ObserverInPA’s Comments

• Oct 28th, 2021 @ 9:17pm

  LOLOL

  on Why Falsely Claiming It's Illegal To Shout Fire In A Crowded Theater Distorts Any Conversation About Online Speech

  This poster does not know the law AT ALL. Please do not hire her if she pretends to be a lawyer. This is the MOST ridiculous post on TD in a long history of pseuso-legal posts in many years.

• Dec 22nd, 2020 @ 10:31pm

  Apologist?

  on Czech Search Engine Seznam Joins In the 'Let's Sue Google' Fun, Seeks $417 Million in Damages

  The entire tone of this post suggests the OP thinks it is preposterous that the most Evil corporation in the universe could actually be guilty. Dependent on SEO income, much? Garbage Post - and that is being generous.

• Apr 13th, 2018 @ 11:16am

  'incredibly silly"

  on Ted Cruz Demands A Return Of The Fairness Doctrine, Which He Has Mocked In The Past, Due To Misunderstanding CDA 230
  Incredibly silly? What a COMPLETELY ignorant thing to say. If you had been around, you would have KNOWN how effective it was. There would BE no Fox News propaganda if it were still here. This site is about to go off my RSS feed page, now that I know what a simpleton is in charge.
• Feb 16th, 2018 @ 9:53am

  Judge (can't see the) Forrest

  on Terrible Copyright Ruling Over An Embedded Tweet Undermines Key Concept Of How The Internet Works
  Judge Forrest is a well-known corporate advocate. If there exists any basis for finding in favor of a large corporation, she will find it. If none exists, she will invent it - she's creative that way. Here, while the plaintiff is an individual, the real purpose of the ruling is to create causes of action for the large corporate IP owners - the only ones with the deep pockets to use this right of action in a widespread basis.