Wahhhh’s Comments

• Jun 2nd, 2016 @ 10:26am

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  Wrong and wrong.
• Jun 2nd, 2016 @ 10:25am

  Re: Re: Re: Re:

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  What? DMCA has nothing to do with harassment. Complainant incorrectly used DMCA takedown. That is all.
• May 31st, 2016 @ 9:39am

  Re: Re:

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  Yes, I agree that filing a false DMCA takedown request is going out of ones way to intimidate another into silence.
• May 31st, 2016 @ 7:09am

  Re:

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  Awe, ya got me. Good one.
• May 31st, 2016 @ 7:08am

  (untitled comment)

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  How have you made determination this is "abuse of women"? It's abuse of DMCA because complainant can dish it out, but wants to silence any backlash. Period.
• May 30th, 2016 @ 11:05am

  Re: Re: Re:

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  Doesn't appear from story that the pic in question was a portrait or selfie. Abuse of DMCA.
• May 30th, 2016 @ 9:52am

  Re:

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  "Tip: In general, the photographer and NOT the subject of a photograph is the actual rights holder of the resulting photograph." one of many reasons why this was not a valid DMCA takedown request.
• May 30th, 2016 @ 8:39am

  Re: Re: Re: Re: The DMCA filing was not valid.

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  What's all this bitterness got to do with abuse of DMCA? Nothing.
• May 30th, 2016 @ 6:54am

  Re: Re: The DMCA filing was not valid. (as LondonJ)

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  Don't put pics on public sites if you don't want them seen. The point is, this was abuse of DMCA. The complainant should be sanctioned for filing a false DMCA complaint & blaming Twitter for her inability to read what she was signing/research DMCA procedures. She just wasted everyone's time.
  If ya can't take the heat, don't get involved in trying to remove other peoples freedoms. Or don't cry victim when there's backlash.
• May 27th, 2016 @ 5:43pm

  The DMCA filing was not valid. (as LondonJ)

  on The DMCA Should Not Be An All Purpose Tool For Taking Down Content; And It's Espeically Bad For Harassment
  I've read the story, and there is also quite a backstory.
  This was an invalid DMCA filing, period. It appears the complainant simply did not like the tweets being sent about her. Sometimes that's just called Twitter-not harassment. The pic complained about appears to have come from a FB account, so not stolen. And the use appears to have been covered by fair use. That's all.
  In any event, Twitter clearly advises DMCA filer that personal info may be sent to party accused of infringement. Complainant should have been aware of what she was signings when she filed complaint.
  On the other hand, I wonder where complainant got the screenshot of the messages she alleges were sent between the infringers? Very suspicious. IMO.