Prosecution: The stop was pre-textual
Court: Not a problem
P: It was extended to allow a canine search
C: What you gonna do?
P: The officer shot and tased my client repeatedly
C: No case on point for this - QI
P: They scuffed the tires
C: WHAT!? This is outrageous. Evidence suppressed.
Interestingly for companies who claim that more accurate broadband maps are overly onerous, this implies that these companies actually have a much finer grained view than is made available to regulators or consumers.
From some conversations I've had in recent days with non-technical people there is an intuitive understanding that the decline of traditional news is existential and they're pretty sure it's the fault of companies like G/FB.
What they struggle to articulate is where that nexus is.
People literally don't know how G/FB make money.
From that point of view a law that purports to transfer wealth from winners (G/FB) to losers (trad media) sounds just like a tax - something that gets extra support owing to G/FBs practice of shifting profits offshore.
While I agree with you that now everyone will come knocking at Google's door cap-in-hand I don't agree that this will be bad for Google.
Reportedly the agreement signs up the news orgs into Google's Showcase product at which point Google becomes the single largest source of income for all of these organisations.
It will likely cost google a bunch of money in the short term but it potentially short-circuits the legislation and over time Google can apply the Youtube treatment to it's 'partners'. That is, screw them down, mess with their traffic and jump through new and arbitrary hoops.
All the while, google starts to become the 'Where' of news.
Tech people on here who have worked with large orgs and government should really understand how 'new and emerging requirements' get handled in these situations.
Firstly, almost no development will be getting done in-house. Your new reporting solution will need to go to an external party who is just dying to milk time and money from your government department.
People are here talking about databases which might be part of the solution but then how are you extracting data and where's it going to? I mean, do people really think the contact tracers have SQL access/skills?
No, contact tracers are a hastily assembled call-centre group with no CRM system who probably work by having a team-leader assigning cases out of a spreadsheet (yes, a spreadsheet).
The real story here is how, in the era of ubiquitous IT, it is still almost impossibly hard for technology solutions to respond quickly to changing circumstances in a way which is reasonable for front-line workers, manages data security, is flexible and is accurate. And that's not even considering cost.
I'm not suggesting Excel is the 'right way' but there are very good reasons it gets used.
As a footnote, I notice with interest mention of the XLS 'format'. I'd be interested to know more about that, it's a common data-analyst trick to add an XLS extension to a tab-delimited text file. File associations will cause this to open in a recipients Excel with a warning about file format. In this scenario you are not limited in the number of rows but I wonder what happens if someone tries to save said file. I imagine it will apply the 'correct' XLS format and truncate the file.
Having done similar things in sensitive settings you can also use neutral 3rd parties to combine/match data and execute on sending letters etc.
Also, you don't actually need personal information - you only care about the vehicle so a "Dear Owner" letter to a street address minimizes exposed data while still achieving the desired outcome.
Big numbers are hard to process so for context that amount of money would have funded a €20,000 grant EVERY SINGLE DAY for 10 years with enough left over to fund administration of the scheme.
Fifth generation wireless (5G) is not magic. It's not witchcraft.
I think for a big chunk of people modern technology is equivalent to magic. I also think that the overhype contributes here because people see something they don't understand being heavily promoted but which doesn't have any apparent effect.
This is no doubt unpersuasive to the 'Pirates=Bad' crew but as demonstrated here it can be the gateway drug.
As a kid I spent any money I could get on games but pirated far more than I bought - pre-internet so all via (often multiple) disks.
Illegal? Yes. Lost sales? Zero.
Fast forward to now and I've bought almost every game I ever pirated - many multiple times. I'm also a games junky spending far more on games than any sane adult should and with my biggest problem now being my enormous and growing backlog of 'Bought but not Played' games.
LinkedIn completely checks out: Leads all digital transformation programs and supports the Mayor's ongoing efforts to modernize the City of Baltimore's IT capabilities, which also include scaling the local IT ecosystem to drive awareness & tech investment in Baltimore City.
Now the city has to modernise and invest. Job done.
This is always such a terrible argument. That a juror would have such an infantile intellect that, upon hearing of a prior conviction, they couldn't possibly entertain the notion that the accused might be innocent.
You've seen the exact opposite play out in the last few days with two(!) former Prime Ministers basically arguing that the jury was wrong.
Reasonable people can make reasonable decisions even knowing about a prior conviction and bigots will be bigots regardless of what they know.
This is exactly how it will play - cop needs to arrest someone so he calls up his off-duty buddy, tries to effect an arrest but (sad tale) suspect resists arrest. Voila - off-duty cop $500 richer.
Is this just survivor bias in action? The winning party and their voters have little interest in reforming the system. As far as they're concerned the outcome was 100% accurate. For the losers? Rigged election? Well, they would say that wouldn't they?
Priorities
Prosecution: The stop was pre-textual
Court: Not a problem
P: It was extended to allow a canine search
C: What you gonna do?
P: The officer shot and tased my client repeatedly
C: No case on point for this - QI
P: They scuffed the tires
C: WHAT!? This is outrageous. Evidence suppressed.
You'll be proved wrong...
Naysayers said the same about Brockway, Ogdenville, and North Haverbrook but monorail put them on the map.
Implied knowledge
Interestingly for companies who claim that more accurate broadband maps are overly onerous, this implies that these companies actually have a much finer grained view than is made available to regulators or consumers.
Some observations from an Australian
From some conversations I've had in recent days with non-technical people there is an intuitive understanding that the decline of traditional news is existential and they're pretty sure it's the fault of companies like G/FB.
What they struggle to articulate is where that nexus is.
People literally don't know how G/FB make money.
From that point of view a law that purports to transfer wealth from winners (G/FB) to losers (trad media) sounds just like a tax - something that gets extra support owing to G/FBs practice of shifting profits offshore.
Re: Oh you stupid, stupid fools...
While I agree with you that now everyone will come knocking at Google's door cap-in-hand I don't agree that this will be bad for Google.
Reportedly the agreement signs up the news orgs into Google's Showcase product at which point Google becomes the single largest source of income for all of these organisations.
It will likely cost google a bunch of money in the short term but it potentially short-circuits the legislation and over time Google can apply the Youtube treatment to it's 'partners'. That is, screw them down, mess with their traffic and jump through new and arbitrary hoops.
All the while, google starts to become the 'Where' of news.
Re: Re: Re:
It does.
It pops a big box that says 'Significant loss of functionality' and then a decent blurb explaining exactly what's about to happen.
I suspect the issue is probably that someone wrote a VBA macro that may not have the same safeguards.
Not too much self reflection here
Tech people on here who have worked with large orgs and government should really understand how 'new and emerging requirements' get handled in these situations.
Firstly, almost no development will be getting done in-house. Your new reporting solution will need to go to an external party who is just dying to milk time and money from your government department.
People are here talking about databases which might be part of the solution but then how are you extracting data and where's it going to? I mean, do people really think the contact tracers have SQL access/skills?
No, contact tracers are a hastily assembled call-centre group with no CRM system who probably work by having a team-leader assigning cases out of a spreadsheet (yes, a spreadsheet).
The real story here is how, in the era of ubiquitous IT, it is still almost impossibly hard for technology solutions to respond quickly to changing circumstances in a way which is reasonable for front-line workers, manages data security, is flexible and is accurate. And that's not even considering cost.
I'm not suggesting Excel is the 'right way' but there are very good reasons it gets used.
As a footnote, I notice with interest mention of the XLS 'format'. I'd be interested to know more about that, it's a common data-analyst trick to add an XLS extension to a tab-delimited text file. File associations will cause this to open in a recipients Excel with a warning about file format. In this scenario you are not limited in the number of rows but I wonder what happens if someone tries to save said file. I imagine it will apply the 'correct' XLS format and truncate the file.
Re:
Yeah, I noticed this too. I think it makes it funnier because they are more literally 'copying' the Brewdog beer.
Re: Re:
Just anonymise the data before you release it. Everyone knows you can't deanonymise data.
Re:
Agreed.
Having done similar things in sensitive settings you can also use neutral 3rd parties to combine/match data and execute on sending letters etc.
Also, you don't actually need personal information - you only care about the vehicle so a "Dear Owner" letter to a street address minimizes exposed data while still achieving the desired outcome.
Context
Big numbers are hard to process so for context that amount of money would have funded a €20,000 grant EVERY SINGLE DAY for 10 years with enough left over to fund administration of the scheme.
Starved (of funds) artists indeed.
My new t-shirt
"I bought into the 5G hype and all I got was this lousy coronavirus"
For some people...
I think for a big chunk of people modern technology is equivalent to magic. I also think that the overhype contributes here because people see something they don't understand being heavily promoted but which doesn't have any apparent effect.
Old man shouts into void
This is no doubt unpersuasive to the 'Pirates=Bad' crew but as demonstrated here it can be the gateway drug.
As a kid I spent any money I could get on games but pirated far more than I bought - pre-internet so all via (often multiple) disks.
Illegal? Yes. Lost sales? Zero.
Fast forward to now and I've bought almost every game I ever pirated - many multiple times. I'm also a games junky spending far more on games than any sane adult should and with my biggest problem now being my enormous and growing backlog of 'Bought but not Played' games.
I don't pirate now because I don't need to.
Fair Use Yoga
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Re: Re: Re:
LinkedIn completely checks out:
Leads all digital transformation programs and supports the Mayor's ongoing efforts to modernize the City of Baltimore's IT capabilities, which also include scaling the local IT ecosystem to drive awareness & tech investment in Baltimore City.
Now the city has to modernise and invest. Job done.
New advertising slogan...
Asset Forfeiture - Bitcoin doesn't seem like a bad idea any more
Re:
This is always such a terrible argument. That a juror would have such an infantile intellect that, upon hearing of a prior conviction, they couldn't possibly entertain the notion that the accused might be innocent.
You've seen the exact opposite play out in the last few days with two(!) former Prime Ministers basically arguing that the jury was wrong.
Reasonable people can make reasonable decisions even knowing about a prior conviction and bigots will be bigots regardless of what they know.
Re:
Survivor bias?
For the losers? Rigged election? Well, they would say that wouldn't they?
More comments from R2_v2.0 >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by R2_v2.0.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt