|
About M. Alan Thomas IIMy addiction started when I began reading copyright law for fun in college, and it's all been downhill from there: library school, a "Guild of Radical Militant Librarians" t-shirt, an information policy Tumblr, and now Techdirt. |
(untitled comment)
For example, they improve with the quality of the information available, so false advertising is banned. They fail when monopoly power is used to shut out smaller competitors, so monopolies are heavily scrutinized and regulated. It's only the most ideologically rabid of free-marketers who think that they want a completely laissez-faire market system, because that inevitably leads to a conversion of the free market to a monopoly market. We can see how these concepts translate into the marketplace of ideas without simply discarding the concept.
Second, when evaluating certain user behaviors, I do think that it's useful to momentarily set aside the xkcd strip and ask, "Would I be okay with this if the government did it?"
For example, is the government engaging in a vigorous debate about the virtues of its policies? That's great! Is it flooding the debate space with propaganda bots? That's . . . not so great. Did a government spokesperson interpret the facts in a way that I disagree with? That happens in a society of diverse thought. Is a government spokesperson flat-out lying about the facts? That's a problem. Again, we can see how these concepts translate into instinctively grasping which behaviors by client-side actors we disagree with.
Third and finally, let's not forget that the First Amendment is not absolute. Strict scrutiny is a hard but not impossible bar, particularly when the goal is to ensure that all voices are heard rather than to silence one of them./div>
Re:
(untitled comment)
Disclosure of even metadata about my communications may cause jeopardy to important privacy interests because, much like a jigsaw puzzle, each detail may aid the government in piecing together information about the content and circumstances of my communications and would allow law enforcement, or national security agencies, to accumulate information and draw conclusions about my life in order to violate my privacy./div>
(untitled comment)
Re: Re: Re:
I would also accept "principality." :P/div>
Re:
That said, it's legally a country./div>
(untitled comment)
Re: Re: Re: Procedural Question
This is actually a vehicle for one of the primary attacks on the situation: Pointing out how unfair it is that some citizens of the UK are gagged while others are not. Or, as some of the newspapers have pointed out, that their Scottish edition can run the story but their England edition can't even say which story it is that they can't run./div>
Re: Motion to Dismiss
Re:
(untitled comment)
It's a lot more obviously a "procedure, process, system, [or] method of operation" that way, too.
But, as I said, this is where even a well-educated layperson in a related field can get confused./div>
(untitled comment)
(1) It's not an exemption for "work products"; it's an exemption for Congress. Congress did not make itself subject to FOIA. Nothing needed transforming into a "work product"; the only question was who had control of it.
(2) "Work product" does not mean "unfinished" or "deliberative" (which does not mean "unfinished" either); those are different things, each of which might or might not be true of the same document. The phrase "work product" is only used because it's shorter than "that thing that they made."/div>
(untitled comment)
That doesn't mean that we haven't limited copyright such that it might not apply here, and that certainly doesn't mean that copyright's purpose is being served here, but a monopoly being used to do a monopoly's work is a monopoly and should be called out as such.
"Copyright is monopoly, and produces all the effects which the general voice of mankind attributes to monopoly. [...] I believe, Sir, that I may safely take it for granted that the effect of monopoly generally is to make articles scarce, to make them dear, and to make them bad." —Lord Macaulay, then in the House of Commons/div>
(untitled comment)
(untitled comment)
Re: Re: Re: Can't imagine where the confusion comes from.
(untitled comment)
Re: Re:
Re:
(untitled comment)
More comments from M. Alan Thomas II >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by M. Alan Thomas II.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt