I think the 2nd poster had it right. The disruption clearly came from the person that distributed the pictures at school. It's not any different than if they took a 'Playboy' to school and showed it around. The only difference is that the people in the pictures go to the school, so the principal had an easy target. And the whole appology to the coaches thing is clearly a power play on the school's part. Why humilate the girls more? I'm pretty sure if I gave a crap about political correctness that I would call that harassment of a minor. It's a clear example of a person in a position of authority abusing that power to manipulate a person with no power. Welcome to high school girls!/div>
Bri said: "So at this point, why in the hell isn't the judge holding them in contempt of court??? That better be the next step, along with jail time for anyone involved in not relinquishing the information."
That's what I was thinking. Starting putting people in jail for contept and you'll start getting the documents you asked for./div>
Maybe someone should start a 'fan' site for the disgruntled fans to post their own pictures. Of course they couldn't use the Redskins name, because someone might confuse it for an official Redskins site, since it seems likely that the Redskins would post a bunch of picture of people that are pissed at the team onwer! If I gave a cr@p about the 'Skins I'd start the site myself, but I'm sure SOMEBODY in the DC area knows how to sign up for a blogger account.
BTW, wasn't it a Redskins' TE that posted a picture of the playbook he was studying on his personal blog last year. A picture taken of the book in his lap -- where he wasn't wearing any pants . . . and posted it just before going to the game. The post was up for the entire game. He claimed he didn't realize his privates were in the picture.
Seems like the 'Skins could use a lesson in tech-savvy./div>
I use my winMo phone with g-mail and google-contacts. Instant update and back up with over-the-air automatic sync. Doesn't seem to be a problem. Cheez-it.
And while AT&T tries to tell me what apps I can run on my phone (no worries, it's unlocked now ;) ), Microsoft can't kill anything - unlike the iPhone./div>
So if the radio stations have to pay higher royalty rates, does that mean the record companies have to pay more payola to the stations so their artists get more air play? Cheez-it (that's how it's done).
That is how it works isn't it?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by j. wyatt.
Who caused the disruption?
Re: Hmmm
That's what I was thinking. Starting putting people in jail for contept and you'll start getting the documents you asked for./div>
blog the pictures
BTW, wasn't it a Redskins' TE that posted a picture of the playbook he was studying on his personal blog last year. A picture taken of the book in his lap -- where he wasn't wearing any pants . . . and posted it just before going to the game. The post was up for the entire game. He claimed he didn't realize his privates were in the picture.
Seems like the 'Skins could use a lesson in tech-savvy./div>
back this up on your iPhone
And while AT&T tries to tell me what apps I can run on my phone (no worries, it's unlocked now ;) ), Microsoft can't kill anything - unlike the iPhone./div>
payola
That is how it works isn't it?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by j. wyatt.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt