sean’s Comments

• Aug 16th, 2018 @ 2:32pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Checks and Balances

  on 'Oversight' Hearing Fails Utterly To Hold FCC Accountable For Lying To Congress About Fake DDOS Attack
  We're talking past each other as you're reading into my comments something I am not intending. I am suggesting that people desiring checks and balances need to vote in a way that works in the electoral college instead of hanging our hats on winning a majority that does not ensure victory.
• Aug 16th, 2018 @ 1:59pm

  Re: Re: Checks and Balances

  on 'Oversight' Hearing Fails Utterly To Hold FCC Accountable For Lying To Congress About Fake DDOS Attack
  I don't disagree; unfortunately, the electoral college does not need a majority as we've learned a few times in the past 5 presidential elections. Our process is broken if we want to have the will of the people heard.
• Jan 5th, 2018 @ 9:30am

  Re: I foresee the Facebook problem. (as Sean)

  on China Plans To Turn Country's Most Popular App, WeChat, Into An Official ID System
  I use WeChat often. Perhaps a person gets banned from the components of WeChat where violations of terms occurred, but that person is not banned from the ID portion of WeChat. That could be easy to implement.
• Sep 8th, 2016 @ 9:45am

  (untitled comment) (as Sean)

  on Vox: If The Clinton Email Scandal Has Taught Us Nothing Else, It's That Email Should Be Exempt From FOIA Requests
  The problem with Steve Reilly's argument is that the feds getting records of a phone call require a wire tap. The feds should get the same wire tap (so to speak) to copy a person's emails. If they then make a federal record of having acquired those emails, then perhaps those emails should be subject to the FOIA requests, but not all emails.