|
About Gene Cavanaugh
Juris Doctor and registered patent attorney, specializing in small entity patenting (mostly Jepson patenting) and small entity trademarks. Skilled in large entity patenting, but avoid such work. Former executive in several companies, with high marks for executive ability (but "too idealistic"). Semiconductor process and design expert. My undergraduate degrees are in Math and EE (BS). Also reasonably skilled in aerospace matters, but a long time ago.
|
Google Nest
How can anyone argue the microphone was "secret" when Google announced a new use for it? Isn't that an obvious oversight? If it were an intentional act, why would they then tell us it is there?
I think some people need to put their brains in gear before they engage their mouths.
/div>Stupid Patent of the Month
But the outrage is misdirected. These people are the salt of the earth, but REQUIRED BY LAW to follow certain procedures, and the procedures are made by people who haven't a clue, but love the feeling of power it gives them!
You want common sense? TELL LEGISLATORS to allow people who KNOW what they are doing to make the rules!/div>
Recount
be irrelevant?
Maybe T-rump won, but two million and growing definitely justifies a recount!/div>
Copyright Register?
Copyright Register?
A little sanity is required here
Clinton knows some people who may be lying or mistaken, and some of them work for her (not OWNED by her, work for her, like Pence saying things that T-rump doesn't like).
But everything they say is "Clinton"? Don't think so./div>
I am deeply disappointed in TechDirt
Adding anonymous sources making up numbers (Tea Party numbers?) for the "confidential email" fantasy is VERY disappointing!
Comey, in a meeting with a Congressional Committee said there were THREE emails with a (C) marking in the body - a mark that Comey incorrectly interpreted as "confidential" (it means "copyright", in case anyone is wondering), and added that there was no "there, there" for a prosecution (and Comey is a long-time dedicated Republican!).
Building bullshit on top of bullshit is causing a lot of people to switch to Hillary, but for TechDirt to add to the pile is REALLY depressing!/div>
Clinton's email server
1. Clinton was really smart to use her own servers, since otherwise she would have been hamstrung by unending and expensive (to the taxpayers) "investigations" by Congress.
2. All the classified documents found were STATE DEPT. classified, which she controlled, so no crime. If there had been even one SECURITY document in the pile, Comey would be required to (and eager to) prosecute.
3. Clinton evidently handled her emails professionally, no evidence of GOP hackers getting in to steal stuff.
Wow! I am going to vote for her!!!!/div>
Clinton's email server
As an attorney: stop the nonsense! There was no crime involved, and she was following long established procedure, which with the 25 years of badgering, sounds pretty smart./div>
Australian Patent Law
We still have to wait for further clarification, but the odds are that is what will be finally decided./div>
(untitled comment)
Otherwise for security matters. So, Classification means whatever we intend it to mean.
VERY logical to me.
If you are saying this shows the evil of "W" and Cheney, there you get my complete agreement. Those people ignored what classification meant, and messed with documents that had nothing to do with the State, and involved our safety!/div>
Drunk RNC Convention
(untitled comment)
Clinton's emails"
Being a lawyer, and a lover of our Constitution, we have only to look at the ex post facto provisions of that Constitution to see that sending and receiving AFTER classified emails is NOT a criminal matter!
I agree about whistleblowers, who are wrongfully pursued by the "wannabe" dictators in the Obama administration, but please - stop quoting Rupert Murdoch in his "hate Hillary" campaign - if Hillary can be shown to have sent/received classified documents AFTER they were classified, we have a whole new discussion (which doesn't exist at this time)./div>
Exercising
Walking slowly, exercising with very light weights - I don't really see much benefit. Walking faster (like, trying to keep up with my oldest daughter), working out with weights that challenge me a bit, big benefit.
I can almost make a chart of length of time versus quality of exercise for maximum benefit (at least, for me) and less time but more challenge (to a point) versus a long time but less challenge - same benefit.
Be interested in seeing a controlled study about that./div>
T-Mobile
is looking better, for all its faults./div>
Experian breach
agency back door? That seems likely to me./div>
Clinton emails
Bush/Cheney regularly sent emails they KNEW were classified in private emails. Clinton sent unclassified (though I hear four were LATER classified - to embarrass her? Don't know) emails. No evidence yet she meant harm, or thought she was doing anything wrong - otherwise for Bush/Cheney. So she MAY be "unreliable" - THEY ARE!
So, why is the "liberal" (aka Murdoch) press interested only in Clinton? Shouldn't we be outraged at Bush/Cheney? Also, they didn't tell anyone - it came out later; just as she didn't tell anyone - came out later; but they KNEW they were sending classified material - not yet determined for her.
Is this what you call "fair and balanced?"./div>
Autonomous vehicles
I don't think the manufacturer could decide how to program for that. In the absence of legislation, we would need a switch that let the passenger decide which thing to do.
That would absolve the manufacturer, but then ....
Wow!/div>
On peer review
More comments from Gene Cavanaugh >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Gene Cavanaugh.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt