kh’s Comments

• Apr 19th, 2013 @ 5:17pm

  Re: Texas Plant Explosion

  on Former DHS Official Says Boston Bombing Proves ACLU & EFF Are Wrong About Surveillance And CISPA
  You might consider the Texas explosion was caused by lack of surveillance. They were last inspected for safety in 1985 and fined $10,000. The various governments apparently inspect companies like this in Texas once in every 126 years.
• Sep 6th, 2012 @ 4:25pm

  Re: Re: Re:

  on $exytime: Thanks To An Easily Exploitable System, Three Lawyers Have 'Patented Sex'*
  England calling. We want our language back. From here on you have to pay us to use English. Go invent your own language.
• Sep 4th, 2012 @ 4:41pm

  As opposed to the rest of the company

  on Forget The Death-Star Anti-Mosquito Lasers, Here's How Nathan Myhrvold Can Help Tackle Malaria -- And Improve His Image
  VP of Global Good vs. rest of company!!! Not good. Seems right.
• Sep 4th, 2012 @ 4:39pm

  Re:

  on FBI Denies That Hacked Apple Info Came From FBI
  And a very fast broadband connection and the owner didn't notice a 3TB upload and no-one else noticed?
• Sep 4th, 2012 @ 3:31pm

  Re:

  on Why Does Copyright Last 70 Years After Death... But Licenses Expire At Death?

  For the same reason that money only goes up.

  
  And doesn't trickle down...
• Oct 14th, 2011 @ 6:48pm

  creepy

  on Take Picture Of Your 4-Year-Old Daughter Eating Ice Cream... Get Investigated Under Terrorism Act [Updated]

  A member of staff at the centre's ice cream stall is said to have told officers that Mr White took photographs of her with his trouser zip open.
  

  
  Making him look as creepy as possible?
  
  

  He added: “It is because Mr White chose to seek publicity for his account of events and because of the planned demonstration that we feel compelled to take the unusual step of making our findings public.
  
  “In reaching our conclusions, officers took statements from a number of independent witnesses and viewed the substantial amount of CCTV that was available in the centre.
  
  “On reviewing all of this objective evidence, I have to tell you that we can find no basis to support the complaint which Mr White has elected to make.

  
  So they reviewed their CCTV footage, which apparently was OK for them to take under their "no photographs" rule, and they somehow found that no-one mentioned terrorism? Did they have microphones as well?