. I don't know the
answer to that question, but since our actions so far have been to pull our
plug out and thumb our noses, I don't think I want to know the effect.
Further, we've seen where the technical
understanding and legality
have been called into question by more than just
bloggers and interested lawyers. Now, have the questions
been raised in such a way that will force the hand of DHS/ICE? Probably not; but the fact that so many
people are raising their eyebrows about it means there is something going on that needs to be looked at. And it will, sooner than later I hope.
Second, I also got quite interested in the patent-vs-innovation
article that was posted. It seems that
the status-quo is being questioned even by those "inside" the system. In a very broad way, I wonder how long until
actual common sense is going to win over the juggernaut of established bureaucracy. Hmm...
Third, I was very interested to hear about the situation in Egypt. Actually, I heard about it here first. I didn't follow it completely and thoroughly, but I did have a face-palm moment at this
story about the timing of American legislation that people said included an "internet kill switch." I was worried about someone
posting comments from a tin-foil fort about how Egypt was some kind of warning
about what would happen if the US increased its censorship... and here comes the
government showing how such a claim wouldn't be too far of a stretch. sigh. At least China
was worried about the implications.
Further on the face-palm front... I was glad to see the TSA
getting a clue with new scanners that don't show you naked, and realizing the people who write the paychecks are not
happy with their actions -- and not surprised to see them completely ignore the
need for effective screening that
actually does something other than
justify a paycheck.
Fourth and finally, ain't technology
grand!? Seeing Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric discover the internet was fun. Now, much like the rest of
you, I found this to be an amusing view on how technology has grown and how
silly we see ourselves then, 20+
years later. I was, again like most of
you, sadly not surprised when a major news corp followed this up by completely overreacting
to the situation, firing the person responsible and, thus, creating the much-loved Streisand-effect. I wonder how long it's going to take before
the reality of the internet's openness and, well, immortality sinks in to the
people who think they can just wish information away.
There were so many fun stories this week, I know I didn't get them all covered. I think I covered the ones that echo
strongest with me: the fact that our government seems to want to censor what's
on the internet (arguably, at the beck and call of the entertainment industry)
while another country (our ally?) faces some very serious consequences for that very action.
I think we've seen the start of a trend towards people
wanting real answers to what's going on. I know that as I read the comments from both
sides (at least, those on either side
that choose to provide data), I learn more and more about how these things do
and should work. For that, I would like
to take a purely-selfish moment and thank all the commenters -- regulars, ACs, insiders and outsiders -- for helping me broaden my knowledge about the world
around me.
And, of course, I do so love to see how far technology has
come in the last few years... and if anyone wants some authentic
AOL coasters, let me know ;).
Re: Re: Re: Word play
Anyone else notice that the 'other option' of the current administration seems to be a constant train-wreck of a contest to see who can be bat-shit crazier, thereby getting more people to vote Obama back in again? Almost like someone out there wants to keep the status-quo as long as possible?
"hey everyone... look how craaaazy your other options are! A bunch of nutty bible-beating scary's! Those would be much worse than a Kenyan Socialist Commie!"
Now go cast that vote which has never mattered because your election isn't based on the general popular majority and is instead based on the Electoral College and this whole Primary Party Vote and one candidate-per-party thing is not listed anywhere in the constitution. But never mind that! vote vote vote!!! You're an American hating TERRORIST who not only doesn't support our troops, but actively causes them to DIE if you don't vote. And you hate puppies.
Crap. Dropped my tinfoil hat./div>
INB4
Sorry... feeling plucky today. I like the fact that there's yet another example (because, you know, it won't work for everyone) of how you can turn piracy into a boon. And make a great success at it as well.
My example: Shared my copy w/ my two girls... Cost Rovio what? $20? $30? Now they both snatch up Angry Birds Merch wherever they can. Already paid Rovio over $100 last year alone.
Win!/div>
Re: Re: Re:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It struck me the other day...
I think they're both crap... each for different but equally vapid reasons./div>
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You: "Hollywood is innovative"
Me: "No they're not... show this innovation"
You: "Well, neither was Silicon Valley!"
Do I need to point out the argument fail there?/div>
Re:
Re: Re: The List
Re: Re:
So, where are these new stories?
As Katt Williams says: "Don't worry... I'll wait"/div>
Re: and all the princess movies:
Re: Hit it on the head, possibly not like they thought
I don't think TPB meant that they were making the movies.
But if you continue their line of reasoning, what they're wanting to do is turn the whole world into Hollywood... where anyone can not only make a movie, but get it distributed without being mired down under the legal muscle of a vastly over-inflated beast./div>
Re: Re: Re: It struck me the other day...
Sounds to me like they know a winning thing when they see it.
Me? I haven't been to the theater in a while. Haven't bought a DVD in a while either. I do, however, love my "goofy movies from the 80's" list and the like on NetFlix./div>
Re: Re:
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Anal-iaze.
Thanks for catching that ;)/div>
Re: A matter of priorities
who's fault?
Is this just another example of shifting the blame and shirking responsibility?/div>
Re: Re: Yay for word of the day.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110925/22403016086/did-few-million-virtual-monkeys-ran domly-recreate-shakespeare-not-really.shtml#c1107/div>
Idea vs Expression
Re:
For example: I work for a major insurance company who was, and still is, a major player in the Agent business model. When the Great Big Interweb came along and our competitors started trying to say "see, you can buy it here, no need for agents!", we shifted what our agents do. Now, they enable the purchase of insurance by providing additional value to the purchase. By answering questions and offering guidance on what and how much to purchase, these enablers are able to make the purchase a better experience for the customer.
In this sense, 'enabler' isn't necessarily the dry, dictionary definition, but the 'marketing power word' that means "the people who assist in getting prospects to become customers by giving value to the experience"... which is exactly what the article is talking about./div>
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Feb: "Broadbrush" month
Mar: "Kool-Aid" month
Apr: "Sycophant" month
May: "jackwagon" month
June - Dec: ???/div>
Re: Re: Re: Re: "Pirate Mike"
From what I'm reading, the judge is arguing the same thing as Mike... that the original purpose of copyright was to promote progress. The judge doesn't say anything about whether this is still applicable./div>
More comments from Gabriel Tane >>
Gabriel Tane’s Submitted Stories.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt