@17 carriers shouldn't be allowed to block any port they want? They own all those ports so....
@18 Skype is free to NOT sign a deal with a carrier that requires an exclusive; what you are describing is actually "competitive"
@19 Two companies deciding to raise prices is not "anti-competitive," it's "competitive." "Anti-competition" requires government intervention into free markets, and I see none of that here. Skype and Verizon are in business to make money; If you feel screwed by their plans, then start your own carrier./div>
I do not think that word means what you think it means
@18 Skype is free to NOT sign a deal with a carrier that requires an exclusive; what you are describing is actually "competitive"
@19 Two companies deciding to raise prices is not "anti-competitive," it's "competitive." "Anti-competition" requires government intervention into free markets, and I see none of that here. Skype and Verizon are in business to make money; If you feel screwed by their plans, then start your own carrier./div>
Anti-competitive?
Verizon owns its network, and should be allowed to dictate who can use it, and for what purpose. Skype can choose to market any product it wishes.
You think differently?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Ian.
Submit a story now.